New Members Teaching! How You Imagine Yourself Determines Your Life Shunyamurti continues his exploration of the Nine Divisions of Trinitarian Consciousness, revealing a map of the journey from egoic identification to the Absolute Self. He explains why even Sat Chit Ananda is only the boundary of what can be spoken about the Absolute, and why liberation ultimately requires letting go of every representation to revea…

Channel
Sat Yoga Members
@satyoga108
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
246subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 29 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001747030128 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @satyoga108 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 29 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/satyoga108 |
Topic
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 23 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Sept 2026, 06:40 | 246 | -2 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 10:59 | 248 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 23:42 | 249 | +1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:15 | 248 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 19 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 20.7%
- avg views ÷ 246 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 51.0
- 3 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 3
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (19 June 2026 – 28 August 2026) |
| Views total | 153 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 06:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
16 reactions across 5 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 87.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 14 | 87.5% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 12.5% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 16 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 19 June 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
New Members Text Q&A! Powerless or Powerful? A paradoxical exchange exploring how the true Self is the infinite power dreaming reality, while the ego complex—subconsciously aligned with apparent controllers and the death drive—can ultimately serve a higher purpose: awakening to immortality through the death of the ego. https://www.members.satyoga.org/text/powerless-or-powerful/
Namaste Friends. Shunyamurti gave a teaching that we have just published. It's the most recent teaching on the Vigyani Audio Player. Here's a link to listen: https://www.members.satyoga.org/vigyani-audio-player/
New Members Teaching! Suffering Is Our Initiation In this teaching transmission on the purpose of a true Wisdom School, Shunyamurti reveals that awakening is not the accumulation of spiritual concepts but the deactivation of the ego program that obscures our true nature. Shunyamurti explains that practical and theoretical knowledge can take us only to the threshold, while liberation ultimately requires the grace of …
New Members Essay! The Art of the Decision Life seems like one decision after another. Most people, in matters of importance, generally make bad decisions. That is why the world is now in ruins. When a business or government or church is run by people who are not gifted with the art of decision-making, then even the most successful enterprise can go down the drain in no time at all. It is only after one has made a s…
Namaste Friends. Shunyamurti gave a teaching that we have just published. It's the most recent teaching on the Vigyani Audio Player. Here's a link to listen: https://www.members.satyoga.org/vigyani-audio-player/
New Members Teaching! Attachment to Your Story Prevents Self-Realization As the world enters the final phase of Kali Yuga, Shunyamurti explains why awakening the buddhi—the faculty of true spiritual discernment—is now essential. The ego is nothing more than a conditioned program generating endless narratives that keep us trapped in fear, desire, and suffering. Real freedom does not come from improving the story or a…
New Members Q&A! Is Doomsday Just a Game? The Eschaton is indeed a game, but one played for the highest stakes—requiring the sacrifice of the finite self to attain infinite consciousness, the ultimate prize sought by all great wisdom traditions. https://www.members.satyoga.org/text/doomsday-just-game/
New Members Teaching! The Secret That Makes the Impossible Easy! In this foundational satsang, Shunyamurti returns to the heart of Sri Ramana Maharshi’s teaching with a message of radical simplicity: Be Still. He explains that the ego is nothing more than an acquired program of trauma, fear, self-doubt, and compulsive thought, and that liberation begins the moment we stop identifying with it. As the world approaches…
New Members Guided Meditation! The Serene Silence Within the Sound of Presence In this immersive guided meditation, Shunyamurti leads us into the timeless field of Pure Presence. As attention settles into the "sound of silence," the soul attunes to the eternal vibrational frequency of the Self. This silent current purifies the mind, awakens the Buddha Nature, and reveals the infinite consciousness that remains uncha…
New Members Teaching! How Can We Explain Our Collective Stupidity? In this intellectually dazzling and spiritually transformative satsang, Shunyamurti bridges ancient nondual wisdom with modern philosophy to illuminate one of the deepest mysteries of existence: What is this world? Drawing on the insights of Jean Baudrillard, Abhinavagupta, Adi Shankaracharya, and Sri Ramana Maharshi, he reveals why reality is better…
Namaste Friends. Shunyamurti gave a teaching that we have just published. It's the most recent teaching on the Vigyani Audio Player. Here's a link to listen: https://www.members.satyoga.org/vigyani-audio-player/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @satyoga108. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@drchristianenorthrup · 41,964
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sat Yoga Members” (@satyoga108), 246 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satyoga108.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.