Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Hall Of Fame | SATValley Results

Channel

Hall Of Fame | SATValley Results

@satvalleyresults

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

52subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003849303429
TypeChannel
Username@satvalleyresults
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 15 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/satvalleyresults

Growth

5210 Aug 2026, 02:45 — 52 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 10:01 — 52 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 02:4510 Aug 2026, 10:01
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 51–53 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Aug 2026, 10:0152no change
10 Aug 2026, 02:4552first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 15 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
93
Links
18

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

15 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 53.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
853.3%
🏆746.7%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 15reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 12 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Jun 2026, 11:18 UTC598 views11 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Spring 2026 cohort. Real scores. Real students. 1410 · 1450 · 1470 · 1480 · 1490 · 1510 · 1520 7 students. Two broke 1500. 🏆 What did they have in common? They didn’t study more than everyone else. They studied differently. Diagnostic. Weakness analysis. Roadmap. Weekly improvement. If you want to get the same kind of results… August cohort starts the same system. Enrollment: June 20. React — 🏆 @sat_valley 🚀

🏆74

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC271 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Azizbek Turdiboyev🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1400+ Club — Result #6 Another student from our March SAT results. Score: 1450 One result can be luck. But when you see result after result, it shows something different: a system that works. And this is still not the end of our March Results Series. More 1400+ and 1500+ results are coming 🔥 If you are preparing for the June or August SAT and want to study

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC164 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Anonymous🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1400+ Club — Result #6 Another strong March SAT result from our student. Score: 1470 The student wanted to stay anonymous, but the result still deserves to be shared. Because every 1400+ score in this series proves the same thing: with the right preparation system, consistent practice, and proper feedback, strong SAT results become much more realistic. More March resu

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC170 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Qobiljon Aliev🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1400+ Club — Result #7 Another student joined the 1400+ Club in the March SAT. Score: 1400 One result can be luck. But when results keep coming one by one, it shows a system. That’s why we are sharing this series — to show what our students achieved through preparation, consistency, and guidance. More 1400+ and 1500+ results are still on the way 🔥 If your next SA

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC192 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Xabiba Xayrullayeva🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #1 Now we move to the 1500+ Club. One of our March SAT students achieved an outstanding score: Score: 1550 A 1500+ SAT score is not something that happens by accident. It requires clear strategy, strong consistency, deep mistake analysis, and the right preparation system. This is the level we are building inside our SAT Accelerator Progra

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC320 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Muxammadyusuf Musayev🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #2 The 1500+ Club continues. Another March SAT student reached a top-level score: Score: 1540 Scores like this are not built from random practice. They come from focused preparation, smart strategy, detailed mistake review, and consistent work until exam day. We still have more March results to share 🔥 Preparing for the June or August

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC315 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Dostonbek Axrorov🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #3 Another outstanding result from our March SAT students. Score: 1540 Reaching 1500+ takes more than just solving many questions. It takes knowing exactly what to improve, learning from every mistake, and following a clear preparation system. That’s what makes results like this possible. More 1500+ results are still coming 🔥 If you are ai

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC348 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Jansulu Yerjan🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #4 Another student. Another 1500+ score. Score: 1530 At this level, every point matters. That’s why strong SAT preparation is not only about studying harder — it is about studying with the right direction, understanding your weak points, and improving them strategically. This is what separates random preparation from real progress. More March

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC365 views0 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Salimov Javohir🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #5 Some scores speak for themselves. Score: 15XX+ This is another March SAT result from our students — and another reminder that high scores are built before exam day, through the right habits, the right strategy, and the right support. The 1500+ Club is not finished yet. More results are coming 🔥 If June or August SAT is your next target, me

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC464 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Gulsora Abdullayeva🚀 SAT Valley March Results Series 1500+ Club — Result #6 The standard keeps rising. Score: 1500 A 1500+ score is the result of many small decisions done right: choosing the right questions, reviewing mistakes properly, fixing weak areas, and staying consistent until exam day. This is why preparation needs structure, not just motivation. More March SAT results are coming 🔥 Planning to take t

2

15 May 2026, 06:08 UTC643 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sat_valleyPhoto

Some reviews from our June Accelerator Group The lessons have already started — and students are already working toward their target scores. In this program, students learn with teachers who have been accepted to top universities such as Carnegie Mellon University in Qatar and HKUST. If you are taking the June SAT, this is the right time to join. Inside the Accelerator Program, you’ll get structured preparation,

2

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @satvalleyresults. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 405,692 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Hall Of Fame | SATValley Results” (@satvalleyresults), 52 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satvalleyresults.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.