Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Варя, грей!

Channel

Варя, грей!

@santabarbaragrey

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

112subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002496488072
TypeChannel
Username@santabarbaragrey
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/santabarbaragrey

Growth

1101121119 August 2026 — 110 subscribers10 August 2026 — 110 subscribers17 August 2026 — 112 subscribers9 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 110–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 19:46112+2
10 Aug 2026, 20:14110no change
9 Aug 2026, 23:02110first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
65.4%
avg views ÷ 112 subscribers
Avg views / post
73.2
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
15.6%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,098
Reactions total171
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 23:02 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
43s
Average length
22s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

171 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 53255560502737873336236.3%
custom 54676971382364186084526.3%
custom 53211931580700088172011.7%
custom 54361316712314671612011.7%
custom 540221479123632865184.68%
custom 539998986503301265274.09%
🤣74.09%
custom 539984770161551857721.17%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 171reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 11:44 UTC42 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Сегодня забрали котика, которого мы нашли и временно пристроили у себя. Событие радостное, но я как будто рассталась с лучшим другом… Пусть у него все будет хорошо 🙏🏻

custom 53211931580700088178custom 54361316712314671614custom 54676971382364186083custom 53255560502737873332

9 Aug 2026, 07:14 UTC54 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Итак, флешмоб. 1. Снимаете в любую соцсеть короткое видео с припевом песни «Поедем в 5 утра», где вы едете на машине/трамвае/велосипеде/в маршрутке не важно, на чем) 2. Выкладываете с хештегом #поедемв5утра 3. Радуемся 😄 23 августа случайным образом я выберу 10 видео и подарю автору пряник со строчкой из песни и что-то из своего мерча на выбор.

custom 53255560502737873337custom 54361316712314671613custom 54676971382364186082

8 Aug 2026, 18:16 UTC57 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Мне сегодня и вчера пришло много теплых отзывов на песню. Спасибо вам большое! Всем, кто просто послушал, кто нашел время написать пару слов о песне, кое-кто мне даже спел сегодня в голосовом, кто-то прислал летнее видео с детьми под мою песню. Все это невероятно важно и поддерживающе! А я скоро объявлю небольшой флешмоб. Будем на связи ❤️🫶🏻

custom 54676971382364186088

7 Aug 2026, 08:31 UTC58 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Плейлист в «Звуке» https://zvuk.com/playlist/13977123

custom 53255560502737873336custom 53211931580700088174custom 54676971382364186084

7 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC230 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Варя, грей! – Поедем в 5 утра. Песня о мечте, свободе и путешествиях. Написана в рамках проекта УАЗ: искусство движения в музыкальной лаборатории «Шум». Сведение, мастеринг: Александр Мишин Слушать на всех площадках

custom 53255560502737873339custom 54676971382364186086custom 53211931580700088171

7 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC54 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ну что, дождались 🎧

custom 53255560502737873335custom 54361316712314671613custom 53211931580700088172

6 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC56 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Вырезательные предрелизные работы

custom 53255560502737873338custom 54676971382364186087custom 53211931580700088171

6 Aug 2026, 11:25 UTC58 views8 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54361316712314671614custom 54676971382364186083custom 53255560502737873331

6 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC59 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Мне в этот раз вообще как-то странно ощущается релиз. Обычно жду, как праздника. А тут в потоке дел не успела насладиться. Надеюсь, завтра как-то все будет пободрее с настроением.

custom 54676971382364186084

6 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC54 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Завтра песня уже

custom 53255560502737873338custom 54361316712314671613custom 54676971382364186083

5 Aug 2026, 10:41 UTC66 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

В преддверии выхода песни покажу вам беспристрастные отзывы на нее) Я приняла участие в турнире SFEROOM (ИИ+живые треки), песню оценивают 2 судьи и искуственный интеллект, покажу вам их отзывы на "Поедем в 5 утра", мне кажется, они создадут еще больше интриги)))

custom 53255560502737873333custom 54676971382364186081

4 Aug 2026, 19:26 UTC58 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Кхм-кхм! https://band.link/O2rFO

custom 53255560502737873337custom 53211931580700088174custom 54361316712314671611

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @santabarbaragrey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,022,233 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Варя, грей!” (@santabarbaragrey), 112 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/santabarbaragrey.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.