Channel
@sebastianwippel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
669subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001135796962 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sebastianwippel |
| Created | 11 December 2020 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sebastianwippel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 15:37 | 669 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 | 672 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 672 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (24 July 2026 – 5 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,211 |
| Reactions total | 408 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 08:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
408 reactions across 20 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 96.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 393 | 96.3% | |
| 👎 | 15 | 3.68% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 408reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Rund eintausend Juristen (von ca 440.000 in Deutschland) – darunter nach Auswertung der Jungen Freiheit 53 Richter und sieben Staatsanwälte – fordern in einem offenen Brief Bundestag und Bundesregierung auf, ein AfD-Verbotsverfahren einzuleiten. Sie berufen sich auf ein 1.500 Seiten starkes „Gutachten“ der „Gesellschaft für Freiheitsrechte“ mit angeblich über 2.500 Belegen und erklären die Beweislage bereits für „e…
👍25
Kampf gegen Rechts: Sachsen blind für Linksextremismus?
👍22
. ‼️👉 Fraktionen lehnen AfD-Antrag ab: Innenausschuss spricht nicht über Ceuta „Der Innenausschuss des Bundestages kommt am Dienstag zu einer Sondersitzung zusammen. Thema der Videoschalte ist der Anschlag auf den Christopher Street Day. Ein Antrag der AfD, zusätzlich über die Lage in der spanischen Exklave Ceuta und mögliche Folgen für Deutschland zu beraten, wurde von den übrigen Fraktionen abgelehnt. (…) Bauma…
👍18
53.000 US-Dollar Medianvermögen pro Erwachsenem: Das ist die Zahl, die Deutschland laut dem aktuellen UBS Global Wealth Report 2026 auf Platz 30 und damit an das absolute Ende der entwickelten Welt katapultiert – hinter Griechenland, hinter Slowenien, hinter Portugal, hinter Italien, Spanien und Frankreich. Belgien, Luxemburg und Dänemark liegen bei über 200.000. Die Schweiz, Österreich, alle vor uns. Das ehemals s…
👍11
Zu Ministerpräsident Kretschmer: Keine Kooperation von CDU und AfD? Dann eben allein für Deutschland!
👍26
Schon wieder! Am Wochenende wurde in Dresden ein 20-Jähriger schwer verletzt in ein Krankenhaus gebracht. Ein Syrer griff ihn mit einem Messer an. Wir fragen: Wann werden ausländische Messermänner endlich konsequent abgeschoben? Im zweiten Halbjahr 2025 kam es in Sachsen zu 1.277 Messerattacken (Drs. 8/5530). Im ersten Halbjahr 2025 waren es 1.072 (Drs. 8/3476). Im zweiten Halbjahr 2024 lag der Wert bei 968 (Drs. 8…
👍21
Die Bundesnetzagentur bastelt seit Jahren im Stillen an einer „Sicherheitsplattform Strom“. Klingt harmlos? Ist es nicht. Sobald es eng wird mit dem Strom, können die Beamten energieintensive Betriebe zwingen, den Verbrauch runterzufahren; und wenn die nicht spuren, fliegt der Strom einfach ab. Vorlaufzeit: 24 Stunden bis drei Tage. Entschädigungen? Fehlanzeige. Die Firmen bleiben auf dem Schaden sitzen. Das Ganze…
👍22
https://youtu.be/azzA2zPIvHs?is=NXNobOH2KAQ8n23O
👎8
Tausende junge Männer aus Nordafrika stürmen gerade Ceuta und jetzt auch Melilla. Über 60.000 schon! Sie schwimmen mit Reifen rüber, knacken die Zäune, greifen Beamte an und zünden Autos an. Die Grenze ist zusammengebrochen – sagt sogar die spanische Polizei selbst. Geschäfte zu, Leute haben Angst, und etliche Tote. Und was macht Madrid? 60 Soldaten schicken. Lächerlich! Diese Männer wollen nicht in Ceuta bleiben.…
👍30
Sportschützen, Jäger und DU: unter Generalverdacht!
👍18
Millionen für NGOs, statt Gefährder abzuschieben: Schluss damit!
👍23
Bundesnetzagentur plant heimlich Zwangsabschaltung von Industriestrom Eigentlich sollten die Pläne geheim bleiben: Seit Jahren entwickelt die Bundesnetzagentur eine Plattform, mit der sie Unternehmen zur Drosselung zwingen und sogar Abschaltungen anordnen kann, wenn es zu einem Strommangel kommt. Entschädigung wird es in solch einem Fall nicht geben. Artikel lesen Kanal abonnieren
👎7
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sebastianwippel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 279,062 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Sebastian Wippel |
|---|---|
| Description | German politician |
| X / Twitter | @SebastianWippel |
| YouTube | UCjTXWQom4CJuWUN0A9ndbyQ |
| Official site | https://sebastian-wippel.de/ |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sebastian Wippel” (@sebastianwippel), 669 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sebastianwippel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.