. Julian Assange: „Digitale Archive ermöglichen es ihnen, Geschichte mit einem Klick zu löschen. Eines Tages: ‚Seite nicht gefunden.‘ Am nächsten: ‚Sie hat nie existiert.‘ Sie kontrollieren eure Erinnerungen. Behaltet Bücher aus Papier. Vertraut nicht der Cloud.“ CHECK: ❗️ Assange hat früh erkannt, wie zerbrechlich das digitale Gedächtnis ist – im Gegensatz zu verstreuten Papierarchiven. Deshalb sein ständiger …

Channel
#Wikileaks
@saveAssange
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
229subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001216887177 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @saveAssange |
| Description | This channel was created to collect posts from Twitter, linking to news about Julian Assange - once powered by nitter.net @ifttt. additional info: @WikiLeaksTwitterbot |
| Created | 8 April 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/saveAssange |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 | 229 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:03 | 229 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 1 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 21.4%
- avg views ÷ 229 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 49.0
- 1 post measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (1 October 2024 – 17 July 2026) |
| Views total | 49 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 02:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈206
- Videos
- ≈58
- Links
- ≈50,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Recent posts
‼️👉 EILMELDUNG: "Julian Assange strebt offenbar ein Treffen mit US-Präsident Trump an, um weitere Korruption innerhalb der demokratischen Elite im Kongress sowie in den Regierungen von Obama und Biden aufzudecken. Sollte Trump diesem Treffen zustimmen? ..." Quelle: https://x.com/i/status/2011986650444796318 https://t.me/Med_Beds JETZT abonnieren und nichts mehr verpassen: https://t.me/EvaHermanOffiziell
👀☄️ Julian Assange reicht Strafanzeige gegen die Nobelstiftung ein: "Der Friedenspreis ist kein Kriegsfonds!" ‼️👀 📌 "Alfred Nobels Stiftung für den Frieden kann nicht für die Förderung des Krieges verwendet werden." WikiLeaks-Gründer Julian Assange hat in Schweden eine umfassende Strafanzeige eingereicht, in der er 30 Nobelstiftungsbeamte der Veruntreuung, der Förderung von Kriegsverbrechen und der Umwandlung des F…
Julian Assange Archive - Erinnern. Bewahren. Weitertragen. Das Julian Assange Archive ist mehr als eine Sammlung – es ist ein lebendiges Zeugnis für Wahrheit, Gerechtigkeit und weltweite Solidarität. Gezeigt werden Protestmaterialien, Kunstwerke und vor allem persönliche Gegenstände, die Julian Assange und sein Team dem Archiv anvertraut haben – darunter Briefe aus der Haft, Erinnerungsstücke aus der ecuadorianisch…
🎞 Der Sonntagsfilm: Israel und die Bombe – Ein radioaktives Tabu Ein Dokumentarfilm von Dirk Pohlmann aus dem Jahr 2012. @AssangesRache
#WikiLeaks on #USAID. Stella Assange retweeted via X.
Joe Biden hat seine ganze Familie, Liz Cheney und Anthony Fauci begnadigt. Aber er hat Julian Assange nicht begnadigt. Wird Präsident Trump das ändern? #PardonAssange ➜ Kommentare, multipolar
Wikipedia officially adds "Gaza genocide" to its "List of Genocides" page. @BRICSNews
Marie Wasilewski von FreeAssange.eu hält die Laudatio auf den International ethecon Blue Planet Award 2024 Preisträger Julian Assange: "Persönlich empfinde ich besonders beeindruckend, was mit diesen Eigenschaften wohl eng verknüpft ist: seine Selbstlosigkeit. Exemplarisch sieht man dies an einem Bild, das in der ecuadorianischen Botschaft aufgenommen wurde. Dort sieht man ihn am Fenster stehend, hinter einem Vorhan…
‘Catastrophic’: Journalists say ethnic cleansing taking place in a news void in northern Gaza https://cpj.org/2024/11/catastrophic-journalists-say-ethnic-cleansing-taking-place-in-a-news-void-in-northern-gaza/ @PressFreedom
John Shipton interviewed by Jackson Hinkle
BitMask: ist kostenlos, funktioniert ohne Nutzerkonto und ohne Konfiguration, kein Datendiebstahl bitmask.net/install Durch die Verwendung von Bitmask VPN könnt ihr euren gesamten Internetverkehr sicher über einen #VPN-Server eurer Wahl leiten. Mit Bitmask VPN könnt ihr die Zensur umgehen, euren Standort anonymisieren und viele Formen der Netzwerküberwachung blockieren. 👉 kostenlose Alternativen #www #internet
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @saveAssange. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,587 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 190,4002 postsPaul Schreyer
@Paul_Schreyer_Kanal · 1,1442 postsBuschfunk
@Buschfunke · 3,0801 postCPJ - Committee to Protect Journalists - PressFreedom
@CPJ_org · 111 postDr. Mona Aranea - Soziologin und Mutter
@Dr_Mona_Aranea · 1,1151 postHamburg4Assange offiziell
@Hamburg4Assange · 1081 postMultipolar Magazin
@multipolar_magazin · 23,0231 postNachDenkSeiten
@NDS_Hinweise · 8,1071 postRalph_Boes
@ralph_boes · 1421 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@multipolar_magazin · 23,0233 postsEva Herman Offiziell
@EvaHermanOffiziell · 190,4002 postsBRICS News
@bricsnews · 152,8511 postCPJ - Committee to Protect Journalists - PressFreedom
@CPJ_org · 111 postDr. Mona Aranea - Soziologin und Mutter
@Dr_Mona_Aranea · 1,1151 postLauraAboli
@LauraAbolichannel · 170,9051 postMed Betten (Quantum beds Germany) Kanal 🇩🇪
@Med_Beds · 24,7251 postNachDenkSeiten
@NDS_Hinweise · 8,1071 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@saveAssange named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“#Wikileaks” (@saveAssange), 229 subscribers as measured 7 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/saveAssange.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.