3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,170–3,176 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 04:58
3,171
-4
7 Aug 2026, 08:33
3,175
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:37
3,175
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.0%
avg views ÷ 3,171 subscribers
Avg views / post
602
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.10%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 July 2026
Posts held
18 (1 December 2025 – 28 July 2026)
Views total
1,807
Reactions total
56
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 23:44 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 59s
Average length
7m 59s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
301 reactions across 18 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
159
52.8%
🔥
75
24.9%
👍
53
17.6%
👏
7
2.33%
👎
3
0.997%
🤔
3
0.997%
😱
1
0.332%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 18 we hold a reading for · 17%
Most on one post
4
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @school_matchast. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 December 2025 to 28 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сегодня у меня случился для вас подарок - но не для всех, а для родителей подростков.
Которые заботятся о своих детях и очень хотят помочь им собрать свой индивидуальный маршрут развития (в который и учеба "по любви", и определение с профессией входят как части).
Так что, если вы не этот самый родитель, но у вас есть такие знакомые, передайте подарок дальше - уверена, будет польза =)
Подарок родился, естественно, в п…
Наглядно о том, что такое образовательный маршрут, или образовательная траектория. То, что я помогаю выстроить на индивидуальных консультациях. Плюс - семейная ситуация.
ВСЁ, ЧТО ЛИШАЕТ ЧЕЛОВЕКА СВОБОДЫ ЗАМЫСЛА И ПЕРЕЖИВАНИЯ, УГНЕТАЕТ ЕГО
Современные образовательные программы – даже самые передовые и персонализированные – все чаще обнаруживают в себе скрытые механизмы угнетения личности учащегося. Это угнетение нелегко изобличить, вот почему сегодня я делюсь с вами материалом, который призван помочь задуматься: до какой степени то образование, которое мы считаем хорошим, срыто угнет…
ТО, ЧТО НЕ ИЗМЕНИТСЯ НИКОГДА
Необходимое дополнение к предыдущей публикации, а также домашняя работа для любого родителя и педагога. Великолепная Екатерина Лапшина беседует с человековедом Александром Асмоловым - и он делится большим знанием о нашей природе, настоящем и будущем человечества. Перед тем, как приходить на консультацию по выбору образовательной траектории, настоятельно рекомендую вам посмотреть это инте…
ТО, БЕЗ ЧЕГО НИКАК
Ваш ребенок уже использует ИИ? Нет, давайте уж по-честному: уберем знак вопроса. Ваш ребенок уже использует ИИ.
Что же с этим делать?
Помните, в детстве нас учили не пользоваться калькулятором, а считать в уме? А потом калькулятор оказался не важен, и вы со временем поняли, что важным всегда было как считать и зачем. С ИИ то же самое — только сложнее.
ИИ — это не про будущее, а про сейчас.
И в…
ЛЕТНИЙ ИНТЕНСИВ ПО ЭССЕ НА АНГЛИЙСКОМ ДЛЯ ПОДРОСТКОВ
Летнему интенсиву по эссе для подростков быть - он пройдет на платформе Teen Uni!
Это всего 10 занятий - и все: ваш ребенок сможет создать сильный текст на английском.
Как устроен курс
Студенты учатся понимать задание, правильно читая и разбирая его формулировку. Далее они знакомятся с основными законами риторики и логики, после чего практикуются в написании раз…
КУРС «ОСНОВЫ ПОЗНАНИЯ»
(на английском языке)
Было очень много запросов на этот курс, и я решил провести его в блиц-формате, чтобы успеть завершить до начала летних каникул, до июля.
На этом курсе мы изучаем собственно знание. Подростки знакомятся с его природой, а также тем, как оно понимается и достигается в совершенно разных дисциплинах: от искусства до современных технологий. Например, мы изучим разницу между ис…
📣 Как работает современная школа? 🖍️🖍️🖍️🖍️
Этой весной Европейская гимназия проводит первый открытый семинар
«Как работает современная школа: практики и обмен опытом»
😎 Европейская гимназия — частная школа с более чем 30-летней историей (основана в 1992 году).
Мы сами постоянно учимся, обмениваемся опытом с коллегами и видим, как не хватает открытого профессионального разговора об образовательных подходах, актуаль…
СТИПЕНДИИ ДЛЯ ШКОЛЬНИКОВ ИЗ СТРАН СНГ И БАЛТИИ
С удовольствием размещаю анонс о продлении очень крутой стипендиальной программы для детей, одаренных в STEM. Тем более, что первый поток юных гениев я уже учу писать по-английски.
🚀80 стипендий на обучение в школе The Island на Кипре и H-FARM International School в Италии для детей, талантливых в математике, физике и программировании!
The Island School и H-FARM Inter…
АВТОРСКИЙ КУРС ENGLISH WRITING ОТ ВАСИЛИЯ ГОРБАЧЕВА ДЛЯ ПОДРОСТКОВ
Спрашивали, как позаниматься со мной недорого - отвечаю.
Завтра на платформе Лицей Онлайн стартует мой курс для подростков English Writing.
Это -- курс-салат по академическому и творческому письму на английском языке. Мы начинаем с уровня предложения, осваиваем основы английского синтаксиса и пунктуации, создаем на (электронной) бумаге творческую и…
❤11🔥6👍4
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @school_matchast. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 326,393 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Школа. Матчасть” (@school_matchast), 3,171 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/school_matchast.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
