Channel
@save_spb
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,380subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001393341473 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @save_spb |
| Created | 26 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/save_spb |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 08:32 | 2,380 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:20 | 2,381 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:47 | 2,382 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 2,382 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 10 (25 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,496 |
| Reactions total | 362 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
244 reactions across 7 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤬 | 146 | 59.8% | |
| 😢 | 31 | 12.7% | |
| 👍 | 27 | 11.1% | |
| 🔥 | 22 | 9.02% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 4.92% | |
| 💔 | 4 | 1.64% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.41% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.41% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 362reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ Старинный дом на Приморском шоссе 391 в Солнечном - т.н. "Синюю лавку" семьи Кяяпя, где сейчас находится отделение почты, обещают избавить от уродского сайдинга! Дом построен не позднее 1910-х годов. Неоднократно перестраивался, но сохранял исторический облик, пока в 2012 году его не уделали сайдингом - очевидно, по заказу почтовиков. В 2016 году Почта России на запрос журналиста Дмитрия Ратникова писала, что возв…
👍13🤬2
На сайте ГАТИ выложено ограничение движения по проспекту Обуховской Обороны с 8 августа 2026 по 5 ноября 2026 года. Цель - снос застройки по четной стороне проспекта. В том числе дома 54 - школы Ольги Берггольц и штаба 1-й гвардейской дивизии ЛАНО.
🤬30👍1👎1😢1
Готовится снос одного из бывших производственных корпусов кожзавода «Марксист» (пер. Декабристов, дом 7 лит.O) - под очередной, неизвестно уже какой по счету, проект для театра Эйфмана. Здание советское, видимо, предвоенной постройки, поэтому законом не охраняется. Но все равно: насколько же даже такая утилитарная архитектура того времени на голову выше современного сарая, который появится на этом месте! Вот такое,…
🤬22😢19🔥4👍2🤔1
Главный производственный корпус Императорской карточной фабрики (пр. Обуховской Обороны, 110 лит. Б): завершается капремонт под бизнес-центр. Фото Светланы Калмыковой, 31.07.2026 История, обычная для памятников промышленной архитектуры, попавших в руки застройщиков: в 2006 году часть комплекса фабрики - заводоуправление и ремонтно-механический цех - была снята с охраны по заключению экспертизы "АРС" и на следующий г…
🔥18👍11❤9
30 июля 1941 года, 85 лет назад, штаб 1-й гвардейской дивизии ЛАНО отправил последнее донесение, написанное в здании школы на пр. Обуховской Обороны (бывшей школы Ольги Берггольц): "Штадив 1 гв. сд. Ленинград. Проспект Села Смоленского 20. 8 ч 00 мин 1. Части 1 гвард. с.д. заканчивают сосредоточение в районе указанном в боевом приказе N2 и приводят себя в порядок. 2. 2-й эшелон штадива в 8.00 30.7.41 убыл в район с…
🤬29😢7❤2
Администрация Новой Ладоги выставила на продажу бывший дом купчихи Агаповой. В объявлении скромно указано "покупатель принимает на себя обязательство по сохранению объекта культурного наследия". Однако дома уже 8 лет физически не существует - в 2017 году он горел, а затем его незаконно снесли. Сейчас на месте дома-памятника - ровный зеленый газон. Между тем, еще в 2022 году суд по иску областного Комитета по сохран…
🤬32😢4
Заседание суда по школе Берггольц. По ту сторону решетки слева направо - прокурор Барсукова, судья Смирнова Наталья Аркадьевна, экспертка Олеся Чайникова и юристка КГИОП Елена Патока. На остальных фото - сценарий торжественного митинга по открытию мемориальной доски в честь 1-й гвардейской стрелковой дивизии ЛАНО, сама доска и что с ней сделали смольнинские чиновники.
🤬31💔4❤1
Решение по школе Берггольц заняло считанные минуты, текст был готов заранее. Заседание началось с опозданием на полтора часа (судья ушла на совещание), но не продлилось и часа – с учетом длинного допроса «эксперта» Олеси Чайниковой. Суд полностью проигнорировал рецензию, написанную опытным аттестованным экспертом Марией Стовичек. По мнению рецензента, заключение экспертизы содержит массу нарушений – от формальных (…
Напоминаем! Завтра, 29 июля 2026 г., будет открытое судебное заседание по оспариванию желания КГИОП и КРТИ приговорить школу О.Ф. Берггольц (Штаб 1-й гвардейской дивизии ЛАНО) к сносу. Адрес суда: Бассейная ул., 6. Начало заседания в 11 часов 00 минут в зале № 51 (5-й этаж). Будет допрос эксперта Олеси Чайниковой - той самой, которая приговорила к уничтожению здание ВНИИБа, а еще пыталась приговорить старинные дома …
Доходный дом Бредаля на улице Шкапина. Красота, которая прямо сейчас гибнет из-за преступного бездействия. Хотя дом давно уже мог бы быть отремонтирован за частный счет, причем еще и с прибылью для города. Фото Виктора Мудрова, 25.07.2026
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @save_spb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 45,305 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Живой Город” (@save_spb), 2,380 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/save_spb.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.