Пусть там и останется ☕️

Channel
Спасти рядовую 2В
@savingprivate2b
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
203subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001877444824 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @savingprivate2b |
| Description | Здесь будет Монумент ко всем моим грехам. Мне лень вести ТГ или Инсту. Какие-то фотки, какие-то постироничне (или нет) мысли\истории обо всем и ни о чем. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/savingprivate2b |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:00 | 203 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:46 | 203 | first reading |
Engagement
13 posts held, back to 30 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 84.6%
- avg views ÷ 203 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 172
- 12 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 9.27%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 12
- of 13 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 12 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 13 (30 June 2026 – 8 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,062 |
| Reactions total | 177 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈1,900
- Videos
- ≈110
- Links
- ≈155
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
205 reactions across 11 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 58 | 28.3% | |
| 🤣 | 48 | 23.4% | |
| 🥰 | 36 | 17.6% | |
| 🔥 | 31 | 15.1% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 5.37% | |
| 🤝 | 6 | 2.93% | |
| 🌚 | 4 | 1.95% | |
| 🤡 | 3 | 1.46% | |
| custom 5226683506528107068 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| custom 5228917967558817364 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| custom 5229006405230411063 | 2 | 0.976% | |
| 🤬 | 2 | 0.976% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 13 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 205reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 13 most recent posts we hold, published 30 June 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Ожидание - реальность
🤣3🤬2❤1
Это было потно, думал вопросы будут из разряда: нравится хэйло? А может и Джона-117 уважаешь? Тогда поясни за предыдущих 116 Джонов😧
Разбуди меня через десять лет и устрой мне тест по Хэйло. А вообще, вот чего не ожидал внезапно в личке )))
🤣8
В общем, когда-то давно, вышла игра в сеттинге Nier и это была карточная гача, которая рассказала какую-то историю и подошла к истории Нир Автоматы, а потмо они закрыли сервера. Фанаты научились поднимать свой сервак, у японцев конечно же бомбануло от этого, но как будто в вопросах лицензии кого-то в интернете волнует мнение японца. Так вот, оказывается можно развернуть свой персональный с бесконечно валютой и норм…
🔥8custom 52290064052304110632
🤩Постепенно пытаюсь осваивать планшет. На каждый день рождения и новый год. Диме рисую открытку, обычно на бумаге, но в этот раз решила попробовать на планшете, рисую крайне долго. Потому что, тяжело освоиться со всеми наворотами, которые есть в программах для рисования, но уже лучше пишу на планшете на японском, но Дима её так и не выложил, так что выложу у себя.🤩
❤5🔥2
В общем Доверился я Интернету в том, что игра хорошая. Купил за 2400 и решил проникнуться японским вайбом и вышками от юбисофт. Так вот, если бы я мог вернуть деньги за первые за два часа, то игра проигрывает бой за мое внимание. Мобы бьют еще до того как закончится катсцена и управление перейдет к игроку, затемнение экрана пока ты катишь на лошади и вот ты уже стоишь около лошади и должен биться со стрелком на нож…
custom 52266835065281070682custom 52289179675588173642🤡1
Отсылает к великому хД
🤣13❤9🥰2
Это я в субботу на Гикролле🙃🙃🙃
🤣24😁11🤝6🌚2🤡2
Photo, posted without a caption
❤9🥰5🌚2
В общем В мои 35 Соня подарила мне симулятор отца, а Илай с Соней скинулись на траурную процессию. Выглядит как спойлеры на будущую жизнь хд
🥰14❤7🔥4
Соня подарила мне прагмату и там в комплекте был конверт внутри которого такая штука ☕️
🥰14❤10🔥7
Showing the 12 most recent of 13 posts we hold for @savingprivate2b. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,163,110 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Спасти рядовую 2В” (@savingprivate2b), 203 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/savingprivate2b.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.