Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Scammers

@scamwatchers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

35subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001164327047
TypeChannel
Username@scamwatchers
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 May 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scamwatchers

Growth

353635.57 August 2026 — 36 subscribers10 August 2026 — 36 subscribers15 August 2026 — 35 subscribers7 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 35–36 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 17:3735-1
10 Aug 2026, 22:1536no change
7 Aug 2026, 00:4036first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 31 May 2021the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 December 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Recent posts

6 Dec 2021, 06:57 UTC218 viewsread 10 August 2026

Passing this down to someone who wants to run it.

Signed Eli

7 Jun 2021, 04:13 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 10 August 2026

Plenty of you know about “KRJ”’s Exit scam, the information was provided via @Avoid.

Signed mad

7 Jun 2021, 04:13 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ @krjscam ❌ Avoid dealing with this scammer!

Signed mad

7 Jun 2021, 04:13 UTC≈1,250 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔗 Permanent link to 1379669783 👤 Name: Krj 🌐 Username: @Legitimate 🔢 Datacenter: 1

Signed mad

7 Jun 2021, 04:12 UTC≈1,280 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ User denies MM and clears chat after. ‼️ Deal With Caution

Signed mad

7 Jun 2021, 04:12 UTC≈1,270 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔗 Permanent link to 1745169488 👤 Name: EliasCube 🌐 Username: @EliasCube 🔢 Datacenter: 1

Signed mad

7 Jun 2021, 04:11 UTC≈1,360 viewsread 10 August 2026

Sorry got caught up in campaigns and forgot I owned this. I’ll get admins in here to help soon, non bias ones of course 😘

Signed mad

2 Jun 2021, 23:29 UTC≈2,230 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ Impersonator of @fancy ‼️ Avoid dealing with this scammer!

Signed mad

2 Jun 2021, 23:29 UTC≈2,170 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔗 Permanent link to 1226063785 👤 Name: Jacob 🌐 Username: @JacobsHOT 🔢 Datacenter: 4

Signed mad

2 Jun 2021, 23:28 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ Scams Telegram usernames. ‼️ Avoid dealing with this scammer!

Signed mad

2 Jun 2021, 23:28 UTC≈2,060 viewsread 10 August 2026

🔗 Permanent link to 735643818 👤 Name: M 🥊 🌐 Username: @Snello 🔢 Datacenter: 4

Signed mad

2 Jun 2021, 20:46 UTC≈3,250 viewsread 10 August 2026

⚠️ Scammed $2k for IG growth. ‼️ Avoid dealing with this scammer!

Signed mad

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scamwatchers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Scammers” (@scamwatchers), 35 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scamwatchers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.