Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for The School of Letters

Channel

The School of Letters

@schoolofletters

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

737subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001882091278
TypeChannel
Username@schoolofletters
Created19 January 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held7
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/schoolofletters

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

728737732.57 August 2026 — 732 subscribers7 August 2026 — 732 subscribers15 August 2026 — 730 subscribers22 August 2026 — 728 subscribers29 August 2026 — 730 subscribers8 September 2026 — 734 subscribers15 September 2026 — 737 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
7 measurements spanning 39 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 727–738 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 00:01737+3
8 Sept 2026, 03:36734+4
29 Aug 2026, 13:15730+2
22 Aug 2026, 23:45728-2
15 Aug 2026, 20:17730-2
7 Aug 2026, 12:12732no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:46732first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

340 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤15244.7%
custom 52738351478572395395014.7%
💔4713.8%
❤‍🔥216.18%
🔥195.59%
custom 5323327026671657084113.24%
🙏82.35%
💘72.06%
🥰72.06%
😇51.47%
custom 540254007487942678741.18%
⚡20.588%
🕊20.588%
😢20.588%
custom 521571527245064501010.294%
✍10.294%
👍10.294%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 340 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 20 we hold a reading for · 15%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @schoolofletters. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 15:20 UTC56 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @wavespoetry

«ВОЛНЫ»: АНОНС «Волны» — проект, ориентированный на работу с разными интонациями и формами поэтического письма на русском языке. Мы стремимся формировать многомерное пространство, в котором предпочтение отдаётся дебютантам, но при этом представлен широкий спектр независимой поэзии. В редколлегию «Волн» входят поэты, редакторы и издатели, систематически работающие с современной русскоязычной литературой. Первый соста…

❤6❤‍🔥4🔥3

5 Aug 2026, 06:42 UTC169 views26 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Голос, отраженный цветами, — за спиной воздушная ноша. Рождается — стоит тебе отвернуться. Насколько эхо непроходимо? Хрупкий невидимый зверь, уснувший около уха — во сне что-то цветет по контуру угасающей речи. #письмо

❤13custom 52738351478572395396💔2custom 53233270266716570842custom 54025400748794267872👍1

4 Aug 2026, 14:38 UTC127 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

🌟 Там, где не бывают солнце и луна, — Какой великолепный вид! (Дзенрин кусю, 80) На фото — Sou Fujimoto's 2013 Serpentine Pavilion, London (источник тут) #запись

custom 52738351478572395396💔4❤2custom 53233270266716570841

4 Aug 2026, 08:17 UTC132 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Так люблю эту картину У Гуаньчжуна за то, что тут отражаются только пустоты и дерево. Равновесность неба и дома, простого, как пространство. При такой интенсивности отношений между тем, что открыто, и тем, что сбывается внутри себя, происходит зарождение двух ласточек в небе. Знаки несобытия. #искусство

❤7custom 52738351478572395395💔4

2 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC145 views13 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @metajournal

В этом стихотворении нас находит взгляд коленчатого растения, уходящего под воду и замыкающего на себе прошлое, предшествующее человеческой истории, и неопределенный хронос постмира. Неповоротливое тело жизни ворочается и жмется к себе, когда край ее случайно касается другого края. То, что было-будет временем, вычитывается из свойств материи на ощупь, в слепой невозможности истратить допотопное наслаждение. Волны ид…

❤4custom 52738351478572395394💔2custom 54025400748794267872custom 53233270266716570841

2 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC133 viewsread 7 August 2026

Написала об одном из любимых поэтов 🧘‍♀️

2 Aug 2026, 06:21 UTC109 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @metajournal

Сергей Луговик * вот и все, может быть, угрюмый океан над моим зеленым коленчатым телом навис, как второе небо, — о, гиблое, или красные пятна вулканов растут, как еще не взошедшие покрытосеменных красивые и ненужные манкие органы парности наша гордая жизнь на болотах прежде-цена, где, как могли, коренились палео-мы наши хрупкие панцири — прихотливые, как нежные храмы Равенны, наше еще не совсем цветение, трубча…

custom 52738351478572395395❤3🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC176 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Есть особенный тип снов, которые я начинаю видеть раз в несколько лет. Обычно это связано со встречами, которые меняют линию горизонта. Это сны в пустом пространстве, где есть только идея самого пространства, и в нем — фраза, мысль, сверхкраткий разговор собеседников (если они являются). С каждой такой фразой я живу какое-то время, она становится моей виртуальной одеждой. Иногда они обретают вечный покой в стихах, ин…

❤15custom 527383514785723953910❤‍🔥5

31 Jul 2026, 16:14 UTC141 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @licenza_poetica

Сегодня в «Ленте» — представление книги Сергея Хана «Кабинет Глаз[Ова]» (UGAR.kz, 2026), тексты которой, с одной стороны, наследуют американской языковой поэзии, с другой, чувственно осмысляют окружающую (подчас грезящуюся) действительность. Публикация сопровождается отзывами Александра Уланова, Насти Головановой, Наталии Алексеевой, Евгении Либерман, Евгении Сусловой и Валерия Горюнова. — В стихах Сергея Хана — д…

❤12

30 Jul 2026, 16:25 UTC193 views20 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Комнатка для поэтической медитации. #ковер

❤‍🔥7🔥6❤5⚡2

30 Jul 2026, 10:13 UTC210 views21 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Если гора распалась на камни, каждый из которых соприроден друг другу, как собрать гору обратно? Превращает ли ветер камни в призрак горы? Небо умеет вмещать, и окаменевшие имена учат новое имя становиться горой камней. Шрифт-фантом с опытом обретает тяжесть, придавая вес земляному костюму. Глаза украшают воздух, создавая полости для событий. Ночь находит на день, образуя пустое множество. #письмо

❤12💔5custom 52738351478572395392custom 53233270266716570842

28 Jul 2026, 09:50 UTC257 views53 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня говорили с сестрой об особом чувстве, которое, мелькая, преображает всё. Это чувство, которое я называю чувством своей реальности. Никогда не успеваю отследить, почему оно вспыхивает. Но сегодня я сидела среди горы вещей (последствия переезда) и вдруг так ясно его ощутила. Первый раз оно пришло ко мне в 29. Хорошо помню этот момент — мне тогда показалось, что от меня отвалилась бетонная многоэтажка! Осколки с…

❤31💔9🙏7custom 52738351478572395394🕊2

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @schoolofletters. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

25 Jul 2026, 15:44 UTCAnonymous Poll58 voters

Что вам хотелось бы издать?

  1. Книгу28%
  2. Звук29%
  3. Закон16%
  4. Себя12%
  5. Своего друга9%
  6. Своего возлюбленного / возлюбленную14%
  7. Новое солнце12%
  8. Забвение10%
  9. Детей7%
  10. Иное16%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“The School of Letters” (@schoolofletters), 737 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/schoolofletters.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.