Channel
@schmellv1s
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
100subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002593225036 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @schmellv1s |
| Description | @frisbeedoggg |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/schmellv1s |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:45 | 100 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 100 | first reading |
12 posts held, back to 30 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
429 reactions across 12 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5445330748150129505 | 106 | 24.7% | |
| custom 5983172816680262280 | 66 | 15.4% | |
| custom 6046526921485851303 | 65 | 15.2% | |
| custom 5409148358805696702 | 63 | 14.7% | |
| custom 5373041530820918910 | 58 | 13.5% | |
| custom 5235943301399468420 | 38 | 8.86% | |
| 😴 | 12 | 2.80% | |
| 🔥 | 8 | 1.86% | |
| 🕊 | 8 | 1.86% | |
| 👻 | 5 | 1.17% |
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 429reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 30 March 2026 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
хоть моя аудитория не такая уж и большая, зато все пиплс имеют +1000 аура. Спасибо тем, кто, не смотря на редкий актив с моей стороны, продолжают следить, реактить и комментировать. 🤩
custom 544533074815012950519custom 52359433013994684208custom 59831728166802622807🔥1
сова (не) на скакалке 😅✌️ в коммах файлом @schmellv1s
custom 544533074815012950530custom 523594330139946842018custom 598317281668026228012🔥2
в коммах файлом
custom 598317281668026228021custom 544533074815012950516🕊8custom 52359433013994684203🔥1
comissionnnn @schmellv1s
custom 544533074815012950517custom 598317281668026228011👻5🔥2custom 52359433013994684201
хедскетч для плесени @schmellv1s
custom 544533074815012950522custom 598317281668026228013custom 52359433013994684207🔥2
сориками через нолик @schmellv1s
custom 604652692148585130320custom 540914835880569670214custom 537304153082091891011
подпищеки, обещанный щит-пост! рассказывайте, как у вас дела? приношу фото с колляжной жизни. И НЕБОЛЬШОЙ СПОЙЛЕР К БУДУЩЕМУ АРТУ :)э #shitpost @schmellvis
custom 537304153082091891013😴9custom 60465269214858513035custom 59831728166802622801
как вам нравится больше - небольшой щит-пост, или чисто арты раз в месяц-полтора?
custom 54091483588056967028custom 54453307481501295051custom 59831728166802622801
artist vs arts duh
custom 537304153082091891017custom 540914835880569670210custom 60465269214858513036😴3
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 540914835880569670215custom 52359433013994684201custom 54453307481501295051
СМОТРИТЕ КАКОЙ СМАК МНЕ НАРИСОВАЛА ВЕЛИКАЯ ЛЕРА ШЛЭЭЭЛЬ теперь я опоссум
custom 604652692148585130322custom 537304153082091891017custom 540914835880569670216
откуда плодятся подписчики
custom 604652692148585130312
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @schmellv1s. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 642,080 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ɯʍæᴧьььь” (@schmellv1s), 100 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/schmellv1s.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.