Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

owner of socks#УкрТґ🌚

@secrfack

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

252subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001761770816
TypeChannel
Username@secrfack
DescriptionВ¡таю! постараюсь бути смішним. Другий канал --> @theryler Прислати контент та написати адмінам --> @Socksguard_bot.
Created3 May 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/secrfack

Growth

2526 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 252 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 02:17 — 252 subscribers6 Aug 2026, 10:017 Aug 2026, 02:17
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 251–253 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Aug 2026, 02:17252no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:01252first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 13 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 26 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4,480
Videos
3,470
Links
598

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

80 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🥰3037.5%
2126.3%
🔥56.25%
💘45.00%
😁45.00%
🤝45.00%
🤣45.00%
🤯45.00%
🍓22.50%
😢11.25%
🫡11.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 13 February 2025 to 26 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Mar 2025, 12:09 UTC≈1,350 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

🔥5🤯2

21 Mar 2025, 16:38 UTC833 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @lgshkvshtPhoto

Вас тепер 2000 на каналі! І тому у мене для вас розіграш!!! Новісінький, ще в плівочці набір INFERNUS MARINES +PAINTS! Як виграти? Все просто! Ставте + в коментарі. Нічого не треба донатити, з вас лише підписка і плюс в коментарі! Результати будуть 23 березня, в неділю о 21:00. Дякую всім за підтримку!

🤝4

19 Mar 2025, 19:41 UTC530 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @taksyst_plachePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰81

19 Mar 2025, 13:31 UTC436 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @gifis_anPhoto

УВАГА Маленький манул Дякую за увагу

🥰8

15 Mar 2025, 13:45 UTC336 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soleca_princoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

😁2🫡1

4 Mar 2025, 07:13 UTC398 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @paskudnescabinetPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

7

26 Feb 2025, 07:02 UTC371 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SlonceMemesPhoto

Доброго ранку :р

3🥰3

25 Feb 2025, 21:03 UTC300 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @soleca_princoPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰4

23 Feb 2025, 19:29 UTC287 views4 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @cs2yachmonianewsPhoto

Гравець випадково запустив CS2 на холодильнику і виграв турнір. Невідомий кіберспортсмен запустив Counter-Strike 2 на "розумному" холодильнику та, несподівано для всіх, виграв онлайн-турнір. Він пояснив, що випадково встановив гру, намагаючись знайти рецепт борщу. Організатори турніру були шоковані, але після перевірки з’ясували, що гравець не використовував чітів – просто клавіатуру та мишу, підключені до холодильн

🤣4

23 Feb 2025, 17:14 UTC244 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @WitchChortophaikaPhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @secrfack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,080,417 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“owner of socks#УкрТґ🌚” (@secrfack), 252 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secrfack.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.