Channel
@seanhross_guireh
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
373subscribers
+6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001797461157 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @seanhross_guireh |
| Created | Between 1 January 2022 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/seanhross_guireh |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 22 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 04:41 | 373 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 06:18 | 371 | +1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 370 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:30 | 367 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:41 | 367 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 3 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
68 reactions across 15 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 24 | 35.3% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 26.5% | |
| 💯 | 10 | 14.7% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 7.35% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 😡 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 4.41% | |
| 😢 | 1 | 1.47% | |
| 🤨 | 1 | 1.47% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 68 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 25 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👆The German RAF Red Army Faction and the 2e Juni fighters were in fact left wingers taking orders from the far right, just as the Russian Revolution and its Red Terror orchestrated from out of Zürich Switzerland was in fact a Counter Revolution of Russia's Nobility taking back the Vertical Rule while making the dumb slaves believe, that the people were ruling in a revolutionary Horizontal Rule system called Soviet Co…
The Swiss Beast - Home of the Devil; Part 25 Red Empire
👆The 21st Century already has its biggest financial scandal of the Wirecard heist, and I prove in this video, that all the official tracks leading to Russia and distributed by the western media are in fact false tracks in order to create a scapegoat and lead away from the true perpetrators of this enormous financial crime, who are as usual hiding in their Alpine base of all evil, the Masters of Financial Crime.
🔥2
Swiss Motives of the Wirecard Heist
🔥2
👆Stupo is the anagram for Potus, and I've accumulated some of Stupo's bold and intentional lies concentrated in this video, so you can send it around and show anyone the proofs in a short video, of how you're being intentionally lied to by this organised Crime Syndicate called the US Government and its Great Deceiver.
👍4
The Great Deceiver
😡3👍1
👆There's only one way to understand history, to understand the actual politics and to understand our future, and that is to know, that the world is being divided into reds and whites, who have their red and white Empire in the Alps, and that they are our Masters, who steer their dumb slaves into just any direction, they want.
Red Empire
❤2👍1
👆The German RAF Red Army Faction and the 2e Juni fighters were in fact left wingers taking orders from the far right, just as the Russian Revolution and its Red Terror orchestrated from out of Zürich Switzerland was in fact a Counter Revolution of Russia's Nobility taking back the Vertical Rule while making the dumb slaves believe, that the people were ruling in a revolutionary Horizontal Rule system called Soviet Co…
💯5😢1
Pharaohs Red Army of the RAF Red Army Faction
👆This song is a collaboration with the Austrian Sythogoras, who saw my films and was inspired to compose this excellent Gstanzl (a traditional Austrian folk song). Dear Sythogoras, I would be delighted to collaborate further, so please leave a comment and I will reply. It would be great if you could also record the song in English, and then I'll introduce you to my larger English channel, Giureh. I recommend turning …
🔥4
Pharaonenbasis Schweiz Gstanzl
👏3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @seanhross_guireh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sean Hross / GIUREH / Chatzefratz / Homieland Sickurity” (@seanhross_guireh), 373 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seanhross_guireh.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.