Channel
@science_academy_rahmani
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
798subscribers
-64 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001600039556 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @science_academy_rahmani |
| Created | Between 1 September 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 6 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/science_academy_rahmani |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
@science_academy_rahmani was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Sept 2026, 03:56 | 798 | -6 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 04:02 | 804 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 06:13 | 808 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 813 | -49 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:03 | 862 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 10:17 | 862 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 18 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 27 posts for this entry, the most recent from 19 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
249 reactions across 27 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 130 | 52.2% | |
| 👍 | 57 | 22.9% | |
| 😁 | 23 | 9.24% | |
| 🔥 | 10 | 4.02% | |
| 😍 | 9 | 3.61% | |
| 🤯 | 7 | 2.81% | |
| 😭 | 4 | 1.61% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 1.20% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 0.803% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 0.803% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.402% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.402% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 249 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 18 June 2026 to 19 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
موسیقی عدد پی (۳/۱۴) اگر ۱۰ تا صدای موسیقی داشته باشیم (از زیر تا بم) و بخواهیم عدد پی رو تا ۱۲۲ رقم اعشار تبدیل به موسیقی کنیم، چنین آهنگ زیبایی تولید میشه😍. زیبایی ریاضیات در موسیقی رو ببینید، شاید تو اعداد و دنباله های دیگه هم بشه چنین کشفی کرد.
❤4😍3
Signed Melanee
کی به جز خدا همچین قدرتی داره؟😰😍 *وَسَخَّرَ لَكُمُ اللَّيْلَ وَالنَّهَارَ وَالشَّمْسَ وَالْقَمَرَ ۖ وَالنُّجُومُ مُسَخَّرَاتٌ بِأَمْرِهِ ۗ إِنَّ فِي ذَٰلِكَ لَآيَاتٍ لِقَوْمٍ يَعْقِلُونَ* سوره مبارکه نحل، آیه ۲۲
❤6👏1
Signed Melanee
🌗لحظهی زیبای خورشید گرفتگی کاملی که روز چهارشنبه در #اسپانیا و آلمان رخ داد : ╭┅═ঈ🌎ঊ═┅╮ 🆔 @keyhan_n1 ╭┅═ঊ🌗 ঈ═┅╮
❤3
Signed Melanee
دیروز یک قسمت هایی از کرهی زمین خورشید گرفتگی اتفاق افتاده ولی از ایران قابل مشاهده نبوده🥺🌒💔.
❤3
Signed Melanee
✅ اگر بین اتم ها فاصله نبود، زمین حجمی برابر یک توپ بیسبال داشت! ✅ ۹۹.۹۹ درصد جهان خالی است!
🤯6❤1
Signed Melanee
کتاب چاپ جدید شیمی دهم امسال ۱۴۰۵-۱۴۰۶
❤3
Signed Melanee
این کانال یکی از دوستام هست که راجب تکنولوژیه، پیشنهاد میکنم عضوش بشید🥰.
❤5
Signed Melanee
🎙 توی اپیزود پنجم Hoax Cast رفتیم سراغ یکی از دیوونهکننده ترین موضوعات مرز علم و فلسفه! آپلود مغز و جاودانگی دیجیتال یا (Mind Uploading)🔥 توی این اپیزود درباره این موضوعات صحبت کردیم: 📌 چطوری میشه ۸۶ میلیارد نورون مغز رو به صفر و یک تبدیل کرد؟ 📌 داستان واقعی رباتِ لگویی که مغز یک کرم رو روش نصب کردن! 📌 پارادوکس هولناک هویت: آیا نسخه کپیشده واقعاً «خودِ شماست» یا فقط یک هوش مصنوعی کپیکاره؟ 📌 آینده دنیایی که آدم…
❤6
Signed Melanee
#معرفی سریال انیشتین اگر مثل من عاشق فیلم های بیوگرافی علمی هستید؛ تو روبیکا یک سریالی هست به اسم "نابغه" که فصل اولش راجب زندگی آلبرت انیشتین هست. این سریال بسیار جذاب هست و به خوبی و با جزییات زندگی انیشتین رو نشون میده.
❤4👍3
Signed Melanee
یک وبلاگ کوچولو هم راه اندازی کردم؛ کم کم کاملش میکنم🤗: (میدونم یکم نوستالژیه) https://science-academy.blogfa.com/
❤7👏1
Signed Melanee
امشب اگر یک ستارهی درخشان نزدیک ماه دیدید، اون سیاره مریخه!😎 (حدود ساعت ۱ شب مقارنهی ماه و مریخ)
❤8😍3👍1
Signed Melanee
اسم کانالم از Melanee AI & Physics به "آکادمی علوم شقایق رحمانی" تغییر پیدا کرد🤗.
❤12
Signed Melanee
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @science_academy_rahmani. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“آکادمی علوم شقایق رحمانی” (@science_academy_rahmani), 798 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/science_academy_rahmani.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.