Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

саня баблтишник

@sanyabubbletea

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

85subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003740989469
TypeChannel
Username@sanyabubbletea
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sanyabubbletea

Growth

7585806 August 2026 — 75 subscribers9 August 2026 — 75 subscribers14 August 2026 — 85 subscribers6 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 74–87 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 23:5285+10
9 Aug 2026, 21:3075no change
6 Aug 2026, 16:4475first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
62.6%
avg views ÷ 85 subscribers
Avg views / post
53.2
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
19.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 16 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held16 (15 July 20264 August 2026)
Views total745
Reactions total107
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 21:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

114 reactions across 13 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52043117949773537813934.2%
3026.3%
custom 53055137443007821101412.3%
custom 528533461784963106765.26%
🔥65.26%
❤‍🔥43.51%
custom 528504163236056992132.63%
👾32.63%
👀21.75%
👍21.75%
👻21.75%
🌚10.877%
🙏10.877%
🤝10.877%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 114reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 16 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanyabubbletea. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 08:15 UTC69 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

теперь точно последний отданный слот🌟 сижу балдею над конкурсом а вы че делаете

🔥62👻2👀1

1 Aug 2026, 06:39 UTC54 views13 reactions1 Starread 9 August 2026
Photo

увидел у ксусика в канале, что автор свалки запускает новый сериал, так что фанартик в поддержку автору!!!😊 на самом деле я не смотрел свалку тк узнал о ней ближе к концу, надеюсь в этот раз ничего не пропустить☺️ (репостните пожалуйста работу, если она вам нравится, это очень помогает продвигать канал😘) upd: спасибо за звёздочку!!!😛

custom 520431179497735378172❤‍🔥2🌚1👀1

31 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC53 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

олд мани буквально ( в сливе они ебу🌸ся)

6custom 52043117949773537813custom 53055137443007821102

29 Jul 2026, 14:36 UTC51 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

решил попробовать сделать дудл ии... понял, что: • с каждым днём я все больше ленюсь, стараясь сделать и охватить как можно больше за раз • из-за этого качество сильно упало, а над сюжетами я почти не думаю, отчего они стали долбоёбскими на картинках: 1. Рекламный баннер с меховой накидкой, которую хочет Джун 2-3. Дудл, посвященный этому(ну и возможно предыстория подарка) думаю мне стоит сесть за прописывание с

29 Jul 2026, 12:39 UTC39 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

БЛЯ А ЕСЛИ СДЕЛАТЬ КОМИКС В ФОРМАТЕ "19 дней однажды" ЧЕ ДУМАЕТЕ?! (кто не читал, там не цельная история, а отрывки из жизни персонажей, раскрывающие их отношения) ❤️ - ты гений 🤩 - хочухочухочу 🤩 - мне кажется обычный формат комикса лучше будет

custom 528533461784963106762custom 52850416323605699212

28 Jul 2026, 20:04 UTC54 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

день 3 ИТОГИ ДНЯ 🫰🫰🫰: 1. доделав обложку, сел за ещё один арт-антураж(хотя мб Я вставлю его в конец как кадр комикса) 2. написал ещё одну лирику, теперь у меня есть аж 3 лирики из альбома: • Bang' en Luck (заглавка) • LUCK ATTACK (бисайд) • Saranghae Dear (конец альбома) в планах: • Не проснуться завтра с мыслью, что мне надоело(шутка смешная, ситуация завтра) • Раздавать вайба • Найти музыканта в рабство за респе

4👍2custom 52043117949773537811custom 52850416323605699211custom 53055137443007821101

28 Jul 2026, 15:33 UTC46 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

готовая обложка к альбому, вокруг которого будет построено все остально че я делаю на конкурс 🥹 - ВАЙБ ❤️ - я бы послушал ❤️ - жду остальные апдейты #конкурс

custom 5204311794977353781125custom 53055137443007821103❤‍🔥1

28 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTC41 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Poll

показать готовую обложку?🤪

  1. да🤩89%
  2. нет, это прямой спойлер, зритель встаёт выходит🤩22%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

custom 52043117949773537811

27 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC46 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ИТОГИ СЕГОДНЯШНЕГО ДНЯ ☝️☝️☝️(раз уж начали то надо публично,чтоб потом не слиться и не отвертеться) 1. зарендерил лицо для обложки альбома(фактически это антураж, но мне очень хочется сделать как можно более реально погружение, а так как это айдол, ему нужны кадры, текста, обложки и желательно песни но песни писать не умею) 2.3 скетча страничек комикса к конкурсу тоже, вот такая я простая русская трудяга 💪💪💪 В П

6❤‍🔥1🤝1custom 53055137443007821101

27 Jul 2026, 09:10 UTC53 views2 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

вот до чего доводит гиперфикс девочки написал 2 текста песен, полноценную заглавку и бисайд(жаль, сами песни писать и петь не умею), также составил большой мудборд концепции и накидал пару идей что можно сделать, прикол если я проснусь и мне перехочется все это делать 😶

custom 52043117949773537812

26 Jul 2026, 19:39 UTC48 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

грецкий омежка придумываю че буду рисовать на конкурс от @korzhikUwU и @lifenka , пока осваиваю персонажей и думаю над нарядиками и идеями (вы даже не представляете, насколько я обожаю персонажей-айдолов, это мой гиперфикс уже 6 лет🤪) #конкурс

custom 530551374430078211072

26 Jul 2026, 16:50 UTC43 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

последний отданный слот🤪 я молодец я все сделал🤪

custom 520431179497735378191🙏1

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @sanyabubbletea. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 15:15 UTCFinal Results9 voters

показать готовую обложку?🤪

  1. да🤩89%
  2. нет, это прямой спойлер, зритель встаёт выходит🤩22%

The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 4 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 602,176 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“саня баблтишник” (@sanyabubbletea), 85 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanyabubbletea.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.