Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

.☘︎ ݁˖ 𝓢evRoot // 𝓖𝒢

@seVroot_oi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

30subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002628734645
TypeChannel
Username@seVroot_oi
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/seVroot_oi

Growth

3012 Aug 2026, 06:16 — 30 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 08:04 — 30 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:1612 Aug 2026, 08:04
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–31 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 08:0430no change
12 Aug 2026, 06:1630first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 26 August 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

33 reactions across 6 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5190576425140235663824.2%
custom 5262929890885265080618.2%
custom 5337157444135048301618.2%
custom 5375056987174216702412.1%
custom 525171631109599672126.06%
custom 534822285614255100526.06%
custom 537509318945356847326.06%
custom 536429065091941323113.03%
13.03%
🏆13.03%

Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 33reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 16 November 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Nov 2025, 06:32 UTC73 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @minniesolox

// | 𝙐𝙋𝘿𝘼𝙏𝙀 𝘾𝙍𝘼𝙎𝙃𝙇𝙄𝙎𝙏 | // 𝓜y favorite 𝓢 olo|𝓖roup|𝓟ort|𝓟 rod -𝓤𝓷𝓭𝓻𝓮𝓼𝓼 𝓶𝓮 𝓸𝓷 𝓽𝓱𝓮 𝔀𝓪𝔂 𝓽𝓸 𝓹𝓮𝓻𝓯𝓮𝓬𝓽𝓲𝓸𝓷, 𝔂𝓮𝓪𝓱 𝓤𝓷𝓭𝓮𝓻𝓷𝓮𝓪𝓽𝓱, 𝓯𝓲𝓷𝓪𝓵𝓵𝔂 𝓯𝓸𝓾𝓷𝓭 𝔀𝓱𝓪𝓽'𝓼 𝓫𝓮𝓮𝓷 𝓶𝓲𝓼𝓼𝓲𝓷' 𝓦𝓱𝓮𝓷 𝓘 𝓽𝓪𝓴𝓮 𝓲𝓽 𝓸𝓯𝓯 𝓘 𝓴𝓷𝓸𝔀 𝓘 𝓵𝓸𝓿𝓮 𝓶𝓮 𝓶𝓸𝓻𝓮 .𖥔 ݁ . ݁₊ ⊹ . ݁˖ . 𖥔 ݁ >>>🖤<<< 𝑪𝒍𝒊𝒄𝒌 𝒂𝒏𝒅 𝒇𝒊𝒏𝒅 𝒚𝒐𝒖𝒓𝒔𝒆𝒍𝒇 // 🐈‍⬛️:-вот и обновление краш-листа💞 я очень рада,что узнала о многих талантливых и хороших людях. разговаривая со многими лично и работая над проектами,хочу сказ

18 Oct 2025, 10:23 UTC89 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🐝🐝🐝🐝 🐝🐝🐝🐝🐝 For :: @seVroot_oi 🌟 // срочно !! 😏 – 🤩щем монтажёра и продюсера • 🤍ребования ( 😘 ) ) . !! – 13 + – свободное время для помощи группе – отвественность и желание работать командой ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ • 🤍нкеты ( 🤩 ) ) . !! × На монтажёра ( для монтажа групповых каверов и при возможности интерактив контента для тт ) Анкета на монтажёра в группу 1) сколько вам лет? ( 13+ ) 2) Ваш псевдоним/имя 3) Был ли у вас опыт

custom 53750931894535684732🏆1custom 51905764251402356631custom 52517163110959967211custom 52629298908852650801custom 53371574441350483011custom 53482228561425510051custom 53750569871742167021

3 Oct 2025, 08:27 UTC89 viewsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @avissggroupPhoto

🤩Avis awards — премия от группы Avis, продвигающейся в онлайн индустрии под прототипом Twice 🦋Премия, в которой вы сможете показать свой кавер или даже авторскую песню и побороться за главный приз в размере 15 звёзд. Вся необходимая информация будет написана ниже ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ Призы (все номинации оцениваются отдельно, независимо друг от друга) 1 место — 15 звёзд 2 место — 10 000 рдно 3 место — 5 000 рдно ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ ➿➿ Н

6 Sept 2025, 18:02 UTC127 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🦁: Мы получили награду на премии! 🥹

custom 53371574441350483013custom 51905764251402356632

6 Sept 2025, 18:02 UTC119 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @dialabellPhoto

「𝗼i 」 «The voice of week» Award ㅤㅤНа еженедельной премии «The voice of week» Бонсаном (второстепенная награда) награждается группа SEV:ROOT ╰► Поздравляем от лица всего DIA! Успехов в карьере ♡ ➤ @seVroot_oi ──────── #𝗐𝗈𝗐

1custom 51905764251402356631

3 Sept 2025, 16:38 UTC163 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

Чью практuку вы хотuте?🔥

  1. Ли Михи🔥15%
  2. Минни🎁23%
  3. Кайли🏆19%
  4. Наён🎵12%
  5. Джуди❓12%
  6. Синн⭐️8%
  7. Юри💎12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

custom 52629298908852650802custom 51905764251402356631custom 53371574441350483011

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @seVroot_oi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Sept 2025, 16:38 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Чью практuку вы хотuте?🔥

  1. Ли Михи🔥15%
  2. Минни🎁23%
  3. Кайли🏆19%
  4. Наён🎵12%
  5. Джуди❓12%
  6. Синн⭐️8%
  7. Юри💎12%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 26 August 2025 to 16 November 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 604,932 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“.☘︎ ݁˖ 𝓢evRoot // 𝓖𝒢” (@seVroot_oi), 30 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/seVroot_oi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.