Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Satoshi talk

Channel

Satoshi talk

@satoshi_discussion

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Cite this entry

13subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002340930588
TypeChannel
Username@satoshi_discussion
DescriptionCrypto, news, talk & discussion
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/satoshi_discussion

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 November 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 7 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@satoshi_discussion/1448 · this entry8 Jun 2026, 12:18 UTC@dustburp/138 Jun 2026, 12:53 UTC1.0034 minutes
@satoshi_discussion/1449 · this entry15 Jun 2026, 12:34 UTC@dustburp/1415 Jun 2026, 13:05 UTC1.0031 minutes
@satoshi_discussion/1450 · this entry22 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC@dustburp/1522 Jun 2026, 12:52 UTC1.0033 minutes
@satoshi_discussion/1451 · this entry29 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC@dustburp/1629 Jun 2026, 12:56 UTC1.0035 minutes
@satoshi_discussion/1452 · this entry6 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC@dustburp/176 Jul 2026, 12:59 UTC1.0038 minutes
@satoshi_discussion/1458 · this entry22 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC@dustburp/1822 Jul 2026, 13:06 UTC1.0035 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@dustburp8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0035 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@warthog48 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@skimaskbrettbase8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0029 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@revolongg8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0019 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@pepewifcap8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0028 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@PlayVersus_X8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0028 minutesthis entry (8–0)
@bizarrebeasts5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002 minutesthis entry (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 12 comparable posts for this entry, running 10 May 2026 to 30 July 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @PlayVersus_X. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

137 August 2026 — 13 subscribers12 August 2026 — 13 subscribers7 August 202612 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 4 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12–14 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 03:0213no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:1013first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 10 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈32
Videos
≈12
Links
≈1,350

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:13 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

🙂 The results are in! The winner for the $3,000 Bobby marketing package DM Bobby to see who. → Click to see winner

30 Jul 2026, 14:48 UTC2 viewsread 12 August 2026

🔥 Last day. Survey closes tonight, 23:59 UTC $3,000 of Bobby advertising, for you or a project you rate. Four minutes, and it's done. Winners will be announced in Bobby DM Click here HERE to ensure you can see the winner when announced → SURVEY TO WIN

27 Jul 2026, 10:50 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Tangem is the easiest way to secure your crypto with real self-custody. No seed phrases to manage, no complex setup, just tap and go. Get 20% off all purchases with our exclusive code bobby for a limited time, grab yours now. Buy Here - https://tangem.com/invite/BOBBY

22 Jul 2026, 12:31 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

We're giving $3,000 of Bobby Ads to one project. Bobby is now live across nearly 3,000 groups across Telegram, with close to 1,000,000 active users. We want to ensure we are delivering the best Bobby to all our users. Four minute survey. Tell us what works, what doesn't, and which project should get the campaign if you win. Winner announced 31 July in Bobby DM Go to Bobby DM to ensure you get the update. Take t…

16 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

BuyBot Error. We receieved an event but were unable to process it.

16 Jul 2026, 11:06 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

BuyBot Error. We receieved an event but were unable to process it.

16 Jul 2026, 10:05 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

BuyBot Error. We receieved an event but were unable to process it.

16 Jul 2026, 10:02 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

BuyBot Error. We receieved an event but were unable to process it.

16 Jul 2026, 10:01 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

BuyBot Error. We receieved an event but were unable to process it.

6 Jul 2026, 12:21 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

🟢 BOBBY LEAGUE 🟢 LIVE Week of Jun 29, final standings 🏆 This week's winner @QuietWyattEFT took the crown with 353 boosts. The podium 🥇 @QuietWyattEFT 353 boosts 🥈 Silver 255 boosts 🥉 Bronze 182 boosts 5,777 boosts logged across the network this week. See the full board. DM Bobby.

29 Jun 2026, 12:21 UTC4 viewsread 12 August 2026

🟢 BOBBY LEAGUE 🟢 LIVE Week of Jun 22, final standings 🏆 This week's winner @QuietWyattEFT took the crown with 294 boosts. The podium 🥇 @QuietWyattEFT 294 boosts 🥈 Silver 257 boosts 🥉 Bronze 219 boosts 6,177 boosts logged across the network this week. See the full board. DM Bobby.

22 Jun 2026, 12:19 UTC5 viewsread 12 August 2026

🟢 BOBBY LEAGUE 🟢 LIVE Week of Jun 15, final standings 🏆 This week's winner @LouieXIVTheSunKing took the crown with 376 boosts. The podium 🥇 @LouieXIVTheSunKing 376 boosts 🥈 Silver 270 boosts 🥉 Bronze 267 boosts 6,234 boosts logged across the network this week. See the full board. DM Bobby.

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @satoshi_discussion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Satoshi talk” (@satoshi_discussion), 13 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/satoshi_discussion.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.