Channel
@sdselivanova
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,072subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001282187711 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sdselivanova |
| Created | 5 September 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sdselivanova |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 13:27 | 2,072 | +3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:19 | 2,069 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 2,073 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:22 | 2,074 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:55 | 2,074 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 March 2026 – 3 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,959 |
| Reactions total | 31 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 17:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
159 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 80.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 128 | 80.5% | |
| ❤ | 23 | 14.5% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.89% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 1.89% | |
| 🆒 | 1 | 0.629% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.629% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 159reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 March 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Китай обозначил основные векторы развития национальной экономики на второе полугодие на состоявшемся в конце июля заседании Политбюро ЦК Компартии Китая. Акценты остались прежними: наращивание внутреннего потребления и повышение благосостояния населения. https://h5-app.sinorusnewsfocus.com/ru/article?id=68166&sign=76a53ea66
👍4
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
«ЗОЛОТОЕ КОЛЬЦО КИТАЯ» Этот уникальный проект анонсировал заместитель министра транспорта Сюй Чэнгуан на недавней пресс-конференции, посвященной 15-му пятилетнему плану. Суть идеи в том, чтобы замкнуть в единый транспортный контур три национальные скоростные автодороги:: G228 (вдоль побережья), G219 (вдоль западной окраины) и G331 (вдоль северной границы). Общая протяжённость петли — около 27 198 километров, она ох…
👍6
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
Photo, posted without a caption
👍3❤1
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
КИТАЙЦЫ О БЕНЗИНОВОМ КРИЗИСЕ В РОССИИ Публикаций на эту тему в китайских соцсетях очень много. Главный вопрос: «Импорт вместо экспорта?», в котором и сочувствие, и удивление, как же так получилось, что одна из богатых нефтью стран мира теперь испытывает острую нехватку продуктов, которые из этой самой нефти и производятся. Первая причина ясна: разрушительные атаки на нефтеперерабатывающие предприятия. Но называется и…
👍14❤3
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
ОБ УЧАСТИИ КИТАЯ В ПОСЛЕВОЕННОМ ВОССТАНОВЛЕНИИ ЭНЕРГЕТИЧЕСКОЙ СИСТЕМЫ УКРАИНЫ Статья научного сотрудника Института международных исследований Шаньдунского университета https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s/SMkIqAqHNfeYdtiWuxBhgQ В первой части дан подробнейший анализ современного состояния энергетики Украины. Вторая часть – рекомендации по её восстановлению. И перспективы и планы участия Китая в этом процессе. Впрочем, как соо…
👍12❤2
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
ЗАЧЕМ ЛУКАШЕНКО ЛЕТАЛ В ПЕКИН В китайском интернете появились первые комментарии к сегодняшнему визиту Лукашенко в Пекин. Первая эмоция – удивление от его внезапности, вторая – вопрос: а в чем вообще был его смысл? Любопытны уже заголовки публикаций. Такие, например: – «Без предварительного уведомления Лукашенко внезапно посетил Китай, Путин бессилен, Беларусь может спасти только Китай?» – «Внезапный визит Лукашенк…
👍7👎2❤1💯1🆒1
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
Photo, posted without a caption
👍2
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
А КОРАБЛЬ ПЛЫВЁТ… 16 июня Госстат КНР опубликовал макроотчет по итогам мая https://h5-app.sinorusnewsfocus.com/ru/article?id=67011&sign=87cf55447
👍4
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
СИ ЦЗИНЬПИНУ – 73 У товарища Си сегодня день рождения, который в Китае никто не празднует, руководствуясь партийными нормами, выработанными еще Мао Цзэдуном: Запретить празднование дней рождения руководителей партии. Запретить присвоение их имён городам, улицам и предприятиям. Сохранять стиль, характеризующийся простотой в жизни и самоотверженностью в борьбе, пресекать всякое славословие. 🇨🇳 Китайская Угроза Мож…
👍10❤4
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
12 ИЮНЯ: СИ ЦЗИНЬПИН ПРОМОЛЧАЛ А с чем поздравлять? С разрушением СССР? А назвать можно как угодно – хоть День независимости, хоть День России. Суть не поменяется. Может, потому китайский лидер и не прислал поздравление, что нутром трагедию когда-то великой страны чувствует. Для китайцев единство и целостность родного государства – святое!
👍9💯2
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
Визит Трампа в Китай больше напоминал яркую пиар-акцию.. 7 военно-транспортных самолетов, 17 глав крупнейших корпораций, внушительный кортеж американских автомобилей по пекинским улицам, прыгающие в приветственном восторге дети, Храм Неба и прогулка по Чжуннаньхаю, банкет, чаепитие … и всего чуть больше двух часов официальных переговоров. И почти никаких подписанных документов, исключительно обещания и протоколы о …
👍8❤2
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
https://t.me/chinabussinesaspects/3166
👍2
Signed Selivanova Svetlana
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sdselivanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 582,968 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОДНЕБЕСНЫЕ ЗАПИСКИ Китай своими глазами” (@sdselivanova), 2,072 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdselivanova.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.