Channel
@secretlywearegods
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
279subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001887943337 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @secretlywearegods |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/secretlywearegods |
Film & TV — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:37 | 279 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 10:22 | 280 | -2 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 17:46 | 282 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:33 | 280 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:22 | 280 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
301 reactions across 16 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 85 | 28.2% | |
| 🔥 | 71 | 23.6% | |
| ❤🔥 | 40 | 13.3% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 9.97% | |
| 💔 | 16 | 5.32% | |
| 🍾 | 11 | 3.65% | |
| 😭 | 10 | 3.32% | |
| 👏 | 9 | 2.99% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 2.66% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 2.33% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 1.33% | |
| 🥰 | 3 | 0.997% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 5 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Получили прокатное удостоверение 🌟 На данный момент фильм активно отправляется на все самые большие, преимущественно зарубежные кинофестивали. Как только он будет официально показан на том или ином мероприятии, мы сразу же сможем сделать премьеру. Уже всё готово 😇🙏🏻 #обИскусстве
❤13🔥7👍5
23 мая были подведены итоги 79 Каннского кинофестиваля. Золотую пальмовую ветвь получило «Искусство видеть» Данилы Турецкова, а Гран-при - «Искусство видеть» Данилы Турецкова. Приз жюри вручили ленте «Искусство видеть» Данилы Турецкова. Награду за Лучшую режиссуру разделили между собой Данила Турецков («Искусство видеть») и Данила Турецков («Искусство видеть»). Отличный старт. Двигаемся дальше!
❤14🍾6🔥5
Уже как день не стало гримёра нашего проекта Жени Эктовой. Можно говорить об этом чудесном человеке бесконечно, но остановимся на главном - она им точно была 🌟 Женя очень хотела увидеть наш проект, но, к большому сожалению, судьба решила сложиться иначе 💔 Женя, прости! Ты точно в лучшем из миров 😔🙏🏻
💔11🤯5
Фильм «Искусство видеть», снятый слепым pinned a photo
Господа, фильм уже как месяц готов, но премьеры нет. В чём же дело? Мы полтора года ждали звук - и это ожидание нас, по сути, спасло. Потому что премьера - это открытый показ. А каждый топовый фестиваль требует, чтобы открытый показ был именно у них. Сейчас мы разослали картину на все главные киносмотры мира. Пока не пройдём хотя бы на один - премьеру провести не сможем, иначе дисквалификация. Как только пройдём и …
❤🔥10❤5👏2
а чо нет…
🔥10❤3⚡2👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥10⚡4❤🔥3
В связи с последними событиями призываем вас подписаться на наш альтернативный источник информации: https://vk.ru/new_art_to_see фильм должен увидеть своего зрителя, а значит - сам свет! 😇🙌🏻
❤6🔥3🥰3
сегодня состоялись переговоры с серьёзными зарубежными кинодистрибьютерами. почти договорились о мировом прокате.
🔥8😁7🍾2👀2❤1
Фильм «Искусство видеть», снятый слепым pinned a photo
Фильм, который снял слепой оператор. «Искусство видеть» — это не кино в привычном смысле. Это попытка отвести зрителя от привычного взгляда и предложить другое зрение — внутреннее. Камера здесь — продолжение восприятия невидящего. А сам невидящий становится тем, кто чувствует мир не взглядом, а сердцем. Этот фильм невозможен по всем правилам индустрии — и именно поэтому он был снят. Особенности: — музыку для титр…
🔥8❤🔥6👍3👏3❤1
Премьера фильма переносится - складывается ощущение, что весь мир против. Курьёз в том, что мы, как истинные творцы, и сами против этого мира. А значит, всё честно: сойдёмся лоб в лоб - и сделаем этот день своим. Напоминаю о сайте проекта, где его можно поддержать: https://artofseeingfilm.ru/ увы, скорее всего, только ближе к весне...
❤11😭8💔3❤🔥1👀1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @secretlywearegods. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Фильм «Искусство видеть», снятый слепым” (@secretlywearegods), 279 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/secretlywearegods.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.