💜💜 Представляем вам долгожданную аудиозапись "Крысиного таро" с таймингами! 💜💜 Еще раз огромное спасибо всем ребятам, кто пришли в гости, и тем, кто просто были с нами на этом стриме! 💜 00:12:10 💜 mafiosnik; Renaissance 💜💜 💜 00:32:30 💜 dinozavr; eloquent 💜💜 💜 00:50:00 💜 mosamakt; Winx 💜💜 💜 01:08:22 💜 Meow; VOLTA 💜💜 💜 01:34:29 💜 jbq; Acceptance 💜💜 💜 02:02:25 💜 Gast; Mirrow 💜💜 💜 02:28:52 💜 Lisa; Improve 💜💜 💜 03:01:24…

Channel
SEX-RATS ROOM
@sec_rats
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
82subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1003214856518 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sec_rats |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 3 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sec_rats |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:54 | 82 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 82 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 3 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 12s
- Average length
- 12s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
91 reactions across 14 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 24 | 26.4% | |
| ❤ | 15 | 16.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 15 | 16.5% | |
| 💯 | 13 | 14.3% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 9.89% | |
| 💅 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 😱 | 5 | 5.49% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 November 2025 to 5 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
💜💜 Хотели ли вы когда-нибудь узнать свою судьбу? 💜💜 SEX-RATS представляют Вам новую рубрику, созданную специально для грядущего Elysium PW - "Крысиное таро!" Уже 3 мая в 19:00 мы сделаем шуточные (а может быть и серьезные) расклады на такие темы, как: 💜 Как пройдет грядущий старт Elysium у разных гильдий; 💜Узнаем о том, какие трудности могут ждать их в процессе развития; 💜А так же - просто весело проведем время, п…
🔥5❤4😁2
Мы готовим кое-что интересное👸 А пока... 🎀 bupsi 🎀 🎀 Ferrari 🎀
❤🔥5💅5💯5
Пока все отдыхают в ожидании сервера, секси-крысы делают свою работу 🤩 😐 bupsi: Я неоднократно говорила, что все эти тик-ток хаусы/сквады/детдома для беженцев с других проектов - полная хуйня и скам. И, прикиньте, так и оказалось! 👠🎀 Я один раз получила "приглашение" в эту штуку, на что сразу отказала, ведь это пиздец)) Неоднократно говорила Бусе о том, что надо ливать с этой херни, а в конце туда еще притянули одн…
❤5💯3🔥2🍌1
🫦 Навели шуму за последний месяц и сделаем сервер еще громче вместе 🌺 наши соцсети 🌺 🔥bupsi 🔥Буся aka Ferrari 🌸 За анимацию спасибо Александру
❤🔥4🔥4💯3
🎉 Результаты розыгрыша: 🏆 Победители: 1. Eidzoku (@Suicidn1k) 2. Светлана 3. Павел Тинькоф (@GreinHamus) 4. Pin9 (@pin9tv) 5. Alexsoliya (@alexsoliya) ✔️Проверить результаты
🤩 В общем и целом... Секси-крысы несли посыл вам, что не стоит верить всему в интернетах и принимать чью-то сторону без каких либо доказательств. 🤩 Всегда проверяйте факты, смотрите со стороны, а не вставайте на сторону человека исходя из "нейма" или чего-то подобного. 🤩 Смотрите со стороны, следите за тем, что мы делаем и вот вам моменты со стрима (bupsi), и стрима (буся) 🤩 А также розыгрыш 500 голды для 5 челов…
Что мы говорим клану Winx? Мы будем драться! Уже сегодня, 9 февраля сразу после АТН, в 21:20 нас ждет интервью с мастером клана Mirrow - Secret. 😈 Как появился клан Mirrow? 😈 Откуда взялся ник "Царь-Батюшка" и "Secret?" 😈 Какие дальнейшие планы у ребят на дальнейшую стратегию? 😈Что насчет противостояния в тир 1? Разберем все, что касается клана Mirrow, пообщаемся с его мастером, и, возможно, одним из маршалов 😊 🤩…
❤1
У него много имен... Однако, какое из них настоящее? Хdenshot, АТАКУЮЩИЙ, и причём тут Кирилл Дерябин 🐰 Совсем скоро мы познакомимся с мастером гильдии STFU, которая сейчас активно развивается на сервере Rampage PW! 🤗 😊 Как прошли последние GvG? 😊Зависимость от Масады? 😊Клан как прибыльная возможность переехать в Турцию? 😊 Как появилась гильдия STFU? 😊 Почему именно деншот, а не камшот? Заходите на стрим 2 февра…
❤2🔥2😱2😁1
Долгожданная аудиозапись интервью с ребятами из Winx! ❤️ Слушаем, комментируем ❤️ Всегда рады вашим отзывам и предложениям!
❤🔥4💋1💯1
Дамы и господа, интервью с Lem aka Aestic состоится 26 января в 18:00 по мск. Ждем каждого из вас ❤️ P.S. В процессе стрима вас ждут приятные сюрпризы в виде розыгрыша золота от ведущих! 💅Twitch буси 💅 🫦 Twitch bupsi 🫦
Произошли небольшие технические проблемы, поэтому клипчики и моменты можно под этот пост 🎀😍
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sec_rats. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 979,074 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@sec_rats named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SEX-RATS ROOM” (@sec_rats), 82 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sec_rats.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.