Channel
@sechenov4s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
328subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002318054437 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sechenov4s |
| Description | Sechenov Student’s Surgical Society - 4S Contact: @Niloufarrzy |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sechenov4s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 328 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 328 | first reading |
9 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
69 reactions across 9 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 30 | 43.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 16 | 23.2% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 11.6% | |
| 🎉 | 7 | 10.1% | |
| 🤝 | 4 | 5.80% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 2.90% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.45% | |
| 😭 | 1 | 1.45% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 69reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
We are delighted to share our latest publication in Colorectal Disease, a leading Q1 journal in surgery.🎉🥳 This article is particularly important because it demonstrates NOSES VIIIb right hemicolectomy with transrectal specimen extraction in a young woman. Unlike the commonly used transvaginal route, the transrectal approach provides an alternative natural-orifice extraction strategy that may better address fertilit…
🎉5❤2❤🔥2🤯1
We are pleased to inform you that for Medical Spring 2026, we submitted four abstracts, and all of them have been accepted for publication. Following this achievement, 11 of our members received official certificates in recognition of their contribution to these scientific works. The members are: 1.Niloofar Rouzy 2.Faizal Mohammed Farid 3.Mahdi Mohamed Fadl Mohamed 4.Rana Darausheh 5.Zahra Arein 6.Yuvraj Singh 7.N…
❤🔥7❤2🎉2🤯1
On the 26th, we had an engaging session discussing bowel anastomosis techniques and the surgical management of anastomotic leakage, a major and challenging complication after gastrointestinal surgery. With this meeting, we conclude our sessions for the current semester. The schedule for the upcoming semester will be announced. 🤝 Thank you for being with us, and we look forward to seeing you again next semester!
❤7❤🔥2🤝1
📢 Dear Students , We are pleased to invite you to a theoretical session on bowel anastomosis techniques and the surgical management of anastomotic leakage, one of the most serious complications following gastrointestinal surgery. 📝 During this session, I will also collect the names of students interested in giving presentations next semester. This will be our final meeting of the semester, so don’t miss this oppor…
❤🔥2❤1🔥1😢1
On 12 May, we held a meeting on one of the core aspects of oncologic colorectal surgery: lymph node dissection. The session covered key principles, important anatomical landmarks, and modern techniques for safe and effective lymphadenectomy. Operative video demonstrations were also included to provide a practical, step-by-step view of real surgical approaches. The session was presented by Niloofar Rouzy and Mohamme…
❤8❤🔥1
If anyone is interested in presenting at our upcoming meetings, please send me a message. This option is open to everyone @Niloufarrzy And if you’ve already messaged me before, please message me again.
❤2❤🔥1
We are pleased to invite you to the upcoming 4S Scientific Club meeting dedicated to one of the key pillars of oncologic colorectal surgery : lymph node dissection. This session will go beyond theory, focusing on the core principles, anatomical landmarks, and modern surgical techniques that define safe and effective lymphadenectomy in colorectal procedures. To make the discussion more practical and clinically relev…
❤6🤝3❤🔥1
Hello everyone, and a warm welcome to all our new members! 🎉✨ This video captures the amazing moments of the 4S team at the MedSpring Festival 2026. We had so much fun, and it truly meant a lot to have you all there. Thanks to all our members for participating, and thank you for coming!🙌 We’ll be continuing our meetings soon and will share our next topic in the coming days and will also choose our presenters. 📢 l…
🔥7❤1😭1
🙂Второй день «Медицинской весны» в объективе Молодежной редакции Не можем остановиться знакомиться и общаться с молодыми учеными и врачами, знакомиться и примерять их профессию на практике. Вот чем участники Фестиваля студенческих научных кружков могли заняться на стендах СНК: 🟦На стенде СНК хирургии 4s попробуйте нанести хирургические швы и узнайте больше о торакальной хирургии. 🟦Вместе с резидентами СНК «Адаптив…
❤1
Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @sechenov4s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,267,525 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sechenov 4S” (@sechenov4s), 328 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sechenov4s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.