Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Алёнушка Рашенматрёшен

Channel

Алёнушка Рашенматрёшен

@sebya_na_rychki

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,777subscribers

-38 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001479188572
TypeChannel
Username@sebya_na_rychki
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live28 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 28 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sebya_na_rychki

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 51% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,7772,8152,7967 August 2026 — 2,815 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,815 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,814 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,813 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,814 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,813 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,812 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,808 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,807 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,803 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,795 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,796 subscribers19 September 2026 — 2,782 subscribers28 September 2026 — 2,777 subscribers7 August 202628 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 52 days, net -38. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,771–2,821 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
28 Sept 2026, 16:382,777-5
19 Sept 2026, 05:182,782-14
15 Sept 2026, 04:582,796+1
11 Sept 2026, 21:592,795-8
7 Sept 2026, 16:582,803-4
2 Sept 2026, 09:532,807-1
30 Aug 2026, 06:452,808-4
27 Aug 2026, 07:582,812-1
23 Aug 2026, 23:552,813-1
20 Aug 2026, 11:122,814+1
14 Aug 2026, 13:462,813-1
10 Aug 2026, 21:232,814-1
7 Aug 2026, 19:032,815no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:502,815first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 21 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

522 reactions across 8 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤31760.7%
🔥7113.6%
❤‍🔥5710.9%
😁315.94%
💯173.26%
🥰173.26%
🤩101.92%
🦄20.383%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 522 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Jul 2026, 09:28 UTC394 views49 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Раз пошёл такой разговор, покажу в чем я сегодня и что занюхиваю до дыр. «Танец стрекоз», nobile 1942. Нежная яблочная шарлотка с щепоткой корицы под шариком ванильного мороженого. Не сильно диффузные, но безумно вкусные - поэтому расточительно струячу как не в себя, как душевой лейкой, как будто выбрала «быть счастливой, папа». Даже если он закончится за это лето, будем считать, что я этого и добивалась. В чем в…

❤49

15 Jul 2026, 08:50 UTC401 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Из подслушанного. Девушке в ЗЯ выбирают духи и покупают, кажется, ее родители: - А вот эти, смотри, будут ко всему, такие универсальные, комплиментарные, окружающим понравится.. Дочь, недолго думая: - Есть «влиться в общество», а есть - «быть счастливой», папа… И, кажется, взяла какие-то особо полюбившиеся 🥰.

❤52🔥6

1 Jul 2026, 19:31 UTC698 views68 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤37🔥17🤩10😁4

1 Jul 2026, 18:44 UTC629 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Учу моего малыша свистеть, будет самый крутой во дворе! (да-да, это никакой не свист, я просто кладу угощение, сейчас внизу будет нормальный пост, вдруг сюда тоже надо)

🔥35❤‍🔥14🥰9

17 Jun 2026, 15:11 UTC850 views79 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

«Лучшая версия себя» - заранее тупиковая идея, требующая остановиться в развитии, потому что предполагает, что есть какой-то определенный идеальный образ себя. До него, мол, и будем «добирать баллы» и допиливать себя лобзиком. В то время как посмотрите свою фотопленку лет пять назад. Повертите в памяти, на что тогда целились. Я посмотрела. Повертела. И что? Конечно, «крем-сода» (с). конечно, часть приоритетов помен…

❤‍🔥43❤23🥰8🔥3🦄2

13 Jun 2026, 17:12 UTC895 views65 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Учусь, ребята. Кутерьма всякая. Дела срочные. ТекстА будут. А пока то, как меня видит ИИ. «Устроим проблемы вашим конкурентам. Дорого. Коты работают за двойную оплату». пс: считаю, сделал так же «филигранно», как поддакивает в диалогах 👌🏻

❤41💯17😁7

22 May 2026, 13:24 UTC≈1,280 views71 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Инициация состоялась! Я купила гладилку. Мою первую! Пока гладила, надумала пост. (хорррошая все-таки оказалась покупка, медитативная, чего ж я раньше то… вы там если еще чего-то знаете с подобным эффектом и не говорите - скажите 🙏🏻)

❤41😁20🔥10

21 May 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,010 views74 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Роскошь - не в сумках (я не придумала интересного сравнения, просто забудем это клишированное начало и читаем дальше), роскошь - хоть иногда, но быть в моменте. Ловить его за хвост и не бежать. Вот это - настоящий люкс, понимаете? Недавно с мужем так «жировали» в парке. Сын нас туда привел, потому что у него должна была состояться сделка - знакомый мальчик очень хорошо делает смартфоны. Собирает сам, без посреднико…

❤74

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @sebya_na_rychki. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

juliaodevaet
@Juliaodevaet · 34,072
Telegram ranks this channel #46 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 1 October 2026
Вротвамсчастья
@Happyvrot · 19,679
Telegram ranks this channel #53 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 30 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алёнушка Рашенматрёшен” (@sebya_na_rychki), 2,777 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sebya_na_rychki.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.