Channel
@scavmmer
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002297727804 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scavmmer |
| Created | Between 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scavmmer |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:48 | 5 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 5 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4 reactions across 4 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 50.0% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 25.0% | |
| 😈 | 1 | 25.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 April 2026 to 3 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
izin klarifikasi ya. akun yang lagi pakai testimoni aku itu bukan admin, partner, atau ada hubungan apa pun sama aku. kita bahkan belum pernah transaksi, dan testimoni itu dipakai tanpa izin. pas aku coba cari jejak akunnya, ternyata ada beberapa laporan yang mengaitkan akun tersebut dengan dugaan penipuan [ t.me/pantaupenipu/10204 ]. aku gak bisa memastikan itu benar atau enggak, tapi tetap hati-hati dan jangan lang…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
halo, aku mau klarifikasi soal laporan penipuan [t.me/bantaipenip/29788]. setelah aku cek, ternyata ada pihak yang bikin akun clone dan pakai identitasku. aku tegasin kalau akun tersebut bukan punyaku dan aku sama sekali nggak ada hubungan atau kerja sama dengan pelaku. segala tindakan yang dilakukan akun itu di luar tanggung jawab aku. mohon pastiin lagi username, kontak, atau identitas akun sebelum lanjut transaksi…
Photo, posted without a caption
penipuan baru : 1. 901091483580 (modus tagihan jago) 2. 085133257219 Shopepay / no name (modus tagihan ovo)
chnya ganti https://t.me/muIaii http://miilot.t.me @jeIitsa
❤1
update-an tentang si gabriel bisa dicek di https://t.me/icuIunpenipu
udah lama ga update ya disini, aku mau bawa kabar baik & kabar buruk. kabar baiknya, nomorku akhirnya di delete dari bio store ini, tapi aku ga tau apakah akan berjalan lama atau enggaa, yaa semoga ga akan terulang aja. dan kabar buruknya adalah.. aku udah usaha ganti nomor, tapi ternyata sekarang nomor aku dipakai sama store @puisaa › @ccaiing › @goidenm (buktinya ada di comsect bbc ini ya). kronologinya kurang le…
❤1
Channel name was changed to «@ofcbay [ 7606761827 ] @tokobay @wstoret penipu!»
Channel name was changed to «@puqat 8609699038 @tokokor @wstoret penipu!»
Channel name was changed to «@lcacing @tokobas @wstoret penipu!»
please, lebih teliti lagi yuk kalau milih seller. jangan cuma lihat harga murah terus langsung auto percaya. coba perhatiin bagian honest review (t.me/wstoret/57) comsect-nya masa harus di-apply dulu, kalau emang jujur harusnya bebas dong orang mau komen apa. terus liat juga jam-jam komentarnya, sekilas keliatan kayak “ramai banget” tapi kalau dipikir-pikir itu ga masuk akal. belum lagi akun-akun yang komen kebanyaka…
😈1
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @scavmmer. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,313,066 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@scavmmer named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“isinya klarifikasi.” (@scavmmer), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scavmmer.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.