если я беру фильтр в кофейне, я
- с пониманием подхожу к выбору сорта23%
- выбираю по наитию/по названию77%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@sauroshasaysstuff
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
196subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001535198084 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sauroshasaysstuff |
| Created | 18 November 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sauroshasaysstuff |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:55 | 196 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:47 | 195 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 195 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 1 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
313 reactions across 13 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 142 | 45.4% | |
| ❤🔥 | 54 | 17.3% | |
| 🌭 | 41 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 6.71% | |
| 🌚 | 15 | 4.79% | |
| 😁 | 9 | 2.88% | |
| 🎉 | 8 | 2.56% | |
| 🙏 | 7 | 2.24% | |
| 🎃 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 🎄 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 🕊 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 😈 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 🤔 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 0.639% | |
| 😎 | 1 | 0.319% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.319% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 313reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2024 to 16 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
если я беру фильтр в кофейне, я
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
если бы у вас был идентичный близнец того же пола, что и вы, вы бы скорее:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🤔1🤯1
https://youraislopbores.me/ наверное самый крутой сайт за последнее время
❤14🔥3
с наступающим!
❤21🎉8🎄2
бэнгер из словарного твиттера
❤🔥13😁9❤4🔥4
бонус: сицилийский десерт cassatella di Sant'Agata
❤26🌚6❤🔥3🌭1
много думаю про изображения раннехристианских великомучениц у них трагичные и кровавые жития — все они подвергались пыткам за свою веру и в конечном итоге погибли, а потом были причислены к лику святых хочу поделиться своими, если так можно сказать, любимыми (обе они, кстати, покровительствуют сицилии) первая — святая Агата, которой отсекли груди вторая — святая Лючия, жительница Сиракуз, которая лишилась глаз: по о…
❤18❤🔥3
File, posted without a caption
🙏7🌭4🕊2😈2
думаю что это достойно срочного полуночного включения друзья подлая еврейская музыка это саундтрек к гоночке про кёрби 2003 года мораль думайте сами
❤20🌭3
сегодня дорогие подписчики приношу вам удивительные макдональдсы о которых я думаю не менее раза в неделю а то и чаще [1-2] безумный ар-нуво в Суботице (Сербия); венгры настроили там всяких цветных и вычурных приколов в начале ХХ века, вот в одном таком открыли фастфуд [3-4] хундертвассер-мак (экс-автогриль) где-то на трассе в Австрии, который было сказано построить для привлечения посетителей; судя по отзывам на к…
🌭27❤20❤🔥11
первая, про которую я точно не скажу лучше автора: урбанистический приход за общагой поначитавшись Вырыпаева, имея карманный Samsung и будучи современником всем людям в 2007 году вторая, которая напомнила, как я люблю пластилиновую ворону посмотрите, если есть свободная минутка! (буквально)
🔥13❤🔥1
блин у меня же паблик надо что-то постить в конце ноября сходила на фестиваль одноминутного кино! 70 ответов на вопрос “что происходит?” — мигающих, меланхоличных, ставящих картинку впереди звука или картинку без звука совсем, но в первую очередь очень честных и с как-то непреднамеренно возникшим лейтмотивом потерянности очень круто, что авторам после показов дали слово, и слово это было не ограничено их собственным…
❤🔥9🌚9🌭4❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @sauroshasaysstuff. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
если я беру фильтр в кофейне, я
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
если бы у вас был идентичный близнец того же пола, что и вы, вы бы скорее:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
я здороваюсь:
The shares total 286%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 1 September 2024 to 16 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“saurosha is typing...” (@sauroshasaysstuff), 196 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sauroshasaysstuff.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.