Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ScholarConnect

Channel

ScholarConnect

@scholarconnectuz

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry

1,004subscribers

-24 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002553431869
TypeChannel
Username@scholarconnectuz
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scholarconnectuz

Growth

1,0041,0281,0167 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,027 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,019 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,015 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,012 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,008 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,004 subscribers7 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -24. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,000–1,032 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 18:471,004-4
24 Aug 2026, 12:371,008-4
20 Aug 2026, 23:161,012-3
18 Aug 2026, 07:321,015-4
14 Aug 2026, 21:171,019-7
11 Aug 2026, 07:341,026-1
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,027no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:401,027-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:301,028first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

250 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
11044.0%
custom 54653881423432560496024.0%
🔥5823.2%
👏104.00%
😍52.00%
🤷‍♀41.60%
🤯20.8%
🤷10.4%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 250reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 May 2026 to 30 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 15:10 UTC548 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Last call. We close in a couple of hours, and the next group won't be at this price. If you want in, message us now and we'll get you set up. Message @scholarconnect_uz now to get your spot

custom 546538814234325604972🔥1

30 Jun 2026, 08:45 UTC636 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026

A few hours left before we close. Quick recap. Standard, $49: all 8 mentor sessions, the cold-email system, the full paper guide. Premium, $99: all of that plus one-on-one time with Sardor and Abrorbek and our academic writer on your own draft. Money back either way if it doesn't work for you. Mesage here @scholarconnect_uz

custom 546538814234325604963🤯2

30 Jun 2026, 04:41 UTC≈1,830 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Last day. We close tonight, and we won't bring it up again after this. If you keep planning to get serious about research "later," later has a habit of becoming the week before applications are due, when it's too late to start anything real. The students who'll walk into application season with a finished paper and a researcher behind them are the ones deciding today. Message @scholarconnect_uz research to secure y

8

29 Jun 2026, 09:03 UTC599 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Same questions keep coming in, so let's clear them up. How much time does this take? A few hours a week. Everything is recorded, so you fit it around school. What's the real difference between the plans? With Standard you learn everything and do it yourself. With Premium you also get hours of one-on-one time with our mentors and an academic writer who reads your actual draft and helps you fix it. Pick Premium if yo

5

28 Jun 2026, 11:58 UTC≈2,290 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🗣️ We’ll let these do the talking today. 📸 Four of our students. Four real replies from researchers at serious universities, writing back to high schoolers. One of them offered a call. Another said she’d help the student develop her own research idea. A third asked to keep the conversation going on Telegram. 💭 If the thing holding you back is “who am I to email a professor,” read those again. Every one of these stu

custom 546538814234325604972👏2

28 Jun 2026, 09:18 UTC569 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🚀 Enrollment is open. Here's the whole thing, straight. It's called The Research Launchpad. By the end you'll have a finished research paper and at least one researcher at a real university who knows your name. That second part is what makes an admissions officer actually stop on your application instead of skimming past it. 🎯 Two ways in. 📦 Standard, $49. All 8 recorded sessions with the mentors, the cold-email s

7custom 54653881423432560495🤷‍♀4👏2🤷1

27 Jun 2026, 11:59 UTC532 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

👋 Before we open enrollment tomorrow, you should know who's actually teaching this. We're not putting random tutors in front of you. 🎓 Kerim Kochekov did his PhD at HKUST and research at Oxford, and he coaches a national informatics team. He takes on the part most students get wrong, which is picking a research question that's actually worth spending months on. 📝 Dr. Stephanie Jolliff is a school superintendent in

12👏3custom 54653881423432560491

26 Jun 2026, 06:02 UTC563 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Here's the first lesson we promised. If you've ever emailed a professor and heard nothing back, your subject line was probably the reason. Professors get a stack of emails every week that say things like "Request for research opportunity," and most get deleted without ever being opened. The students we work with do the opposite. They write something specific about the professor's own work, like "A question about y

12custom 54653881423432560496🔥1

25 Jun 2026, 18:28 UTC583 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

We disappeared from this channel for about a month. Here's what we were actually doing. We were sitting with a handful of students while they emailed researchers at universities like Oxford and Stanford — and helping them get replies. Real ones. One professor offered a call. Another offered to help a student build out their own research idea from scratch. These aren't geniuses with connections. They're students fro

12custom 546538814234325604910

26 May 2026, 16:00 UTC≈1,020 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

12🔥6custom 54653881423432560493

25 May 2026, 17:58 UTCviews —

ScholarConnect pinned «Share this as much as you can with your peers, so that they can also have an idea of how to write coldmail.»

25 May 2026, 17:58 UTC≈1,030 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Share this as much as you can with your peers, so that they can also have an idea of how to write coldmail.

11👏2custom 54653881423432560492

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @scholarconnectuz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ScholarConnect” (@scholarconnectuz), 1,004 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scholarconnectuz.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.