Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Исполняем сценарий света

Channel

Исполняем сценарий света

@scenariysveta

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

333subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002153585798
TypeChannel
Username@scenariysveta
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scenariysveta

Growth

333334333.56 August 2026 — 334 subscribers6 August 2026 — 334 subscribers14 August 2026 — 333 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 333–334 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 15:14333-1
6 Aug 2026, 21:46334no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:50334first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
no view readings in window
Avg views / post
no view readings
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 19 July 2026
Posts held20 (6 May 202619 July 2026)
Views total
Reactions total3
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 21:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

44 reactions across 10 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1943.2%
1329.5%
💯715.9%
🔥24.55%
❤‍🔥12.27%
💊12.27%
😁12.27%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 44reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 19 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC186 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Продолжим. Начало здесь. Круговая Ответственность (принцип описан в Круговой Поруке) предлагает принципиально иной путь: субъект имеет право на сбор ресурса, но лишь в том объёме, который не вызывает каскадного дефицита у других участников экосистемы. Синергетический подход к управлению ресурсами в альтернативных моделях Проектируя новые социально-экономические модели взаимодействия, критически важно уходить от пе

2

30 Jun 2026, 11:38 UTC140 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

Дело Гэри Харрингтона сквозь призму Социальной синергии В массовом медийном пространстве дело Гэри Харрингтона часто преподносится как абсурдный триумф государственной бюрократии над здравым смыслом: «Человека отправили в тюрьму на 30 дней за сбор дождевой воды на собственном участке!». Подобные заголовки создают ложный контекст, апеллирующий к базовому чувству справедливости и защите частной собственности. Они рис

28 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC145 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

От человекообразного существа к Человеку — убрать «деньги» ​При капитализме наивысшая ценность — это капитал. Когда для человека именно капитал становится главным ориентиром, он превращается в человекообразное существо. ​Механика расчеловечивания проста: вместо заботы о реальной жизни (еде, крове, одежде и развитии), приоритетом становится бесконечная погоня за деньгами. Но с денег всё только начинается. Финал эт

👍2

18 Jun 2026, 07:30 UTC410 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🔥 Мы отправили Павла Дурова на форум... Взгляд на «Титаник» цифрового ГУЛАГа сверху Павел Дуров на Oslo Freedom Forum бьёт в набат: наш корабль свобод налетел на айсберг, мы тонем, шлюпок нет, бежать некуда. Паша описывает тотальную слежку, биометрию и «чат-контроль» ростовщиков, путая понятия и называя этот грядущий загон «антиутопией». Но Паша заблуждается в главном: это будущее уже наступило, — «Титаник» прямо

👍2

11 Jun 2026, 09:25 UTC199 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Управление представляет собой право или обязанность? Как общество было превращено в ресурс для эксплуатации? В детстве каждый ребёнок играл в песочнице. Представьте ситуацию, когда в песочницу входит посторонний человек, забирает все игрушки, возводит из них ограждение и заявляет: «Теперь это моя личная крепость, а вы будете играть только по моим правилам и передавать мне свои конфеты». Аналогичным образом устроена

1👍1

2 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «Вообще, все, почему-то, делая некую логическую ошибку, полагают, что эти технологии отменяют или подменяют все остальное. Я специально выделил в статье, что они не заменяют реальный мир, а дают возможность в этом реальном мире, на более высоком уровне, организовать…»

2 Jun 2026, 19:11 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «Что по аналогии с пирамидальными (централизованными структурами) можно считать аналогами министерств и ведомств. Очевидно, что следующий за этим организационный уровень, работающий уже с «социальной тканью» и его мотиваторы, это государственный уровень, поскольку…»

2 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «В описании «социальной синергии» чётко сформулирован принцип: каждый участник и их объединения («виртуальные корпорации») не перераспределяют (тем более страховые взносы), а производят. Начиная от работ и услуг, отдельными участниками и до продуктов питания…»

2 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «Вопрос первый. Откуда берется столь значительный дисконт в цене? Снижение цены на конечный продукт (до 40-60%) складывается из дисконтов на каждом звене этого цикла. Действительно, если покупатель(пенсионер) придет на оптовый рынок, то он купит продукт,…»

2 Jun 2026, 19:10 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «Вопрос-ответ по первой части антикризисного курса. (отсюда и ниже - 5 публикаций, без сокращений) Поскольку в связи с изложенным в антикризисном курсе возникают однотипные вопросы, такие как: «Нанять исполнителей для асфальтирования улицы: для этого надо…»

2 Jun 2026, 19:09 UTCviews —

Исполняем сценарий света pinned «Антикризисный курс. ..продолжение Первой части. И ещё, часто мы делаем не то, что лучше всего умеем, или желаем, а то, за что платят. Так вот, в этой системе, пусть вы и автослесарь... , но умеете что-то другое, тогда, при желании, можете даже тамадой подработать…»

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scenariysveta. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 35,697 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Исполняем сценарий света” (@scenariysveta), 333 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scenariysveta.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.