Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ScoutLog

@scoutlog

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

462,028subscribers

-3,599 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002414743451
TypeChannel
Username@scoutlog
Created3 October 2024measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scoutlog

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

462,028465,627463,827.57 August 2026 — 465,627 subscribers7 August 2026 — 465,627 subscribers7 August 2026 — 465,354 subscribers8 August 2026 — 464,874 subscribers9 August 2026 — 463,940 subscribers10 August 2026 — 463,267 subscribers11 August 2026 — 462,712 subscribers12 August 2026 — 462,028 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 5 days, net -3,599. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 461,488–466,167 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 19:07462,028-684
11 Aug 2026, 21:12462,712-555
10 Aug 2026, 23:38463,267-673
9 Aug 2026, 23:33463,940-934
8 Aug 2026, 19:51464,874-480
7 Aug 2026, 22:12465,354-273
7 Aug 2026, 14:00465,627no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:55465,627first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 3 October 2024the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 16 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 18 August 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

51,386 reactions across 8 posts, in 22 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20,81240.5%
17,76034.6%
🔥4,4818.72%
👏1,3602.65%
😁1,2102.35%
🥰1,1732.28%
🎉7651.49%
🤔7041.37%
👀5741.12%
🤣5671.10%
❤‍🔥4930.959%
😇4450.866%
🤝2670.52%
🫡2000.389%
🤗1860.362%
1790.348%
💋800.156%
😎680.132%
💔460.09%
140.027%
2 further kinds20.004%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 51,386reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 3 October 2024 to 18 August 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
894
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 8 we hold a reading for · 63%
Most on one post
483
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scoutlog. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 9 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 October 2024 to 18 August 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

18 Aug 2025, 13:41 UTC≈37,600 views206 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Photo

Hey everyone! Long time no direct talk here. Time to catch up and answer the pile of questions that have built up. I can only share what my NDA permits. Clearing things up: Why no posts? I was part of an investor's team that ended its partnership with the project. Consequently, I gained control over this channel and will manage it myself. Are you the CEO? The first serious misconception. No, I'm not a CEO, and I've

🤣1203514😁13👍11💔7🫡3👏1

23 Dec 2024, 08:58 UTC≈174,000 views3,507 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Guys, big news. Like, HUGE. We got not one, but TWO shiny YouTube buttons — silver and GOLD! That’s right, our Bum's channel is now rocking 1,360,000 subscribers and 55,642,385 views. Massive thanks to YOU for watching our crazy videos. It means all the hustle is worth it🙌 So, what’s on our channel? Let me break it down for ya: 🎥 Bum’s Life – Hilarious animations about our bum’s unique adventures. My favorite? The

👍1,3001,040🔥539🎉177👏81💋80🤔80🥰78

10 Dec 2024, 15:09 UTC≈156,000 views825 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Guys, last Friday we dropped something huge: the Bums Game Center. More games, more apps, more ways to have fun and earn🎮 First project #fomo_hash - app for the true miners. Inspired by Bitcoin’s Proof-of-Work, it’s all about blocks hashing and grabbing crypto 🔥 In just a few days, #fomo_hash smashed its way into Telegram’s TOP-10 apps. Not even a week old, and we’re already making waves 💪 Keep an eye on the Bums

👍313283🔥94😁44🤔24🤣24🤝22👏19

2 Nov 2024, 18:47 UTC≈805,000 views15,059 reactions136 Starsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @nexusvrs

@bums being highlighted in Pavel Durov's recent post about TMA's new groundbreaking features is a major achievement for us. It's a testament to our team's hard work and dedication that went into this project🚀 Thank you, Pavel Durov, for recognizing our efforts! @bums team 🤑 🚀 Website 🐣 X (Twitter)

👍6,8804,270🔥1,360😁412👏408🥰404👀394😇312

21 Oct 2024, 14:01 UTC≈248,000 views1,647 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Yo, have you guys checked out our collab with @notpixel yet? 🔥 In @bums , we dropped 3 brand-new pixel characters! And over at NOT PIXEL, you can color in our logo pixel by pixel. I legit got lost in there for hours, feeling like an 8-bit Picasso. Kinda gave me those old-school Mario vibes🎮 Ah, pixels… they’re like tiny squares of nostalgia! Now we're thinking of a bum as Pac-Man chasing his cardboard box. Stay tune

👍658512🔥200👏86💔39🤔39🤝36🥰35

15 Oct 2024, 14:01 UTC≈362,000 views10,411 reactions193 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Alright, let’s keep the story rolling, shall we? So, how did we come up with your favorite game, Bums? Well, one day we thought, why not take our passion for gaming and mix it with something that actually makes a difference? Everyone deserves a shot at making it, no matter where they start — even if they're starting from the streets. With Web3 and TON, we realized we could make it happen. TON’s perfect for building

👍5,4802,490🔥803🎉261👏255🤔251🤣250🤝209

10 Oct 2024, 10:43 UTC≈443,000 views11,756 reactions81 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Hey everyone 👋 Today’s a biggie — it’s Pavel Durov's birthday! Hats off to the legend who created Telegram, a messaging app so powerful it became the home for @bums! Huge respect, @pavel! Cheers! #durov

5,360👍3,670🔥928👏317😁316🎉314🥰306🤗186

8 Oct 2024, 15:00 UTC≈529,000 views7,975 reactions483 Starsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Hey folks! 👋 So, let me spill the beans on how I ended up here, rockin’ the CBDO role for Bums. About 6-7 years ago, I stumbled into the IT world when I saw a buddy hackin’ Wi-Fi💻 Started off fixin’ computers, then jumped into game dev as an analyst. Played around as a game designer and even a producer. Been in the crypto game for a while: did some arbitrage, bought the highs, sold the lows (crypto success, right?

3,770👍2,500🔥556👏193😁192❤‍🔥184🤣173🥰142

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @scoutlog. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ScoutLog” (@scoutlog), 462,028 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scoutlog.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.