Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

🌍🌐🌎Windsor brokers 🌍🌐🌍ویندزور بروکر🏅🏅🏅♦️♦️♦️

@sedaghat_2018

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

217subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164129216
TypeChannel
Username@sedaghat_2018
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sedaghat_2018

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@mpa1392dainond/831913 Dec 2024, 18:18 UTC@sedaghat_2018/4988 · this entry13 Dec 2024, 18:28 UTC1.0010 minutes
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mpa1392dainond10 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 minutes@mpa1392dainond (91)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 3 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 16 comparable posts for this entry, running 13 December 2024 to 11 December 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @mpa1392dainond. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_copy, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

2177 Aug 2026, 04:27 — 217 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:32 — 217 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 04:277 Aug 2026, 04:32
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 216–218 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 04:32217no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:27217first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 13 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,710
Videos
37
Links
243

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 13 December 2024 to 11 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Dec 2025, 08:35 UTC183 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainond

دوستان برای بررسی و روند بازار از سال ۱۳۹۴ کہ زمان تاسیس کانال بعد از گروہ بودہ دلار در بالا پستی کہ ریپلای کردم ۳۶۰۰ بودہ ھمچنین سکہ و انس طلا بد نیست با وقت گذاشتن و مرور گذشتہ کہ ھر لحظہ اش تجربہ ای بودہ نگاھی کنید تجربہ ھایی کہ از کف بازار بودہ و با کسب علم ھمگام شدہ و در ھیچ کتاب یا دورہ اموزشی دیدہ نخواھد شد با ارزوی ایندہ ای نہ از جنس این ۱۰ سال گذشتہ یک فاکتور سکہ طلا ۱۲۰ برابر ھم بیشتر شدہ میانگین سالی ۱۰ ب

11 Dec 2025, 08:11 UTCviews —

🌍🌐🌎Windsor brokers 🌍🌐🌍ویندزور بروکر🏅🏅🏅♦️♦️♦️ pinned «⚡️مهارت‌های معاملاتی خود را با دوره‌های فارسی ویدیویی رایگان دبلیو ام مارکتز ارتقا دهید! فرقی ندارد که تازه شروع کرده‌اید یا در بازار تجربه دارید؛ ویدئوی های فارسی ما طراحی شده‌اند تا شما را به سطح بعدی برسانند. با بیش از 70 ویدئو، موضوعاتی را پیدا خواهید…»

11 Dec 2025, 08:11 UTC181 viewsread 7 August 2026

⚡️مهارت‌های معاملاتی خود را با دوره‌های فارسی ویدیویی رایگان دبلیو ام مارکتز ارتقا دهید! فرقی ندارد که تازه شروع کرده‌اید یا در بازار تجربه دارید؛ ویدئوی های فارسی ما طراحی شده‌اند تا شما را به سطح بعدی برسانند. با بیش از 70 ویدئو، موضوعاتی را پیدا خواهید کرد که به بهبود عملکردتان کمک می‌کنند. اما این همه ماجرا نیست! همچنین به صورت نامحدود به موارد زیر دسترسی دارید: 📚کتاب‌های الکترونیکی – دانش عمیق معامله را باز کن

11 Dec 2025, 04:41 UTC143 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

✅ نحوه افتتاح حساب در بروکر ویندزور ابتدا VPN خود را روشن کنید، لینک زیر را کلیک کنید و sign up کنید: https://km.mywmportal.com/?pt=2124 دقت کنید رمز انتخابی حداقل 8 کاراکتر شامل عدد و حروف و یک حرف کوچک و یک حرف بزرگ باشد حرف بزرگ اول باشد. مانند 5698Mh569 پس از تکمیل فرم sign up را کلیک کنید سپس ایمیل خود را چک کنید و لینک فعالسازی را کلیک کنید. با ایمیل و رمزی که انتخاب کرده اید وارد پرتال شوید و برای آپلود

