Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for San qolam | Абдул Малик

Channel

San qolam | Абдул Малик

@sanqolam1

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

59subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003692159671
TypeChannel
Username@sanqolam1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 4 April 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sanqolam1

Growth

596059.56 August 2026 — 60 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60 subscribers13 August 2026 — 59 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 59–60 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:3659-1
10 Aug 2026, 05:0160no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:2060first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 4 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 40s
Average length
2m 20s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

25 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1352.0%
728.0%
🔥416.0%
🕊14.00%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 25reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 4 April 2026 to 14 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Jul 2026, 01:15 UTC44 viewsread 10 August 2026

Мои впечатления от этой книги: Автор пишет в предисловии, что одной из его главных целей было показать читателю, насколько образ мышления, широта знаний и ясность изложения влияют на формирование разума и на то, как человек выражает свои мысли. Он заставляет задуматься о том, как ты сам мыслишь и как следует размышлять в будущем. Книга представляет собой сборник статей на самые разные темы. Первая посвящена салафии

8 Jun 2026, 18:02 UTC95 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @abdulalim_abu_hamzaVideo

📚 Можно ли выступать в ММА ради пользы для Ислама? Шейх Халид аль-Фулейдж (да хранит его Аллах) 🔻Ссылка на данное видео в YouTube: https://youtu.be/_tJN_Nvu5SQ P.S. В последнее время многие братья обсуждают данную тему в связи с нашумевшим подкастом одного известного спортсмена. При обсуждении этого вопроса многие ссылаются, в том числе, на старый ответ шейха, в котором он сказал, что человек, достигший больших у

7 Jun 2026, 20:10 UTC53 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @dibirovmuradPhoto

Это смешная картинка из интернета, отражающая реальность ответов искусственного интеллекта. Он легко ошибается, легко признает свою ошибку, а потом легко ошибается снова. Ему нельзя доверять свое здоровье, а тем более свою религию. Большая глупость, когда человек задает ему вопрос и руководствуется его ответом. С его помощью можно найти ответ в достоверных источниках, но сам он никак не может быть источником ответа

25 May 2026, 14:25 UTC89 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @fiqhacademyVoice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

1

25 May 2026, 14:25 UTC88 views1 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @fiqhacademyFile

File, posted without a caption

1

25 May 2026, 12:08 UTC67 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @fiqhacademyFile

Десять вопросов, связанных с постом в День Арафа. Шейх Солих аль-Усейми. ⠀⠀Подписаться на канал Академии фикха 📚

1👍1🔥1

8 May 2026, 11:34 UTC≈1,800 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

На уроке наш преподаватель Фейсал Замиль Шахрани дал нам очень сильное наставление: начать читать книги Ибн аль-Каййима прямо сейчас, пока мы еще студенты Университета . Он посоветовал читать хотя бы по 50 страниц в день, объяснив, что для нас это совсем немного. Причем он подчеркнул, что не нужно пытаться всё зубрить или заучивать. Достаточно просто вдумчиво читать и выделять для себя какие-то полезные моменты. Но

👍51

2 May 2026, 15:52 UTC198 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

- تتمة مقدمة تقريب التهذيب - ⁠المحاضرة في علم الرجال للمعلمي. يقدمه فضيلة الشيخ: عبدالله محمد خضر الزهراني.

👍2

25 Apr 2026, 13:24 UTC200 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

مقدمة تقريب التهذيب لابن حجر يقدمه فضيلة الشيخ: د. عبدالله محمد الزهراني.

👍2🔥21

17 Apr 2026, 16:50 UTC204 viewsread 10 August 2026

Намерение при поминании Аллаха Обязательно ли для получения результата от поминания иметь намерение обрести те мирские блага, которые связаны с определёнными азкарами, такими как утренние и вечерние поминания, чтение аята «аль-Курси» перед сном и двух последних аятов суры «аль-Бакара»? Об этом говорят — а Аллах знает лучше — что рабу следует произносить поминания как акт поклонения Аллаху и деяние, а мирские цели и

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanqolam1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 135,673 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“San qolam | Абдул Малик” (@sanqolam1), 59 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanqolam1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.