Channel
@sanoatdantashqarida
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
184subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001489385785 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sanoatdantashqarida |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sanoatdantashqarida |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 20:39 | 184 | -1 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 22:16 | 185 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 11:17 | 186 | +3 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 13:08 | 183 | +1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 16:04 | 182 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:01 | 184 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:18 | 184 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
57 reactions across 14 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 13 | 22.8% | |
| 👍 | 11 | 19.3% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 19.3% | |
| 🤣 | 7 | 12.3% | |
| 🕊 | 4 | 7.02% | |
| ⚡ | 2 | 3.51% | |
| ✍ | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 3.51% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.75% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.75% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 57 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sanoatdantashqarida. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 6 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Farosatni ko‘pchilik boylik, “yuqori doira” bilan bog‘laydi. Ammo boy farosatsizlar ham, oddiy hayot kechirib juda nozik did va odob bilan yashaydiganlar ham ko‘p. Menimcha, farosatning eng sodda formulasi bor. Farosat 1.0: “Men bu ishim bilan kimnidir xafa qilamanmi, unga zarar yoki noqulaylik tug‘diramanmi?” —>Javob ha bo‘lsa,qilmaslik. Farosat 2.0: “Men bu ishim bilan kimningdir ishini yengillashtira, kayfiya…
👍3
Manashunaqa “mol” bo’lmang. O’rtadagi bu joy yana kimdir kelib zaryadlashi uchun qo’yilgan, katta xolangizni uyiday yalpayib olishga emas.
💯1
Agar «Bunyodkor», «Lokomotiv», «Olmaliq», «Bekobod» kabi futbol klublari byudjetdan bemalol pul ola bilsa, unda shu mantiqni oxirigacha olib borish kerak. Sovet davridan beri nurab, abgor ahvolda yotgan shifoxonalarimiz qoshida ham homiylik asosida «Onalar va bolalar FC», «Yuqumli kasalliklar shifoxonasi FC», «Tez yordam 16 FC» degan klublar tuzaylik. Hartugul, shunda futbol bahonasida shifoxonda bir havosiz xonasi…
🔥2😢2✍1
Aslida masala tarvuzda ham emas. Korzinka seleksionerlari xatosi va sizning noyob tarvuz tanlash qobiliyatingiz orasidagi muqobil javobda.
😁3🤣1
Xay, rivojlanaverishsin.
😁4
Qahvaxona sohibi 1571-yildagi Italiyadagi Lepanto urushini berilib tushuntiryapti. Chunki alamli mag’lubiyat haliyam Usmoniylar tarixida iz qoldirgan. Bu orada raqobatchi ekanimizni aytsammi yo’qmi deb tinglab o’tiribman
🤣4😁4
Yonimizda Turklar Otranto Cafe ochishibdi. Ichkari xonasini kitob mutolaasi yoki ish uchun shunaqa bezatib qo’yishibdi.
❤2
Chunki biror kitobni muhokama qilishdan maqsad xonaga bir fikr bilan kirib, ikki soat davomida o‘sha fikrni himoya qilib, yana o‘sha fikr bilan chiqib ketish bo‘lsa, unda uchrashishga ham hojat yo‘q edi. Uyda o‘zimiz bilan gaplashib o‘tirsak ham bo‘lardi. Menga esa boshqa narsa qiziqroq hozir, bir-biriga mutlaqo qo‘shilmaydigan odamlar bir stol atrofida o‘tirib, bir-birini “xato odam” deb emas, balki “men ko‘rmayot…
👍1
Shuning uchun Book Coffee’dagi muhokamalarda uchta oddiy mezonni saqlashni istayman: Shaxsni emas, fikrni tanqid qilamiz. Da’vo qilgan odamdan dalil so‘rashdan tortinmaymiz. Kuchliroq dalil uchrasa, fikrimizni o‘zgartirishni mag‘lubiyat deb hisoblamaymiz. Mehmon ham tanqid qilinadi. Kitob ham. Gellner ham. Men ham.
Menimcha, aynan shu diskussiyaning foydasi. Afsuski, bizda savol berishning o‘zi ko‘pincha pozitsiya deb qabul qilinadi. “Balki shundaydir?” desangiz, odamlar sizni allaqachon “shunday deb hisoblaydiganlar” safiga yozib qo‘yadi. Bir gipotezani himoya qilib ko‘rsangiz, go‘yo umrboqiy mafkuraviy manifest imzolagandek bo‘lasiz. Holbuki, fikrlashning o‘zi vaqtincha noto‘g‘ri bo‘lish huquqini talab qiladi.
Yana eng qiziq savol, shunday vaziyatlarda milliy birdamlik jamiyatning o‘z manfaatlarini himoya qilishiga yordam beradimi yoki aksincha, “biz va ular” degan qulay tasavvur yaratib, asl muammoni korrupsiya, zaif institutlar va siyosiy iqtisodni yashirib qo‘yadimi? Men bu savollarning ayrimlariga uchrashuv boshida o’zimni qarashin, oxirida esa biroz boshqacha qaradim.
Shuning uchun Book Coffee’da Ernest Gellnerning “Nationalism” kitobini muhokama qilishni istadik. Gellnerning eng qiziq fikrlaridan biri millatlar biz tasavvur qilganimizdek azaldan tayyor shaklda mavjud bo‘lib, keyin millatchilik ularni himoya qilish uchun paydo bo‘lmagan bo‘lishi mumkin. Aksincha, modern davlat, ommaviy ta’lim, standart til, sanoatlashuv va umumiy madaniy makonning o‘zi bugungi millat tushunchasini…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanoatdantashqarida. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sanoatdan Tashqarida” (@sanoatdantashqarida), 184 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanoatdantashqarida.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.