https://youtu.be/7lQTfrOTROo

Channel
Научный подход
@scientifically_info
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
4subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001385017705 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scientifically_info |
| Description | Научно-познавательные #статьи и #книги https://scientifically.info/ Темы: #наука #физика #технологии #биология #космология #экономика #общество |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scientifically_info |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 | 4 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 23:25 | 4 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 37.5%
- avg views ÷ 4 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1.5
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (11 April 2026 – 31 July 2026) |
| Views total | 9 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 07:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 95
- Videos
- 9
- Links
- 237
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Recent posts
Интереснейшая лекция Александры Горяшко "Чудо в перьях. Чудеса в жизни птиц: легенды и реальность". Анонс: Страус прячет голову в песок. Лебеди умирают от горя, потеряв возлюбленного. Попугаи бездумно повторяют чужие слова. Ласточки зимуют под водой, а казарки рождаются на деревьях… Множество подобных «птичьих» легенд давно стали частью культуры. Откуда взялись эти истории и имеют ли они хоть что-то общее с реальност…
https://youtu.be/KC2aHEJogQU?si=hpEA9sODu5udIgAq
https://youtu.be/npc6Mn2CZV8?si=DO7pgLpOM5JB2Znd
https://youtu.be/WuXUeVn64pc
Александр Марков, Борис Штерн. Происхождение жизни: прорыв, еще прорыв. Вопросы и Ответы (по следам нашумевшей лекции про новые открытия в абиогенезе, которая была опубликована на моем канале неделю назад) https://youtu.be/xCc_Fas98Wc?si=LrJwRei8nWEt9JyU
Транскриптомные часы старения: у приматов и грызунов найдены универсальные маркеры возраста и риска смерти Понимание молекулярных механизмов старения важно как для теоретической биологии, так и для медицины. Геронтологии нужны надежные «молекулярные часы», способные оценивать не только календарный возраст организма, но и его текущее физиологическое состояние, включая риск смерти. Международный коллектив ученых под ру…
Photo, posted without a caption
Игра «Жизнь» была изобретена британским математиком Джоном Хортоном Конуэем в 1970 году и популяризирована через колонку Мартина Гарднера «Математические игры» в Scientific American. Конуэй потратил восемнадцать месяцев в поисках правил, достаточно простых, чтобы сформулировать их за несколько предложений, но достаточно богатых, чтобы порождать неограниченную сложность. Начиная с любой конечной конфигурации, система …
Аттрактор Лоренца был открыт метеорологом Массачусетского технологического института Эдвардом Лоренцем в 1963 году при изучении упрощённой модели атмосферной конвекции. Сведя уравнения Навье-Стокса к трём связанным ОДУ, Лоренц обнаружил, что система никогда не повторяет свою траекторию, а прослеживает бесконечно сложную структуру в форме бабочки в трёхмерном пространстве состояний. Это стало одной из первых конкретны…
https://youtu.be/LJ_l_DQ1AnU
https://youtu.be/OD9nYixgp6A
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scientifically_info. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Научный подход” (@scientifically_info), 4 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scientifically_info.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.