2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 169–171 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Aug 2026, 15:01
170
no change
8 Aug 2026, 13:01
170
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 19 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
102.3%
avg views ÷ 170 subscribers
Avg views / post
174
18 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.42%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
18
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held
18 (19 July 2026 – 6 August 2026)
Views total
3,130
Reactions total
201
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
8 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
438
Videos
28
Links
63
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
201 reactions across 18 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5258226446429597326
46
22.9%
custom 5274262883650273708
46
22.9%
🔥
36
17.9%
custom 5258024041800806722
27
13.4%
custom 5260626229341464697
19
9.45%
custom 5256031782565863247
11
5.47%
💅
9
4.48%
custom 5255976931538529855
7
3.48%
Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 201reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Доброго денечка! Хочу предупредить, что сегодня высока вероятность, что стрима не будет, т.к. я не шутила, что у меня много задач на работе... я постараюсь успеть хотя бы к 18:00, но пока сомнительно 😐
❤️🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅🔅 ❤️
Ура! Та-да-да-дам! 🐈 Объявляю розыгрыш на коллекцию «Новый Фронтир. Возвращение»!
Но, к сожалению, только для игроков из России и стран СНГ! 😐
Условия участия:
➡️ Подписаться на мой твич
➡️ Подписаться на мой тг канал
➡️ Присутствовать на прямой трансляции во время итогов
Победитель розыгрыша определится на стриме, а значит ваше присутствие необходимо 🙂
✅ Розыгрыш пройдет: 16.08.2026 (воскресенье)…
Всем привет! Простите, что потерялась 😐 В воскресенье был 100% выходной из-за ДнД, а вчера я работала и сил не было((
Сегодня стрим вечерний послерабочий будет 📝 И сегодня же выкачу анонс розыгрыша, следите…
И да, поздравляю с началом последнего летнего месяца 😭
Вчера отменили ночной велофестиваль, но я все равно покаталась на велике 🙂 Переживала, что будет плохо, но самочувствию стало только лучше!
Впопыхах фоткала зоопарк московский, а потом заметила, что там чел на велике сидел вахаха
Стрима не будет, я очень нехорошо себя чувствую. У меня жуть глаза болят и голова тоже после вчерашнего валика 😐 А я еще решила погулять в жару и сделала хуже)))
Игра My Eerie Lair — воплощение всех фанфиков, которыми я зачитывалась в свои 14 лет, думая, что абьюз, мужские рычания и угрожающий шепот "ты принадлежишь мне" — это супер пупер секси и лучшие отношения 🫠
Геймплей? Обставлять мрачный замок всякой мебелью и параллельно читать сюжетные диалоги, как в новеллах, только тут еще модельки по экрану ходить будут ❤️ (в демке были кровь, кишки и т.д.)
По рейтингу возрастно…
На boosty выложила стрим с Кариной 🙂 Там мы болтали, проводили аукцион и смотрели "Как отшить парня за 10 дней"! Доступно по подписке "Маленькая рыбка" 🐈
Сейчас вообще в целом все стримы с просмотрами фильмов буду выкладывать! Сори, что так тянула с этим 🥺
🌸 🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸🌸
Вот примерно такой план на неделю 😌
🤍🤍 100% отдых
🤍🤍 19:00: ✨ АУКЦИОН НА ХОРРОР ФИЛЬМ ✨
🤍🤍 16:00: Валорант (играю за дуликов)
🤍🤍 16:00: Devil May Cry 5
🤍🤍 16:00: Валорант + PUMMEL PARTY
🤍🤍 16:00: Devil May Cry 5 (финалим)
🤍🤍 100% отдых
Друзья, всем привет! Наконец-то наступил день кастомок 🙂 Как и обещано расписанием, начинаем в 14:00!
И конечно же, проводить я их буду не одна, а в компании cherteya и ее чата, т.к. играть мы будем друг против друга 🫠
Но и это еще не все, на экране представлено ✨ БИНГО ✨ и если чат постарается выполнить его, то получит награды!
НАГРАДЫ ЗА ЗАДАНИЯ БИНГО:
💛 3/9 и *идея от чата*
💛 6/9 и следующий стрим по валоранту …
🔥6custom 52582264464295973261
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sarachuma. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 19 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 320,504 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sarachuma 🦈” (@sarachuma), 170 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sarachuma.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.