Let’s full reaction to this post and as always I’ll provide fundamental analysis⚡️
❤5🔥1

Channel
@seatlyfx
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Cite this entry
329subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002048032442 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seatlyfx |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 28 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 28 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seatlyfx |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 15:58 | 329 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 332 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 14:52 | 332 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 5 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
41 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 36.6% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 24.4% | |
| custom 6032852535889369604 | 9 | 22.0% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 9.76% | |
| custom 5085022089103016925 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| custom 5116380246626534280 | 1 | 2.44% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 2.44% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 41 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 5 June 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @seatlyfx. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 June 2026 to 17 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Let’s full reaction to this post and as always I’ll provide fundamental analysis⚡️
❤5🔥1
Posted without readable text
👍2
🇺🇸News day🇺🇸 🗣17-june (bugun)🔥 ⚠️23:00 Federal Funds Rate ⚠️23:00- FOMC statement 🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️🖱️ ⚠️23:30- FOMC press conference ⏰ Time GMT+5
custom 60328525358893696043custom 50850220891030169251
the best swing trade 🥹 (7400pips)
custom 60328525358893696045🔥2👍1
XAU/USD sell 4125 sl -4132 tp -4088
File, posted without a caption
🔥3
7000 pips (700 punkt) for now
4088 …..
What does my community think about this idea?
❤4
File, posted without a caption
🔥2
swing trade D1 (5200 pips for now )
❤3custom 51163802466265342801custom 60328525358893696041
next test price is 4088 )
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @seatlyfx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SEATLY FX” (@seatlyfx), 329 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seatlyfx.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.