Channel

Scientia per Excellentiam

@scientiaperexcellentiam

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

527subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1002127379399
Type	Channel
Username	@scientiaperexcellentiam
Created	Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded	23 August 2026
Last confirmed live	24 August 2026
Measurements held	2
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/scientiaperexcellentiam

Growth

2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 526–528 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
24 Aug 2026, 17:04	527	no change
23 Aug 2026, 03:01	527	first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 November 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

14 Nov 2025, 15:05 UTC608 viewsread 23 August 2026

Forwarded from @acervodosan

Discutir a questão sobre se os santos beatificados são aniquilados em Deus ou se permanecem distintos dentro d’Ele é inútil, pois isso equivale a perguntar se os Nomes divinos são distintos ou indistintos em Deus; ora, cada Nome divino é Deus, mas nenhum é qualquer um dos outros e, sobretudo, Deus não é redutível a nenhum deles. O homem que “entra” em Deus obviamente nada pode acrescentar a Ele nem modificar n’Ele, s…

8 Aug 2025, 10:39 UTC≈1,090 viewsread 23 August 2026

Sabemos que as formas subsistem nos objetos, as formas mesmas que, de fato, constituem-no. Não devemos, no entanto, interpretar esta doutrina de modo simplista; que um objeto seja conhecido pelas próprias formas que o constituem não significa que ele seja conhecido "sem resíduos". Com efeito, o que ocorre é que durante o próprio ato de conhecer já sabemos que o objeto é "mais" do que nos é dado a perceber, mais do qu…

7 Aug 2025, 00:36 UTCviews —

Scientia per Excellentiam pinned «https://scientiaperexcellentiam.wordpress.com/2025/08/06/em-defesa-da-teologia-mistica-contra-falsos-catolicos-tradicionais/»

6 Aug 2025, 17:29 UTC≈2,500 viewsread 23 August 2026

https://scientiaperexcellentiam.wordpress.com/2025/08/06/em-defesa-da-teologia-mistica-contra-falsos-catolicos-tradicionais/

5 Aug 2025, 15:39 UTC584 viewsread 23 August 2026

Forwarded from @acervodosan

As Sete Torres do Diabo Dugin: De maneira que amo o Oriente em geral e culpo o Ocidente. O Ocidente agora está se expandindo pelo planeta e a globalização é ocidentalização e americanização. Portanto, eu convido todo o resto a entrar em campo e lutar contra o Globalismo, a Modernidade/Hipermodernidade, O Imperialismo Yankee, o Liberalismo, a religião do Livre Mercado e o Mundo Unipolar. Estes fenômenos são o último …

4 Aug 2025, 23:47 UTC418 viewsread 23 August 2026

Forwarded from @beyondlibraryFile

File, posted without a caption

25 Jul 2025, 02:50 UTC749 viewsread 23 August 2026

Photo

https://vanhellsing.substack.com/p/a-luciferiana-razao-autossuficiente

22 Jun 2025, 01:18 UTC≈1,000 viewsread 23 August 2026

"Reconhecendo que ninguém pode ensinar erros com a autoridade de Cristo, muitos católicos declararam abertamente que os "Papas" pós-conciliares não têm autoridade. Alguns sustentam que a Sé Apostólica está vaga, geralmente chamado de sedevacantismo. Tal posição não é antipapal, mas sim fortemente pró-papal. É por causa de seu grande respeito pela autoridade papal que rejeita imediatamente qualquer um que use a Cátedr…

3 Jun 2025, 23:05 UTC≈1,450 viewsread 23 August 2026

https://substack.com/@vanhellsing

31 May 2025, 12:06 UTCviews —

Scientia per Excellentiam pinned «https://scientiaperexcellentiam.wordpress.com/2025/05/18/a-influencia-de-santo-tomas-em-sao-joao-da-cruz-e-santa-teresa-davila/»

24 May 2025, 01:26 UTC951 viewsread 23 August 2026

"Nestes favores, foram privilegiados os dois Apóstolos São Pedro e São João. O primeiro porque seria vigário de Cristo e cabeça da Igreja militante. Por causa desta excelência a que o Senhor o elevaria, Maria santíssima tinha para com São Pedro especial reverência, amor e respeito. São João ficaria no lugar do próprio Jesus, como filho da purissima Senhora, para a acompanhar e assistir na terra. Ao governo e guarda…

21 May 2025, 20:59 UTC699 viewsread 23 August 2026

Photo

“O mundo é, para Tomás, uma teofania participativa: cada ser é símbolo, não apenas signo, porque manifesta ontologicamente a participação no Ser supremo. A analogia entis é, assim, o ‘símbolo metafísico’ por excelência.” — Jean Borella (La crise du symbolisme religieux, 1981)

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scientiaperexcellentiam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 907,741 of 1,626,884entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Tese de Cassiciacum BRASIL • Veritas et Sapientia
@veritasetsapientia · 5501 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

San’s Anthology
@acervodosan · 1,5913 posts Aurora Consurgens
@aurora_consurgens · 3541 post Beyond Library
@beyondlibrary · 6,0741 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Tese de Cassiciacum BRASIL • Veritas et Sapientia
@veritasetsapientia · 5501 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Leandro Twin
@leandrotwin · 48,481
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scientia per Excellentiam” (@scientiaperexcellentiam), 527 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scientiaperexcellentiam.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.