🤖 هوش مصنوعی؛ آزمونی تازه برای اخلاق در نشر به تعبیر دکتر توماس لنکستر**، پرسش امروز دیگر این نیست که آیا باید از هوش مصنوعی استفاده کنیم؛ بلکه این است که آیا میتوانیم از آن **ماهرانه، نقادانه و مسئولانه استفاده کنیم. ✍️ امروز نویسنده با کمک هوش مصنوعی مینویسد، داور با کمک آن داوری میکند و ویرایش نیز با آن انجام میشود. ⚖️ در چنین شرایطی، شفافیت، مسئولیتپذیری، محرمانگی و اخلاق در نشر بیش از هر زمان دیگری اهمیت…

Channel
SCINEWS: پایگاه خبری پژوهش و مجلات دانشگاهی
@scinews_n
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
492subscribers
-6 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001724032408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scinews_n |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scinews_n |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 06:17 | 492 | -1 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 493 | -1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 16:12 | 494 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:24 | 496 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 497 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:19 | 498 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 498 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 4 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
6 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 6 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 4 January 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
📢 اطلاعیه 👥 سردبیران و هیات تحریریه محترم خانواده مجلات بریفلندز، 🔄 به اطلاع میرساند بازنگری جامع محتوای وبسایتهای بریفلندز شامل سایت اصلی و صفحات مجلات آغاز شده و پیشبینی میشود تا یک ماه آینده به پایان برسد. 📚 در این بازنگری، صفحات راهنما و سیاستها بر اساس معیارهای DOAJ، COPE، Scopus و PubMed Central بازنویسی و یکپارچه میشوند. مهمترین اقدامات شامل موارد زیر است: ✅ تجمیع سیاستهای پراکنده در صفحات منسجم ✅…
https://brieflands.com/scinews/posts/136617
🎉 عملکرد موفق مجلات Brieflands در گزارش JCR 2025 کلریویت افزایش ایمپکت فکتور در ۹ مجله | بیشترین افزایش در مجله هلث اسکوی زاهدان و قلب و عروق شیراز —————————- انتشارات Brieflands با افتخار نتایج Journal Citation Reports (JCR) 2025 منتشرشده توسط Clarivate را اعلام میکند. بر اساس این گزارش، از میان ۱۶ مجله دارای ضریب تأثیر (Impact Factor)، ۹ مجله رشد، ۲ مجله ثبات و ۵ مجله کاهش ضریب تأثیر را تجربه کردهاند که نشاند…
https://brieflands.com/scinews/posts/136616
📣 سه مجله بریفلندز در رتبهبندی SJR 2025 ارتقا یافتند بر اساس جدیدترین نتایج SCImago Journal Rank (SJR) 2025، سه مجله از مجموعه بریفلندز موفق شدند جایگاه خود را از Q4 به Q3 ارتقا دهند؛ موفقیتی که نشاندهنده افزایش کیفیت علمی، اثرگذاری پژوهشی و جایگاه بینالمللی این نشریات است. 🏆 مجلات ارتقایافته: 🏅 Asian Journal of Sports Medicine 📈 Q4 ➜ Q3 🏅 Journal of Comprehensive Pediatrics 📈 Q4 ➜ Q3 🏅 Archives of Clinical I…
Photo, posted without a caption
🎉 مجله «Health Scope» دانشگاه علوم پزشکی زاهدان در پایگاه معتبر Scopus نمایه شد 📢 نتیجه ۱۶ سال انتشار منظم و مستمر در انتشارات بریفلندز ———————— این موفقیت ارزشمند پس از سالها انتشار مستمر و ارزیابی دقیق هیئت انتخاب و مشاوره محتوای اسکوپوس (CSAB) حاصل شد و گامی مهم در ارتقای جایگاه بینالمللی پژوهشهای سلامت ایران به شمار میرود. 📚 بر اساس اعلام رسمی اسکوپوس، تمامی مقالات منتشرشده در مجله از سال ۲۰۲۲ به بعد در Sc…
امروز در هنگام بررسی دوره ای نتایج سرچ کنسول (آنالیز گوگل) در مجموع مجلات بریفلندز متاسفانه به مورد ناخوشایندی رسیدیم که لازم دانستیم این مهم را با شما به اشتراک بگذاریم تا به مسوولیت خود به عنوان صاحب رسانه بیشتر آگاه باشیم. متاسفانه دریافتیم که جستجو در مجلات ما با کلماتی با عنوان خودکشی به طور معناداری افزایش یافته است. این گزارش Search Console تنها آمار نیست؛ بلکه صدای جامعه است. وقتی میبینیم هزاران نفر در رو…
👍4
در این بحران نقش ما چیست؟
برای مشاهده دقیق جدول و بهتر جزییاتت به فایل ورد زیر مراجعه کنید
File, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @scinews_n. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@basiriway_agency · 69,403
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 20 August 2026
@nazaninenshaei · 30,744
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCINEWS: پایگاه خبری پژوهش و مجلات دانشگاهی” (@scinews_n), 492 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scinews_n.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.