Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Центр коммуникаций Союза Торговых Центров

@scaproPR

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

680subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001669664019
TypeChannel
Username@scaproPR
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scaproPR

Growth

679680679.57 August 2026 — 679 subscribers8 August 2026 — 679 subscribers14 August 2026 — 680 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 679–680 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 14:57680+1
8 Aug 2026, 02:32679no change
7 Aug 2026, 12:20679first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.2%
avg views ÷ 680 subscribers
Avg views / post
328
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 18 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held18 (4 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,967
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

4 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍4100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:39 UTC65 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Rentu анонсирует Rentu AI — первого ИИ-советника для управляющих торговыми центрами Rentu представляет ИИ-агента «Советник», который берёт на себя рутинную аналитику по выручке, трафику и арендаторам — вместо ручных сводов и таблиц . Продукт уже не концепт: он проверен на закрытой группе клиентов, и теперь команда открыто показывает, как это работает на вебинаре. Что умеет агент: ⚠️ Находит аномалии в выручке, траф

5 Aug 2026, 12:02 UTC372 viewsread 8 August 2026

Более 70% торговых центров в регионах России будут нуждаться в обновлении к 2027 году. Такое мнение выразил ТАСС управляющий директор Союза торговых центров Сергей Платицын. "Торговые центры по-прежнему востребованы, но только те, которые перестали быть коробками с арендаторами: по моей оценке, в реконцепции нуждается около 62% российских ТЦ, а в 2026-2027 годах эта доля может достичь 64-67%. В регионах показатель о

30 Jul 2026, 07:52 UTC146 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @blyumkinpro

Гильдия НСБ МТПП 04 августа 2026 года проводит круглый стол на тему «Актуализация комплексного подхода к защите ключевых объектов инфраструктуры московского региона от угроз совершения актов незаконного вмешательства с использованием беспилотных аппаратов (БПЛА)».Место проведения: Малый конференц-зал Союза «Московская торгово-промышленная палата» (г. Москва, ул. Петровка, д. 15, стр. 1). Время: 14:00-17:00 (13:30 – н

22 Jul 2026, 16:04 UTC936 viewsread 8 August 2026

Уже завтра 23 июля пройдет КОНФЕРЕНЦИЯ БЕЗОПАСНОСТЬ РИТЕЙЛА Ежегодная встреча «Ассоциации экспертов безопасности ритейла», традиционно приуроченная ко Дню работников торговли в экспертной дискуссии "Стратегия безопасности торговой площади: минимизация рисков и рост операционной эффективности" примет участие Павел Люлин, Вице-президент Союза торговых центров ,доктор экономических наук

18 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC226 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @blyumkinpro

Маркетплейс не может и не должен компенсировать селлерам стоимость уничтоженных по форс-мажору товаров ! Фин модель не позволяет , да и не честно это . Маркетплейс просто не в состоянии исполнить финансовые обязательство по возмещению денег за не проданный товар . В торговом центре ритейл сам страхует свои товарные запасы. Вот и здесь сам селлер может и должен сам страховать свои запасы на складе маркеплейса и уже

10 Jul 2026, 12:49 UTC236 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @blyumkinpro

разгребаем итоги июня и вот пишут обо мне и рядом очень уважаемые люди в одном посте у одного из блогеров-риэлторов - Анны Ермаковой , кстати более 12 тысяч подписчиков . мое выступление и ответы про смерть торговых центров зашло на ура Главное мероприятие для девелоперов недвижимости - это форум ДВИЖЕНИЕ в Сочи (и конечно форум в форуме - Форум по коммерческой недвижимости на Движении! ) Главное мероприятие

9 Jul 2026, 10:20 UTC355 viewsread 8 August 2026

Напоминаю, что в настоящее время мы к Булату Шакирову никакого отношения не имеем. Подробнее уже писал https://t.me/scaproPR/1510

9 Jul 2026, 10:16 UTC204 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @andreykovalev_russiaPhoto

Булат Шакиров - профессиональный мошенник, аферист и инфоцыган. Представляется типа президентом типа Союза торговых центров России, Белоруссии и Казахстана, левой конторки. Сейчас идут его многочисленные банкротства. Он все еще продает квартиры и офисы на несуществующем острове в Черном море. Всем рассказывает какой он офигенный владелец торговых центров.. Перекидал огромное количество людей! Надеюсь закончит свою

7 Jul 2026, 08:15 UTC144 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @blyumkinpro

Каждый день много коммуникаций . Разговоры , переписки , встречи с теми , кто принимает решения . Отрасль коммерческой недвижимости живет , точнее как я говорил на форуме Движение в Сочи ВЫЖИВАЕТ . а для тех , у кого утро пессимизма, повторю ! СМЕРТИ НЕТ ! Знаете, мне очень не нравится выражение «умирают». Потому что, скажем так, смерти нет в принципе. Есть перерождение. Поэтому торговые центры изменяются, это нормал

2 Jul 2026, 08:55 UTC319 viewsread 8 August 2026

ТАСС опубликовал комментарий Сергея Платицына о будущем рынка торговой недвижимости. В интервью информационному агентству ТАСС руководитель MALLEXPERT и управляющий партнер Союза торговых центров Сергей Платицын рассказал о ключевых тенденциях рынка, трансформации торговых центров и перспективах развития коммерческой недвижимости. 📰 Читать материал ТАСС: https://tass.ru/nedvizhimost/27877349

2 Jul 2026, 07:10 UTC831 viewsread 8 August 2026

Главная новость июля ! У Союза Торговых Центров появилась новая группа для общения https://t.me/scaprogroup Все как было раньше теперь писать могу не только админы , а все участники ! Все как было раньше .

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @scaproPR. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Jun 2026, 09:33 UTCAnonymous Poll73 voters

Что завтра скажет глава государства на ПМЭФ про APLLE и МАКС ? могут ли запретить ввоз в РОССИИ продукции APPLE ?

  1. Да , могут запретить , ЛЕГКО !40%
  2. Нет , такое невозможно даже себе представить .33%
  3. Даже боюсь себе такое представить , просто покажите мне ответы .27%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,103,577 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Центр коммуникаций Союза Торговых Центров” (@scaproPR), 680 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scaproPR.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.