Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘™๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘ .

Channel

๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘™๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘ .

@savsellers

On this record: Growth ยท Engagement ยท Reactions ยท Posts ยท Citations ยท Handles named that no longer answer ยท Cite this entry

99subscribers

+5 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register ยท movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003125437905
TypeChannel
Username@savsellers
Created20 October 2025 โ€” measured โ€” dated from the channelโ€™s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/savsellers

Growth

949996.58 August 2026 โ€” 94 subscribers8 August 2026 โ€” 95 subscribers9 August 2026 โ€” 95 subscribers16 August 2026 โ€” 97 subscribers23 August 2026 โ€” 99 subscribers8 August 202623 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 15 days, net +5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โ€œno change observedโ€, never โ€œinterpolatedโ€. The vertical axis spans 93โ€“100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 20:0499+2
16 Aug 2026, 21:1897+2
9 Aug 2026, 12:3295no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:3295+1
8 Aug 2026, 08:3494first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 20 October 2025 โ€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโ€™s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโ€™s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR ยท 30 days
79.8%
avg views รท 99 subscribers
Avg views / post
79.0
1 post measured
Reaction rate
7.59%
reactions รท views ยท ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 9 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) รท viewsโ€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramโ€™s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days ยท latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held9 (20 October 2025 โ€“ 8 August 2026)
Views total79
Reactions total6
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface โ€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 12:32 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than โ€œcorrectingโ€ the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form โ€” 8.12K, 3.7M โ€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded โ€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

21 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
โค942.9%
๐Ÿ’˜733.3%
๐ŸŽ‰419.0%
๐Ÿ˜14.76%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ€” ๐Ÿ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ€” 4.34K, 1.2M โ€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโ€™s own count on each post โ€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ€” those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โ€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ€.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 20 October 2025 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTCviews โ€”

๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘™๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘ . pinned ยซ๊’ฐ๊’ฐ๏น’๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๏น•๊’ฑ๊’ฑ {july 13 - aug. 13} ใƒฝ @azaleiakei โ€” 9pts ใƒฝ @harveyzone โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @isaiditskrysee โ€” ใƒฝ @anaalissee โ€” ใƒฝ @minmonamin โ€” ใƒฝ @premiess โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @Zariyuhhh โ€” ใƒฝ @sweetley4 โ€” ใƒฝ @yuixxa โ€” 3pts ใƒฝ @kiiya22 โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @lilbiyaya โ€”โ€ฆยป

4 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC79 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

๐Ÿคฉavsellerโ€˜s ๐Ÿคฉiveaway ! ๐Ÿ“ to join : โ€ข must be saviโ€˜s reseller. โ€ข must have at least 20 points. โ€ข joined streamsaviโ€˜s main channel. โ€ข dm your proof of joining the main channel. prizes : ๐Ÿฅน (1) โ‚ฑ150 gcash ๐Ÿฅน (2) โ‚ฑ50 gcash ๐Ÿฅน (1) netflix shared profile ๐Ÿฅน (3) 6m warr. canva lifetime ๐Ÿฅนvia wheel of names. ends on the last day of august. ๐Ÿฅนsee comments for entries. good luckie to all! please joinnnnnnn ๐Ÿงธ

๐Ÿ’˜5๐ŸŽ‰1

13 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC172 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

top resellers of the month ! top 1 โ€ข @cheolsgurl ๐Ÿค top 2 โ€ข @yuixxa ๐Ÿค top 3 โ€ข @Zariyuhhh ๐Ÿค dm me your gcash numbers! as for the other resellers, dm me to get your consolation prizes (free prem accs)

๐ŸŽ‰3๐Ÿ’˜2๐Ÿ˜1

20 Oct 2025, 10:16 UTCโ‰ˆ1,870 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

๐“œonthly ๐“˜ncentives โธโธ๏น— top 3 resellers with the highest points. tuff 1 โ€” prize : P100 gcash tuff 2 โ€” prize : P50 gcash tuff 3 โ€” prize : P25 gcash consolation prizes for other resellers : canva & yt invites

โค4

20 Oct 2025, 09:57 UTCโ‰ˆ2,160 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

๊’ฐ๊’ฐ๏น’๐—ผ๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ถ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๏น•๊’ฑ๊’ฑ {july 13 - aug. 13} ใƒฝ @azaleiakei โ€” 9pts ใƒฝ @harveyzone โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @isaiditskrysee โ€” ใƒฝ @anaalissee โ€” ใƒฝ @minmonamin โ€” ใƒฝ @premiess โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @Zariyuhhh โ€” ใƒฝ @sweetley4 โ€” ใƒฝ @yuixxa โ€” 3pts ใƒฝ @kiiya22 โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @lilbiyaya โ€” ใƒฝ @shiya_yaaa โ€” ใƒฝ @kysolce โ€” ใƒฝ @Wynteeeer โ€” ใƒฝ @mssuesih โ€” ใƒฝ @shiuronekz โ€” 3pts ใƒฝ @cha_linn โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @akiraiiui โ€” ใƒฝ @lilieshope โ€” 6pts ใƒฝ @Cbadminn โ€” 9pts ใƒฝ @cheolsgโ€ฆ

โค5

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @savsellers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank โ€” 851,123 of 1,627,068entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ€” republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ€” and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโ€™s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ€” a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel โ€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched โ€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting todayโ€™s namer to yesterdayโ€™s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason โ€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides โ€” the โ€œNamed by N registered channelsโ€ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 โ€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

โ€œ๐’ฎ๐‘Ž๐‘ฃ๐‘ ๐‘’๐‘™๐‘™๐‘’๐‘Ÿ๐‘ .โ€ (@savsellers), 99 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savsellers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.