Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Скам-база від VERTUU | scam base

Channel

Скам-база від VERTUU | scam base

@scammers_spawn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

665subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002652057435
TypeChannel
Username@scammers_spawn
CreatedBetween 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live30 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 30 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/scammers_spawn

Growth

665670667.57 August 2026 — 669 subscribers7 August 2026 — 670 subscribers8 August 2026 — 670 subscribers15 August 2026 — 667 subscribers30 August 2026 — 665 subscribers7 August 202630 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 23 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 664–671 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Aug 2026, 04:48665-2
15 Aug 2026, 11:46667-3
8 Aug 2026, 02:33670no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:28670+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:44669first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 24 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.0%
avg views ÷ 665 subscribers
Avg views / post
133
1 post measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held11 (24 June 20265 August 2026)
Views total133
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 02:33 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 21s
Average length
1m 47s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 18:24 UTC304 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

​🚨 FIRIBGARLIK REPORT / BAN SO'ROVI 🚨 ​Ushbu shaxs miqdordagi pulni olib, na hisobni beryapti, na pulni qaytaryapti. Mutlaqo firibgarlik yo'li bilan pulni yemoqchi. ​Guruh adminlaridan va barcha savdogarlardan ushbu shaxsni qora ro'yxatga (Black List) qo'shishni va guruhlardan butunlay bloklashni so'rayman. Bunday vijdonsiz odamlarga guruhda joy yo'q va ular bilan savdo qilish mutlaqo xavfli. ​Barcha isbotlar va skri

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN

9 Jul 2026, 05:59 UTC622 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

Scammer ‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️‼️ swindler - fraudster - thief - liar‼️ Do not deal with this person. He stole $265 from me and refuses to return the money. I previously reported him as a scammer. He told me to delete all messages and he would compensate me, but he didn't keep his promise. He's like a child. Do not deal with him until he returns the money.‼️ @Kkarn_PubgM @KARN_ACCOUNTSS @KM_Resseller @Solo_mini_reseller @KM_A

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN 2

7 Jul 2026, 17:06 UTC401 viewsread 8 August 2026

@FRYTIK_Pubgm скамит людей на деньги. Говорит что он гарант, все его каналы это накрутка, не ведитесь,подделывает скрины перевода денег, он с РУ. Говорит что Верту работает на него. После передачи данных аккаунта кидает вас в черный список .

Signed VERTUU | читайте біо

3 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC505 viewsread 8 August 2026

5355953047 кароч акк ресают после продажи

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN

30 Jun 2026, 18:25 UTC593 viewsread 8 August 2026
Video

@sexflin Скам купил вирты в игре человек заблокировал он известный как Лиманьский продает игровую валюту в Блек-Раше не советую человек скамит на сотку гривен

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN

24 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC553 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @scambaseotoyaPhoto

The post was made after I was scammed.

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN

24 Jun 2026, 08:00 UTC507 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @scambaseotoyaPhoto

Warning ⚠️ Scammers Scam 310$ He has 3 telegram account (He was my friend 3 years) @PierceMcGrath @rwr3r @ceo_m4 And @noahbirch , but he delete this username https://t.me/WallstreetStore https://t.me/YhThankYou

Signed VERTUU SA ADMIN

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @scammers_spawn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Скам-база від VERTUU | scam base” (@scammers_spawn), 665 subscribers as measured 30 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scammers_spawn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.