Channel
@sarfvanahw110
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
996subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001625635943 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sarfvanahw110 |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sarfvanahw110 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:48 | 996 | +2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 994 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 994 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 2 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
36 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 25 | 69.4% | |
| 👍 | 6 | 16.7% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 13.9% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 36reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 2 January 2026 to 28 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
«سؤال و جوابِ منظوم» «سؤال» سَلِّم عَلى شَيخِ النُحاةِ مُکَرَّمِ هَذا سُؤالٌ مَن يُجِبهُ يُعظَّمِ أَنا إِن شَكَكتُ وَجَدتُموني جازِماً وَإِذا جَزَمتُ فَإِنَّني لَم أَجزِمِ «جواب» إِن إن نَطَقتَ بِها فَإِنکَ جازِمٌ وَإِذا إِذا تاتي بِها لَم تَجزِمِ «تکملة» در کتاب ألغازالنّحویّة جلال الدّین سیوطی، این سؤال و جواب چنین آمده است: قالَ بعضُهم: سَلِّمْ عَلى شَيخِ النُحاةِ وَقُل لَهُ هَذا سُؤالٌ مَن يُجِبهُ يُعظَّ…
❤4
«ألفرقُ بینَ اللَّبسِ وَ اللُّبْسِ » ألفرقُ بینَ اللَّبسِ وَ اللُّبْسِ بفتحِ اللّامِ وَ ضَمِّها أنَّ اللُّبْسَ بالضَّمِّ مصدرُ قولِکَ: لبِستُ الثَّوبَ ألبَسُ مِن بابِ عَلِمَ¹، وَاللَّبسَ بالفتحِ مصدرُ قولِکَ: لَبَستُ علیهِ الأمرَ ألبِسُهُ من بابِ ضَرَبَ² أی خلطتُه و جعلتُه مشتبهاً علیه.{ شیخ زاده في تفسیر سورة الأنعام} . ___ 1_عَلِمَ یَعلَمُ{ فعِلَ یَفعَلُ} . 2_ضَرَبَ یَضرِبُ{فعَلَ یَفعِلُ}. 💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
❤3👍1
«حروف جارّه به نظم » دربیان حروف الجارّه هفده حرف از حروف جرّ¹ میدان یقین کاندرین یک بیت آمد جمله بی چون و چرا با وتا و کاف و لام و واو و منذُ مُذ خلا رُبَّ حاشا مِن عدا فی عَن علی حتّی إلی ____ 1_به نظر : «هفده حرف از حروف جارّه میدان یقین» بخوانیم در وزن أصحّ باشد. 💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
«یادداشتی ناقص درباب تعدیه کردن فعل لازم » لازم را به هفت چیز متعدّی می کنند: یکی به همزهٔ باب مثل: أذْهبتُ به؟؟؟. دویّم: به تضعیفِ عین مثل: فرّحتُ زیداً. سیّم: به حرف جرّ مثل: ذهبتُ به. چهارم: به سین استفعال مثل: إستخرَجتُه. پنجم: به الف مثل: سایرتُهُ. ششم: به حذف حرفِ جرّ مثل: قول جناب اقدس..... 💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
❤3👌2
«علامتِ فعل متعدّی ولازم » علامت متعدّی این است که می باشد فعل مثل عضو« کضَرَبَ بیدِه و رَکَضَ برِجلِه و أبصرَ بعینِه و سَمِعَ بأُذُنِهِ و تَکلَّمَ بِلِسانِه» أو حاسّةٍ« کذاقَ وشَمَّ» أو قلبٍ« کعَلِمَ و ظَنَّ» . و علامةُ اللّازم ماکان فعلَ جمیعِ البدنِ «کقامَ و ذهب و قَعَدَ وجَلَسَ» أو ماکان من فعلٍ مضموم العین أو من فعلٍ مکسورها و کان لوناً أو خُلقیّاً کعَوِرَ و حمرَ أو معتلّاً کوَجِلَ . 💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
❤3
«النّحوُ زینٌ لِلْفَتیٰ» أَلنّحوُ زینٌ لِلْفَتیٰ یُکرِمُهُ حیثُ أتیٰ مَنْ لمْ یَکُنْ یَعرِفُهُ فَحَقُّهُ أنْ یَسْکُتا 💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
❤1
💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
«یک یادداشت و چند شعر» معلوم مخدومی ام بوده باشد که شما اهل خبره می باشید. کسی تا امثله، صرف میر، تصریف نخواند قوٍهٔ عوامل ملّا محسن یا جرجانی یا شرح تصریف یا انموذج ندارد. شفقت شما این باشد که امثله، تصریف را زحمت کشیده کامل بفرمایند. ● ده چیز شعار سازی سرمایهٔ کارِ خویش سازی بیخوابی و جوع و عزلت وفکر پس همّت و زهد، عبادت و ذکر باشی پیوسته با طهارت باغیر خدا نبوده کارت ● گنه کاریم و زهدی می فروشیم که شاید …
❤2
💐🍃🍃@sarfvanahw110
«عطف به فاء و ثمّ وفرق آن دو » ابن مالک در الفیّه گوید: وَالفاءُ لِلتّرتیبِ باتِّصالِ وثُمَّ لِلتّرتیبِ بِانْفِصالِ «ترجمه» وفاء برای ترتیب است با اتّصال{ بدون مهلت] و ثمّ برای ترتیب است با انفصال{با مهلت}.¹ ● جلال الدّین سیوطی در شرح الفیّه می نویسند: {وَالفاءُ لِلتّرتیبِ باتِّصالٍ} و تَعقیبٍ، نحو: الّذي خلقَکَ فسوّیکُ، وامّا قولُه تعالی: و کمْ مِن قریةٍ أهلکناها فجاءها بأسُنا بیاتاً، فمعناه : أردنا إهلاکَها …
«کالعطفِ بِثُمّ أو کعطفٍ بالفا» این سه شعر از شیخ بهاء الدّین محمّد العامِلي است که به خطّ مبارک خویش درآخر نسخهٔ کتاب حدیقهٔ هلالیّه نگاشته است: لکاتبِها الفقیر بهاء الدّین محمّدالعامِلي یا نَفسَ مضیٰ عُمرُکِ عاماً عاما مِن جهلِکِ لَمْ تُحَصِّلي إتماما حَصَّلْتِ فَقاهةً وفَضلاً وَ عُلاً لکنَّکِ لَمْ تُحَصِّلي إسلاماً وَ لَهُ لاتَبٌکِ مُعاشِراً نَأَی أو ألِفا فَالقَومُ مَضَوا وَ نحنُ نَمضي خَلَفا بِالمُهلةِ أ…
❤1👌1
👇 https://t.me/sarfvanahw110/301 https://t.me/sarfvanahw110/473
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sarfvanahw110. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 614,084 of 1,549,704entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“فوائد نحویّه ولطائفِ صرفیّه” (@sarfvanahw110), 996 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarfvanahw110.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.