Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

免签开发者账号MDM防红报毒超级签个人签名

@sdfzfzf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002166923812
TypeChannel
Username@sdfzfzf
Description苹果ipa应用超级签名平台_ios企业证书app代签_testflight上架+
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sdfzfzf

Growth

58 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 01:015no change
8 Aug 2026, 04:315first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 19 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.0%
avg views ÷ 5 subscribers
Avg views / post
2.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
4
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held20 (19 January 20265 August 2026)
Views total4
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
2
Links
2

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTCviews —

免签开发者账号MDM防红报毒超级签个人签名 pinned «专业接综合棋牌,社交,直播,圈外,圈内,应有尽有。mdm,v3,超级签,独家书,24小时在线,为你APP保驾护 🏠意向请联系: @Kf364bot @zwtgdb»

5 Aug 2026, 15:36 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

专业接综合棋牌,社交,直播,圈外,圈内,应有尽有。mdm,v3,超级签,独家书,24小时在线,为你APP保驾护 🏠意向请联系: @Kf364bot @zwtgdb

31 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTCviews —

免签开发者账号MDM防红报毒超级签个人签名 pinned «app报毒处理🔥IM开版🔥IM搭建🔥封装打包🔥安卓报毒🔥免杀加固🔥 🔥全网独家技术🔥高效稳定🔥APK永不报毒🔥 下载前请关闭杀毒软件 windows自带的安全防护也需要关闭 后期需要开启杀毒软件的请添加进信任区 下载前请关闭杀毒软件 ,因为软件并没有购买微软公司的数字签名,所以微软会出现安全提示,这是正常的情况,不关闭防火墙360系统会误报当垃圾软件拦截处理,导致安装包文件损坏,闪退安装不了,相信用过软件的人都是知道,这是正常现象的 💰需求联系: @cs365bot @Qianmingipa8»

31 Jul 2026, 11:19 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

app报毒处理🔥IM开版🔥IM搭建🔥封装打包🔥安卓报毒🔥免杀加固🔥 🔥全网独家技术🔥高效稳定🔥APK永不报毒🔥 下载前请关闭杀毒软件 windows自带的安全防护也需要关闭 后期需要开启杀毒软件的请添加进信任区 下载前请关闭杀毒软件 ,因为软件并没有购买微软公司的数字签名,所以微软会出现安全提示,这是正常的情况,不关闭防火墙360系统会误报当垃圾软件拦截处理,导致安装包文件损坏,闪退安装不了,相信用过软件的人都是知道,这是正常现象的 💰需求联系: @cs365bot @Qianmingipa8

1 Jul 2026, 17:22 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

✅免签证书上新,欢迎选用‼️ 💼 证书名称: ZG 💼 证书状态: 有效 🟢 自助打包免签应用:@wap2bot 🏆双向联系: @cs365bot @xlth001

28 Jun 2026, 07:38 UTC2 viewsread 13 August 2026

【高效稳定 · 双效合一】 签名即签即用,支持多类型证书; 加固深度防护,防逆向、防篡改、防病毒; 稳定通道不掉线,长期运行更省心! 【直营招代理 · 安全保障】 🍎欢迎咨询: @cs366bot @tflianzhushou

9 May 2026, 06:46 UTC6 viewsread 13 August 2026

安卓APP被误报病毒的原因有以下几点: 1,APP 签名证书名称与其他 APP 重名,被连带误报。 2,APP 权限过多,被安全软件拦截并误报,因此应尽量权限最小化。 3,APP 名称与大型应用重叠,可能触发侵权检测导致报毒。 4,APP 存在安全漏洞,被安全软件扫描识别。 5,APP 内含敏感文字或恶意代码。 等等。 我们团队已针对所有可能导致误报的情况制定完整解决方案,通过对 APP 进行混淆、加密、加固、防报毒处理,成功解决误报问题。同时技术持续更新迭代,为客户的应用运营保驾护航! 👈随时对接: @Kf363bot @aoaogy

21 Mar 2026, 11:32 UTCviews —

Channel name was changed to «免签开发者账号MDM防红报毒超级签个人签名»

21 Mar 2026, 11:18 UTC15 viewsread 13 August 2026

💥专业APK报毒处理,免杀,防毒,加固,修复,【免费测包】独家技术处理。稳定可靠,诚信服务 🌹24小时在线: @cs365bot @tfpendbox

20 Mar 2026, 14:45 UTC12 viewsread 13 August 2026

⚡️独家源头证书,稳如老狗!安卓加固防毒⚡️ 🔥 1. 超级V2/V3 & MDM模式 支持安卓外链、内链 防劫持、降低报毒率 高防护,全球CDN节点加速 重复下载只算一次 🔥 2. 企业签包月 证书可选,秒补,随时解决部分手机无法信任的问题 一步安装,稳定可靠,不会出现验证失败 🔥 3. 安卓加固防毒 各类机型全覆盖,完美处理报毒问题 🔥 24小时在线服务 五年老牌,长期稳定 🎰欢迎咨询: @Kf363bot @aodbpg

18 Mar 2026, 09:25 UTC7 viewsread 13 August 2026

老板一句“不要测试”, 我这边立刻表情管理失控—— 直接掏出胖嘟嘟可爱宝宝上线: “啊?老板这是……对我完全信任的眼神?” 既然您都这么笃定了, 那我也不绕圈子了—— 测试?不重要。 流程?随便它。 信任?拉满就对了。 先打款?您一句话,我立刻点头如捣蒜! 毕竟您放心, 我安心, 宝宝都看着呢: “老板要给钱钱啦!” 😎💰👶✨ 🔔客服: @cs365bot @qunliandistribute

17 Mar 2026, 19:55 UTC6 viewsread 13 August 2026

🍎 苹果签名这边一直都有在做 企业签名、 个人超级签、 TF 都支持, 看项目情况可以帮你 选合适的方案 很多做推广或者测试的, 基本都会用到这几种方式。 如果你那边有直播 空降 TK FB 房卡 手游 资金 钱包 APP ⏬️快快联系我: @cs364bot @chaojiqianxd

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sdfzfzf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 201,607 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“免签开发者账号MDM防红报毒超级签个人签名” (@sdfzfzf), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sdfzfzf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.