1

9 Jun 2025, 04:09 UTC295 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainond

✅با سلام خدمت همراهان گرامی 💥💥💥 💎کانال تحلیل تخصصی بازار به زودی فعالیت مجدد رو در همین کانال عمومی با کیفیت بیشتر شروع میکند💥 آرزوی سلامتی و موفقیت❤

9 Apr 2025, 07:24 UTCviews —

🌍🌐🌎Windsor brokers 🌍🌐🌍ویندزور بروکر🏅🏅🏅♦️♦️♦️ pinned «@windsorbroker_support1آیدی ادمین کانال جهت پیوستن به کانال سیگنالدهی رایگان 👆👆👆»

6 Apr 2025, 11:58 UTC346 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainond

@windsorbroker_support1آیدی ادمین کانال جهت پیوستن به کانال سیگنالدهی رایگان 👆👆👆

16 Jan 2025, 14:05 UTC435 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainondPhoto

این هم هدف ۲۷۱۷ که هم روی چارت و توضیحات و هم در اسکرین شات متاتریدر هدف ۲۷۱۶ تعیین شده در پست قبلی توی همین کانال هم طی دو ساعت پیش حداقل ۲۰ دلار نوسان رو میتونستید بگیرید ⭐️⭐️⭐️توجه کنید دوستان حسابی که من‌باهاش ترید میکنم یک حساب‌ ۳۰ دلاری ریل بوده که تا این لحظه در سه ترید اسکلپ از اصل سرمایه هم بیشتر سود گرفته شده برای دیدن استیمنت این حساب میتونید به ادمین کانال که در پست های قبلی میباشد پیام بدید و به کانال سی

1

16 Jan 2025, 13:41 UTC351 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainondPhoto

این هم نتیجه تحلیل و سیگنال یک ساعته میش دقیق تا عدد ۲۶۹۹ اطلاح انجام شد و فعلا ۲۷۱۱ را شکسته در صورت تثبیت بالای لایه مقاومتی که مقاومت ۲۷۲۷ میباشد ادامه افزایش را تا سقف قبلی فعلا خواهیم داشت ⭐️⭐️⭐️توجه کنید وارد تایم آمریکا شدیم احتمال نوسان شارپی جهت استاپ زنی بالاست الان حجم رو رعایت کنید اکر دوستان در همیت کانال عمومی طبق فروش اسکالپ که دیدید تا ۲۷۰۱ نزدیک ۷ دلار نوسان فروش و از اون حمایت ۲۷۰۱ به هدف ۲۷۱۱ ابتد

16 Jan 2025, 12:23 UTC257 viewsread 7 August 2026
Photo

نتیجه دو سیگنال اسکلپ امروز که دوستان در خواسته بودن در دو تایم پنج دقیقه با حجم سه صدم ۷ دلار رفت و ۷ دلار برگشت گرفته شد نوش جان برکت 🙏👍

16 Jan 2025, 12:23 UTC252 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainond

نمونه سیگنال اسکالپ در کانال سیگنالدهی خدمت شما عزیزان 👆👆👍

16 Jan 2025, 12:23 UTC234 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mpa1392dainondPhoto

با سلام انس طلا طبق تحلیل‌های قبلی مجدد به لایه مقاومتی کع بین ۲۷۰۷ تا ۲۷۱۷ میباشد رسید فعلا در تایم یک ساعته با کندل چکشی همر ریزشی نتونست مقاومت ۲۷۱۱ را رد کند و تا زمانیکه ۲۷۱۱ شکسته نشود احتمال اصلاح فعلا تا ۲۶۹۹ و ۲۶۸۶ میباشد ولی توجه کنند دوستان خط روند اصلی کاهشی شکسته شده و تا زمانیکه انس بالای این خط روند میباشد همچنان ریزش ها اصلا در روند افزایشی اصلی میباشد قابل توجه آن دسته از تحلیلگران که در محدوده ۲۶۱۱

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sedaghat_2018. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 97,458 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“🌍🌐🌎Windsor brokers 🌍🌐🌍ویندزور بروکر🏅🏅🏅♦️♦️♦️” (@sedaghat_2018), 217 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sedaghat_2018.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.