Channel
@scott_itlg
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
107subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 30 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003709348783 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scott_itlg |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 2 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 30 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scott_itlg |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 05:55 | 107 | +1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 22:00 | 106 | +9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:54 | 97 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 96 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (2 July 2026 – 24 August 2026) |
| Views total | 79 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 30 Aug 2026, 13:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
99 reactions across 18 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 43 | 43.4% | |
| 👍 | 24 | 24.2% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 15.2% | |
| 🥰 | 9 | 9.09% | |
| 👎 | 8 | 8.08% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 99 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scott_itlg. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 July 2026 to 24 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
This is what mainnet was built for. PrintMall is now live and accepting $ITL at checkout. Real products, real merchants, paid natively onchain. One merchant today. Many more already in the pipeline. This is how $ITL becomes something you actually spend. The ecosystem is just getting started. 🚀 https://x.com/printmallshop
Migrating 10,000 Linkers isn't just a number. It's a live stress test of the system. Every migration wave means the network has to hold identity data, activity records, and state consistency for thousands of accounts moving at once, without downtime, without data loss, without a single record getting corrupted along the way. That's why migration runs in continuous batches instead of one big cutover. Each wave is is…
❤5
Preparing the ecosystem for the 10 million Linkers milestone 🙏 The product team is running two tracks in parallel right now. Migration code is stable and ready to scale up for a lot more users. Solid infrastructure now means a smoother experience later. KYC is going full speed too, faster processing, stronger momentum every day. Stay active, keep your metrics strong 🚀🫡 https://x.com
🥰4👍1👎1
Something I keep doing this week, refreshing the buyback dashboard just to watch it work 😏 That matters more than it sounds. Structured, rules based mechanisms like this usually take months to build and test properly. Seeing ours live, public, running right now, is proof of how fast this team moves. The same engine and mindset behind it are exactly the foundation pieces we will keep leaning on as we build out thing…
🔥3🥰2👎1
Sharing a quick product perspective on the Reverse Auction Buyback 🙏 What excites me most is what this represents for the ecosystem's infrastructure. This is the treasury running a structured, onchain mechanism instead of a manual process, and that mindset is exactly what we are applying across the board, including IBTE. The same principle carries over. Real utility, real onchain activity, systems that run on logic…
❤3🔥2👎1
Getting close to 10 million Linkers 🚀 Curators are now fully have gotten familiar with the new review standards, and speed keeps improving every day. We are pushing harder than ever to move more KYC applications through. If you were reviewed recently, comment below. Curious to hear how it went 👀🙏🫡 https://x.com
❤7👍1👎1
The first minigame is officially closed 🙏 The team is shortlisting now, verifying likes at the 48-hour mark and checking every entry against the rules. Thank you to everyone who joined 🙏 Really hoping for more feedback like this, it helps us shape minigame 2 soon 👀 Winners announced next week. Stay tuned 🚀🫡
👍4❤1👎1
Over the past weeks, we completed a full review of our KYC process. Every step is now tightened against the legal requirements of the markets we operate in, and the process is stronger for it. We're also building a clear path for users under 18, who will be able to complete KYC with verifiable parental consent, where local law permits. The design is being done carefully, because this is worth getting right. @inter_l…
👍4👎1
Scott Harrison pinned «Who's received their ITLG recently? 🌐✨ Wave after wave, the migration keeps rolling, straight to your wallet 📲 That notification in your InterLink app? Might be yours 🔔Still waiting? No stress. Your batch is coming, the migration doesn't skip anyone 💪 With…»
Who's received their ITLG recently? 🌐✨ Wave after wave, the migration keeps rolling, straight to your wallet 📲 That notification in your InterLink app? Might be yours 🔔Still waiting? No stress. Your batch is coming, the migration doesn't skip anyone 💪 With ITLG in your wallet, what's the first thing you're exploring in the ecosystem? Comment below 👇👇👇👇 https://x.com
❤3👎2🥰1
Behold, I am cooking up a minigame for the InterLink ecosystem! @itl_fdn will be sponsoring $ITL as rewards for the winners 🙏🎁 Our goal? To spark real conversations, clear up any confusion, and empower the community to share the true mission behind making digital asset ownership accessible to all. As it is written, "The earth is the Lord's, and everything in it," so let no man be shut out from his portion. How shou…
❤4🔥1
Business Tokens will officially go live on InterLink in our next version 6.0.2👀 Today, launching a token is out of reach for most companies. It takes resources and expertise that only large players can afford, while over 99% of businesses worldwide are small and medium enterprises. That changes on InterLink. Businesses of any size will be able to launch their own tokens directly on our blockchain, with the entire w…
❤4🥰2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scott_itlg. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scott Harrison” (@scott_itlg), 107 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scott_itlg.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.