#pyramid AC
❤5

Channel
@scalerwaves
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001965880540 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @scalerwaves |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 16 May 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/scalerwaves |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 22:23 | 109 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:02 | 108 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 04:45 | 108 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 16 May 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 May 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 7 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 16 May 2023 to 31 May 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#pyramid AC
❤5
https://www.higgypop.com/news/scalar-waves/
https://www.scientificexploration.org/docs/15/jse_15_2_bruhn.pdf
Channel name was changed to «Scalar waves»
Channel photo updated
Inert matter can thus be altered in any manner desired, to any state desired, depending only on the developed equipment embodiments and state of the art. All levels of the matter treated are affected, including molecules and their binding forces, atoms, atomic nuclei, nucleons, and even the quarks inside the nucleons themselves. Any kind of fundamental particle known can be affected and altered. A major use foreseen …
A scalar potential carries "hidden variables" or "hidden information" [see Whittaker 2(a)] – i.e., infolded longitudinal EM wave information undetectable with conventional instruments adapted for detecting only traverse waves – in the precise frequency, phase angle, and magnitude (amplitude) composition of its constituent longitudinal EM wave parts. These properties of the constituent parts are sometimes called the i…
The present invention makes heavy use of principles of nonlinear optics as a means of creating and conditioning longitudinal EM waves. This field deals with "phase conjugation", a term for the time-reversal of an electromagnetic wave, as will be described with reference to Fig. 25A. Modern nonlinear optics started slowly after a Soviet scientific briefing to Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in 1972, as noted by…
Moreover, interaction with a single charged particle automatically converts any longitudinal EM wave into a time-polarized EM wave, and the interaction of any time-polarized EM wave with a single charged particle automatically converts the wave into a longitudinal EM wave in 3-space. In the vacuum, there are always charge fluctuations (virtual charged particles) present, from the viewpoint of quantum mechanics. The v…
The present invention also teaches several other processes for conditioning potentials. When the phase angles of two transverse EM waves of the same frequency and amplitude are 180 degrees out of phase, their transverse vector components sum to zero, transforming the two waves into an oscillating stress potential in 3-space, which is a longitudinal EM wave (accompanied always by its paired time-polarized EM wave). In…
The prevent invention also provides methods and apparatus to produce a quantum potential similar to Bohm's quantum potential [29]. However, unlike Bohm’s, the present invention’s quantum potential may be formed at will and deterministically structured (conditioned). Figs. 10-11 teach production of a quantum potential from input transverse EM waves using phase-conjugate mirrors or other nonlinear reflectors or scatter…
❤1
Moreover, this invention teaches additional processes for conditioning potentials. Fig. 10 shows how certain molecules in solution may be utilized for frequency ranges determined from their chemical resonance and anti-Stokes emission characteristics. Colloidal suspensions of active particles can also be utilized to partially perform the process, where the colloids are sized to a resonant frequency of the incident wav…
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @scalerwaves. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,268,810 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Scalar waves” (@scalerwaves), 109 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/scalerwaves.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.