Channel
@scandefi
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
559subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001480839713 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scandefi |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scandefi |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:57 | 559 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:31 | 560 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:22 | 560 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 21 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
95 reactions across 9 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 30 | 31.6% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 26.3% | |
| 🔥 | 25 | 26.3% | |
| 💩 | 11 | 11.6% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 3.16% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.05% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 95reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2022 to 21 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🚨 PRECAUCIÓN 🚨 Recientemente, nos informaron sobre imitadores que crearon una réplica de nuestra plataforma [Scandefi.net]. Si reciben mensajes en nuestro nombre, les pedimos máxima cautela. Scan DeFi no tiene ninguna página oficial activa. No duden en reportar cualquier actividad fraudulenta relacionada con personas que se hagan pasar por nosotros. Recuerda unirte a Avatar si no lo estás, donde compartimos las ac…
💩11❤1👍1🥰1
🙌 Scan DeFi Official Statement 🌀 We ask you to read carefully in order to align ourselves with the upcoming changes in Scan DeFi and Tin DeFi. If you have any questions or doubts, you can contact our Tiners in the community of your choice. ▫️ Tin DeFi Spanish - https://t.me/tin_defi_grupo_espanol ▫️Ad Channel - https://t.me/TinDeFianuncios ▫️Tin DeFi English - https://t.me/tin_defi_english_group ▫️Announcement C…
👍5
🎙COMUNICADO OFICIAL 🎙 Buenos días querida comunidad, os escribe Álex. Ayer lamentablemente tuve que retirar la liquidez de Scan DeFi, y pude ocasionar un desconcierto durante algunas horas. Antes de nada quisiera llamar a la calma, ya que el movimiento lo hice personalmente yo desde una cuenta del equipo, y dispongo de los fondos para desarrollar el proyecto sin ningún tipo de problema. Podéis estar tranquilos de …
🔥24👎23👍6
🎙Última hora🎙 Soy Álex Miralles, que no cunda el pánico con Scan DeFi. Haré un ama en los próximos minutos explicando lo que estamos haciendo.
👍8👎7
Were you paying attention?🤓 These weeks we talk about satellite scams, social engineering, phishing, and other types of scams. 📑 We bring a Crypto dictionary for those who need a recap. Remember that the best thing we can do to prevent scams is to learn how they work and how to protect ourselves. Go to Scan's Blog 🌀 where you find articles about security, scams, and best practices in the crypto world. 🔗👉https://…
📢 TOMORROW 📢 New AMA Session with: Javier Rodriguez - CIO of Scan DeFi🌀 With all the updates, our Q&A section ▶️ AND A SPECIAL SURPRISE◀️ You´ll have to be there to find out. 📅Tomorrow - ⏰ Monday 20:30 - Spain. 📍 🔗 https://t.me/scandefigroup 🔔Follow Scan DeFi to keep updated. ◾️https://linktr.ee/ScanDefi
📉Scan Defi - Trading tips 📈 Don't limit yourself; diversify your sources and get as much information as possible so you can compare. You wouldn't invest everything in one place, would you? The same goes for information. Researching, comparing, and learning is the most important thing. 🔔Follow us for more trading tips. ◾️https://linktr.ee/ScanDefi
👍2
Blockchain Scams - Part II 👤 Today, we talk about Phishing.🎣 This is one of the most common scams, and we are all vulnerable until we learn how to prevent getting caught in them. Visit our blog to get all the info on this type of scam and, more importantly, how to prevent and avoid them. 🙃 Fake mirror websites 🌐 ADS and URLs 🔓 Security Certificates 🔗👉https://bit.ly/3QZ1Uzw The only way to avoid scams is to kn…
What is a DAO?🕸 DAO is short for Decentralized Autonomous Organization. It’s an organization represented by rules on a computer program. It’s transparent, controlled by the organization’s members, and is not influenced by a central government. Sounds good, right?😲 There are lots of points of view over this type of business organization method. Still, you cannot deny that being transparent, autonomous, decentraliz…
👍2❤1
Networking.🌐 Our message, values, and work need to be out there. That's why we put together a team of collaborators and influencers to get our partners as far as possible. It's time to boost our reach and yours with Tin DeFi, our main partner in this new phase. Join Tin DeFi; we already did. 😎 🔔Follow Scan DeFi on social media. ◾️https://linktr.ee/ScanDefi
👍1
Newsletter 44- 45 📄 SCAN's team is getting ready! ➡️ Launches & Internal events ➡️ New objectives ➡️ Departament task & team 🔗👉https://bit.ly/3nmiQTa 🔔Follow us on social media. ◾️https://linktr.ee/ScanDefi
The Scan Show 🔻 New episode on Youtube! 🔻🎥 You won't want to miss this episode; we have a special guest, Paulo Morocho: A doctor, lawyer, and crypto entrepreneur. 😎Hosted by: Juan Gasca - CCO of Scan DeFi 🔗 👉 https://youtu.be/FmrSbxvh-28 🔔Follow us on social media. ◾️https://linktr.ee/ScanDefi
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scandefi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@scandefi named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCAN DEFI (Official Channel)” (@scandefi), 559 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scandefi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.