Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Sankov который мини Халк

Channel

Sankov который мини Халк

@sankovofficial66

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

84subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001624823162
TypeChannel
Username@sankovofficial66
Created6 September 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sankovofficial66

Growth

8486857 August 2026 — 86 subscribers9 August 2026 — 86 subscribers16 August 2026 — 84 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 9 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 84–86 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 04:1284-2
9 Aug 2026, 16:1786no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:1286first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 38s
Average length
31s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

281 reactions across 20 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤‍🔥4415.7%
🔥4415.7%
289.96%
👍207.12%
🤣176.05%
custom 5220085642192500606144.98%
💯113.91%
👏103.56%
custom 521330550803478338493.20%
🦄93.20%
🙏82.85%
🥰82.85%
😢51.78%
🤝51.78%
🆒41.42%
🐳41.42%
💩41.42%
😁41.42%
😇41.42%
🙉41.42%
13 further kinds258.90%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 281reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2024 to 5 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 May 2025, 11:53 UTC866 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Естественно я писал об этих переменах , очень переживал за Батяя , что он не играет! Теперь точно в основе , верю !💪🏼

❤‍🔥7🤝5🤣5

4 May 2025, 14:26 UTC868 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Ждём перемен ( ❓, ❗️)

💯7🔥3

24 Feb 2025, 06:49 UTC≈1,030 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Мы когда-нибудь закроем 10-ку Азамата😃 А по игре , рад , что дали время подвигаться , была большая пауза , ноги на утро конечно отваливаются , но а когда не болели как говорится! В целом дайте мяч , я его не потеряю , верну , больше устал наверное от того, что приходится бегать без него , а об этом стоит задуматься , почему так происходит , что я без него времени провожу больше , чем с ним 😅

4🔥3custom 52200856421925006062🏆1👍1💘1

4 Oct 2024, 18:51 UTC≈1,220 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

А могло сложиться в этой игре всё по-другому, но получилось как получилось… готовимся к следующей игре💪🏼

custom 52200856421925006065👍3🔥2😢2

2 Oct 2024, 16:25 UTC≈4,100 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кстати, первый раз за все игры МФЛ поругался немного на футбольном поле 🤦🏻‍♂️ Вы же знаете , я спокойный , но он умеет поджигать 🔥😂

9💯2🦄2💩1🔥1🙉1

2 Oct 2024, 16:13 UTC≈8,700 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Легенда, ты готов Барселону исполнять в пятницу? 😂

5🔥4🥰4💩1

30 Sept 2024, 07:00 UTC≈3,890 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/neclasic0/20956 Интересно вот, провал то для кого? Не удивительно, что команда с низов хочет жеребьевку и сыграть с кем-то из топов. Но как будто бы с чего взяли, что например нашей команде интересно играть с Чисто Питером🤦🏻‍♂️ Не , вопросов нет, Газпром Арена и как будто бы интересно становится и то , только с точки зрения нового стадиона , не более ☺️ Не интересно смотреть Файт Найтс - 2D четвертый ра

❤‍🔥3👍2💯21👏1

28 Sept 2024, 07:10 UTC≈7,660 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

- Это что ? БАРСЕЛОНА ? - Это FightNights ! Лишь маленький эпизод нашей вчерашней игры в собачку 😀 И кстати да , Манна , ты уволен !

👍8💩2🔥2custom 52200856421925006062🕊1🙉1🙊1

27 Sept 2024, 17:32 UTC584 views11 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/fcfightnights/4319

❤‍🔥43🥰2😈2

16 Sept 2024, 13:52 UTC513 views12 reactionsread 9 August 2026

https://t.me/saame_15/14 Ты же и на тренировках такой же противный урод, бегаешь, толкаешься😂

🔥5👏3😢3🤣1

29 Aug 2024, 06:01 UTC514 views10 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поднял продажи «пивозавра» на вб 😂 https://t.me/fcfightnights/3895

🤣5❤‍🔥2🙉2🤪1

14 Aug 2024, 13:32 UTC534 views17 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Проиграли 2:0 Потихоньку вкатимся ⚽️

🔥6🙏3❤‍🔥2🥰2custom 52200856421925006062🦄1😇1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sankovofficial66. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sankov который мини Халк” (@sankovofficial66), 84 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sankovofficial66.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.