Channel
@secrets_chamber
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
26subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001642260053 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @secrets_chamber |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 23 April 2022 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/secrets_chamber |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 1 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 78% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Sept 2026, 00:02 | 26 | -1 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 27 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 27 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 23 April 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 October 2022. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
39 reactions across 16 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 46.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 18 | 46.2% | |
| ❤ | 9 | 23.1% | |
| 👎 | 5 | 12.8% | |
| 👏 | 4 | 10.3% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 5.13% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 2.56% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 39 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 April 2022 to 1 October 2022, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
💥در فصل ۱۱ کتاب: اخلاق شناسایی درستی از نادرستی، نوشته پرفسور لوییس پویمن و جیمز فیشر، تاکید شده حجاب فقط یک اتیکت اجتماعی یا عادت فرهنگی است و ارتباطی با اخلاق ندارد. @philosophy123456
👍1👎1
پرفسور لویی پویمان، دارای دکترای فلسفه اخلاق از دانشگاه آکسفورد: پوشاندن یا نپوشاندن سر و صورت یک اتیکت اجتماعی یا یک عادت فرهنگی است و ربطی به اخلاقیات ندارد. اخلاقیات یعنی صداقت، راستگویی و نیکی.
👍3👎1
〰مجموعه فلسفه و زندگی〰 #اخلاق #فلسفه_اخلاق
👍1
🎧 آهنگیفای: جستجوی موزیک
👍1
شاید یکی از وجوه سختی و دشواری زندگی آدمی انتخاب بین چندراهی های پیش رویش باشد . شاید سخت تر از اون انتخاب بین یک دوراهی ممکن باشه . اما قطعا هولناک تر همه، دوراهی که میدانی هر دو راه تو را زمین گیر و به پرتگاه #سقوط می کشاند وتنها زمانش است که تفاوت دارد. باید اعتراف کنم من سقوط کردم سقوطی جنون آمیز سقوطی افسرده سقوطی ناگهانی سقوطی در عمق تنهایی سقوطی در سکوتی پرهیاهو سقوطی در لابه لای قفسه های کتابخانه سقوطی از…
❤2👍1
#راغب #سقوط نیچه : زندگی بدون موسیقی اشتباهی بزرگ است
👎1
هر کدام‌‌مان داستانی هستیم، در انتظار خواننده‌ای وفادار، تا ما را از روی قفسه‌ای بردارد و تمامی پیچش‌های داستان‌مان را با آغوش باز پذیرا باشد. جان مارک گرین #داریوش #سقوط
👍3👎1
🖊هنوزم به نگات همون حسی رو دارم که داشتم ...
👎1
پرواز را به خاطر سپار پرنده مردنی است
👍3❤1
کتاب #فلسفه_در_چهل_ایده #فیلوسوفیا بخش اول
👏1
کتاب #فلسفه_در_چهل_ایده #خودشناسی #بخش_سوم
👏1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3🤩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @secrets_chamber. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تالار اسرار 𖢥” (@secrets_chamber), 26 subscribers as measured 7 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secrets_chamber.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.