Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Расту газует на заводе

@scam_production

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

229subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002127666215
TypeChannel
Username@scam_production
DescriptionНицшевый скуф скулит
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 August 2026
Measurements held3
On Telegramt.me/scam_production

Growth

228229228.57 Aug 2026, 11:53 — 228 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 03:12 — 229 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 10:16 — 229 subscribers7 Aug 2026, 11:538 Aug 2026, 10:16
3 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 228–229 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Aug 2026, 10:16229no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:12229+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:53228first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 October 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
75.6%
avg views ÷ 229 subscribers
Avg views / post
173
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.38%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 29 July 2026
Posts held20 (11 October 202529 July 2026)
Views total1,385
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
272
Videos
38
Links
88

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 18 posts, in 25 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3822.2%
🤣2514.6%
🤡2414.0%
148.19%
custom 5238130663818797192127.02%
😁127.02%
💔84.68%
❤‍🔥42.34%
🌭42.34%
👎31.75%
💊31.75%
💋31.75%
💩31.75%
🔥31.75%
🏆21.17%
💯21.17%
😭21.17%
🤮21.17%
custom 523597509704234592910.585%
custom 524029503098323783110.585%
5 further kinds52.92%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 October 2025 to 29 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
7
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 19 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @scam_production. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 October 2025 to 29 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jul 2026, 15:08 UTC144 views11 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

слив очередной новой випки одиссея. оказывается бабки с рекламы скама и обкеш на новых токенах пойдут на серьезный памп нового токена под робингуд мету

👍8😁3

28 Jul 2026, 05:54 UTC161 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нормисы как всегда. Зимой 2024 у них должно было пойти ускорение рынка, альтпездон, трампыпик сделает всем довольство как в Саудовской Аравии, бтц 107к лонг и т.д. Сейчас апатия, алкоголизм, завод. Идиоты, берите на всё что есть спот. Запас хода вниз от силы 30%, вверх иксы. Время быть жадным и тупым. Под мою ответственность, если что, все потери компенсирую лично.

👍7🌭4😁1custom 52359750970423459291

27 Jul 2026, 18:31 UTC150 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

🎧 Нажми, чтобы найти песню

👎2👍1

26 Jul 2026, 10:57 UTC181 views6 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Слабые выбирают наркотики. Слабые и глупые выбирают антидепрессанты. Я (sigma) выбираю полчаса отходняка после ягодичного моста.

🤡3custom 52381306638187971922👍1

23 Jul 2026, 16:28 UTC185 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждый человек причина своих несчастий. Сначала я предал себя, когда не покрыл петусеевы сумки в скуфоподписчиков шария и паблика «топор» (ну да, сейчас этот биомусор будут делать сказочно богатыми, идиот). Потом прокуколдил 2024 не покупая лои, не залетая в темки. За свою лень и глупость я понес страшнейшую кару — стал заводчанином. Созданный по образу и подобию Божию, фактически являясь Творцом в миниатюре, я низв

👍8❤‍🔥3custom 52381306638187971923🤡21

22 Jul 2026, 16:39 UTC182 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Постов не было потому что админ словил депрессию экзистенциальный кризис. Ноябрьское обрушение рынка криптовалют оголило его нежное сердце и сокрушило осознанием не нищеты, а нищеты из-за упущенных возможностей. Окончательно сдохли темки-схемки, реализованные, дай бог, на одну пятую. Бычка закончилась. Потеряны очередные годы, очередные возможности. Так черно мне не было никогда. Я много плакал, кричал, выл, стонал

💔8🤡2👎1🕊1🤣1

18 Jul 2026, 13:21 UTC224 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

if only you knew how bad things really are

🍌1💋1🤡1

14 Jul 2026, 16:52 UTC312 views7 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Жизнь дала трещину

4😁2💋1

30 Jun 2026, 09:34 UTC404 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

👍1🤡1custom 52381306638187971921

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @scam_production. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Расту газует на заводе” (@scam_production), 229 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scam_production.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.