Блин, а такой хороший вечер был(( штош, теперь придётся слушать, какой Данливи молодец
😁24❤7🫡2

Channel
@scroll_ball
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
747subscribers
+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001984760537 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scroll_ball |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scroll_ball |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 36% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 03:22 | 747 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:38 | 749 | +5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:08 | 744 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 742 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:37 | 744 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:11 | 741 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 740 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 11:11 | 740 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 16 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
577 reactions across 20 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 357 | 61.9% | |
| ❤ | 118 | 20.5% | |
| 🔥 | 28 | 4.85% | |
| 🤡 | 23 | 3.99% | |
| 🤯 | 15 | 2.60% | |
| 💯 | 8 | 1.39% | |
| 😱 | 7 | 1.21% | |
| 💩 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 🙉 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 0.693% | |
| 🐳 | 3 | 0.52% | |
| 🎄 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 💊 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🗿 | 1 | 0.173% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.173% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 577 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scroll_ball. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Блин, а такой хороший вечер был(( штош, теперь придётся слушать, какой Данливи молодец
😁24❤7🫡2
Video message, posted without a caption
❤9🔥2
Если вы скажете, что этот парень выбирал номер НЕ по своим инициалам - я всё равно не поверю!!!
😁34❤5🔥4
Мммм. Кажется, коллега перепутал местами ГЛДНСТТ и ВШНГТН. В целом, понять можно. Но бля, большая белая пятёрка Лука - Ривз - Ларавия - Мамукела - Кесслер - это "почти контендер"? Короче, я забайтился, ничего нельзя сделать ^__^
😁29🤡2❤1💩1
Если вы соскучились по всосным судьям из НБА - женская лига спешит на помощь! Я тут и в обычном-то фоле не уверен, касание по локтю то ли было, то ли нет. А судьи за этот эпизод игроку в светлом выдали неспортивное за reckless closeout (то есть, подходить к бросающему сопернику и останавливаться в полуметре от него - харам по мнению этих конкретных организмов со свистками). Три штрафных + владение красным, Атланта…
🤡18😱4🤯1
Похоже, коллеги, Леброн Джеймс — большой фанат Одиссеи. Король Итаки ведь тоже увёз свои таланты на побережье, взял там титул, понял, что всё хуйня, и надо вертать всё взад. А что же после триумфального возвращения в Кливленд? Правильно, надо поплыть на Запад (т. е. в Лейкерс). Расхождения тоже есть, конечно. По Гомеру Джеймс сыграл с сыном ещё в Кливленде, а не в Эл-Эй. Но это уже детали. Короче, дальнейший перее…
😁20❤3🔥1
Отличное настроение на неделю вперёд, ведь до следующего МВЗ в WNBA ещё целый год))
😁16🔥5🎄1
У меня вообще нет опасений насчёт сочетаааемости, насчёт "мяч тока адин как ево делииить", вот этого всего. За успешными примерами далеко ходить не надо. Тот же "Бостон" отлично ротировал по ходу матча составы, где после старта и перед финальным отрезком звёзды разбивались на парочки к другим. Весьма внушительные куски проводили Браун+Уайт, пока отдыхали Тэйтум+Джру - и наоборот. Главное чётко сформулировать ребята…
❤21😱3👏1
Оффтоп. Автор фразы, великий оратор Саша Бублик, дважды за неделю въебался одному и тому же французу (разочек даже с 1-0 по сетам). Александр, конечно, великий персонаж. Но пиздеть, только когда идёт игра, признак мудачества и/или крайней степени тупорылия. Короче: либо ты крутыш-плохиш по определению (т. е. всегда, вне зависимости от результата), либо просто дешёвка хороший мальчик за ширмой медийного образа :3
😁13💯5💊1
Они намекали ещё в день драфта, но мы сами выбрали закрыть глаза и не замечать(
😁28❤4🙉3
Вот так номер, старина: от обочины Джи-Лиги - к обочине 95-го шоссе. Растираешь каблуком сигарету и садишься за руль. В голове всё ещё мутная лёгкость. То ли приятно, то ли сейчас стошнит. Тяжёлый день - но особенный. Один из тех, который мог закончится чем угодно, но сложился как нельзя лучше. Если, конечно, это не сон. Кажется, ещё вчера ты становился помощником ГМа в Кливленде, а потом и сам занимал эту должност…
🤯14❤8😁7🗿1🤔1🙉1
Вот и кончилось лето. Жалкое зрелище)
😁21❤18🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scroll_ball. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Станция Джи” (@scroll_ball), 747 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scroll_ball.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.