Channel
@scampoliceworld
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
36subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001206455919 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scampoliceworld |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scampoliceworld |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:31 | 36 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 36 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 30 January 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 5 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The channel will remain accessible for all users.
SCAMPOLICEWORLD pinned «From now on we will also provide a list of certified people that will never scam you and that I personally vouch. They are not selective scammers they are fully legit and vouched by me. You can trust these people 100% and if they scam you I can payout for…»
From now on we will also provide a list of certified people that will never scam you and that I personally vouch. They are not selective scammers they are fully legit and vouched by me. You can trust these people 100% and if they scam you I can payout for that. The list will be updated every 2 days and It will be in the format: Telegram username with link to their channel | Snapchat username If you feel like you shou…
Scammer ID: @LargeBalaPA 🔗 Their group/channel: https://t.me/LbalaWorks What was he selling/doing? Here we are with another stainer. He is not a middle but a loader, a loader that doesn’t pay the % to some mids and holders. Everything was going smooth as he managed to cash 10 out of the bk x gemini. He bumped @KingImpreza by telling him that he was going to send his side in the morning. The victim didn’t realise h…
Username History 👤 2090720148 1. 09/12/2021 00:34:10 @ghostchops
Name History 👤 2090720148 1. 09/12/2021 00:34:10 x
Scammer ID: @ghostchops 🔗 2090720148 Their group/channel: https://t.me/chopv1 What was he selling/doing? This is another case of fake loader. He is not just a mid but he is also bumping people. He bumped @riconew2 by telling him that he was just warming the drop with 600£. It wasn’t warm up money because he loaded £600 and told the middle(victim) for 2 days it was warm up money, “he kept saying he had 10k ready then…
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @scampoliceworld. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@scampoliceworld named 14 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SCAMPOLICEWORLD” (@scampoliceworld), 36 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scampoliceworld.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.