Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

سنجش واندازه گیری

@sanjehh

On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

9,017subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001176213688
TypeChannel
Username@sanjehh
Descriptionکانال سنجش واندازه گیری برای داوطلبلان آزمون های استخدامی و کارشناسی ارشد ایجاد گردید ارتباط با ادمین @pishbin73
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sanjehh

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear word for word on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@sanjehh/355 · this entry7 Apr 2024, 07:12 UTC@ravanshenasitarbiyati400/9097 Apr 2024, 07:13 UTC1.00under a minute
Every channel this entry shares post bodies with
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@ravanshenasitarbiyati4005 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (41)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 8 comparable posts for this entry, running 7 April 2024 to 8 June 2025. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Across the whole group of 2, the earliest publisher we hold is @sanjehh — which is this entry. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 7 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Also posting the same content

This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 1 other registered channel, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

9,0179,0369,026.57 August 2026 — 9,036 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,036 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,034 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,023 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,017 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,014–9,039 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 01:569,017-6
10 Aug 2026, 19:139,023-11
8 Aug 2026, 03:319,034-2
7 Aug 2026, 11:159,036no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:059,036first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 March 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
4
Links
16

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Recent posts

8 Jun 2025, 12:54 UTC≈2,970 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020Photo

منابع تخصصی

8 Jun 2025, 12:54 UTC≈2,670 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020Photo

منابع عمومی

8 Jun 2025, 12:41 UTC933 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020File

📣📣منتشر شد دفترچه *آزمون استخدامی مشاغل آموزگار، دبیر و هنرآموز وزارت آموزش و پرورش - سال 1404* برنامه زمان‌بندی : ❇️ ثبت‌نام : *یکشنبه 18 خردادماه تا دوشنبه 26 خردادماه 1404* ❇️ دریافت کارت ورود به جلسه : *از روز دوشنبه 30 تیرماه 1404* ❇️ برگزاری آزمون : *پنجشنبه و جمعه 2 و 3 مردادماه 1404* 🌐 لینک ثبت‌نام : https://medu1404.hrtc.ir/hrt لینک کانال @estekhdami_2020

8 Jun 2025, 12:40 UTC≈1,570 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020File

📣📣منتشر شد دفترچه *آزمون استخدامی مشاغل آموزگار، دبیر و هنرآموز وزارت آموزش و پرورش - سال 1404* برنامه زمان‌بندی : ❇️ ثبت‌نام : *یکشنبه 18 خردادماه تا دوشنبه 26 خردادماه 1404* ❇️ دریافت کارت ورود به جلسه : *از روز دوشنبه 30 تیرماه 1404* ❇️ برگزاری آزمون : *پنجشنبه و جمعه 2 و 3 مردادماه 1404* 🌐 لینک ثبت‌نام : https://medu1404.hrtc.ir/hrt لینک کانال @estekhdami_2020

8 Jun 2025, 12:37 UTC≈2,650 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020

📣📣منتشر شد دفترچه *آزمون استخدامی مشاغل آموزگار، دبیر و هنرآموز وزارت آموزش و پرورش - سال 1404* برنامه زمان‌بندی : ❇️ ثبت‌نام : *یکشنبه 18 خردادماه تا دوشنبه 26 خردادماه 1404* ❇️ دریافت کارت ورود به جلسه : *از روز دوشنبه 30 تیرماه 1404* ❇️ برگزاری آزمون : *پنجشنبه و جمعه 2 و 3 مردادماه 1404* 🌐 لینک ثبت‌نام : https://medu1404.hrtc.ir/hrt لینک کانال @estekhdami_2020

12 May 2025, 03:13 UTC≈3,760 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020

✔️ خبررسمی | انتشار دفترچه آزمون استخدامی آموزش و پرورش به زودی... @estekhdami_2020

13 Jan 2025, 16:29 UTC≈7,970 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020

🚨نتایج کد 19 کیفیت_بخشی اعلام شد. 🔆لینک مشاهده نتایج👇👇 https://medu.hrtc.ir/hrt/profile/ کانال ای استخدام @estekhdami_2020

9 Jan 2025, 07:13 UTC≈7,940 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020Photo

انجام کلیه کارهای اینترنتی ثبت نام وام ازدواج و فرزند آوری ثبت نام ماشین https://wa.me/+989302118459

15 Jun 2024, 12:53 UTC≈20,500 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020

🔴📢 فوری: اعلام ‌نتایج اولیه آزمون استخدام دبیری آموزش و پرورش https://www.sanjesh.org/fa-IR/sanjesh/4936/news/view/14591/11369/Staging

16 Apr 2024, 07:10 UTCviews —

سنجش واندازه گیری pinned «تست های فصل اول سنجش واندازه گیری از کتاب علی اکبر سیف👇👇»

15 Apr 2024, 18:30 UTC≈16,300 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020File

نمونه تست های قانون اساسی جمهوری اسلامی ایران تلگرام👇👇 @estekhdami_2020 ایتا👇👇👇 http://eitaa.com/estekdam اینستاگرام👇👇👇 https://instagram.com/eeste.khdam

15 Apr 2024, 18:29 UTC≈14,500 viewsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @estekhdami_2020File

نمونه تست های بیانیه گام دوم انقلاب اسلامی تلگرام👇👇 @estekhdami_2020 ایتا👇👇👇 http://eitaa.com/estekdam اینستاگرام👇👇👇 https://instagram.com/eeste.khdam

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanjehh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Mar 2024, 13:07 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,930 voters approx.

کدام روش تعیین پایایی بر ثبات نتایج آزمون تاکید دارد ؟

  1. بازآزمایی35%
  2. آلفای کرونباخ31%
  3. دونیمه کردن17%
  4. کودر ریچاردسون17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2024, 13:06 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,050 voters approx.

مشکل اساسی استفاده از کدام روش سنجش این است که اگر آزمون شونده احساس کند که نتایج سنجش برای قضاوت درباره او به کار خواهند رفت احتمال زیادی دارد که در پاسخ به سوالات جواب درست ندهد؟

  1. عاطفی51%
  2. مشاهده ای22%
  3. عملکردی15%
  4. موقعیتی12%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2024, 13:04 UTCAnonymous Quiz2,120 voters approx.

مقیاس لیکرت بیشتر برای سنجش کدام مورد کاربرد دارد؟

  1. شخصیت16%
  2. نگرش ها58%
  3. توانایی ها14%
  4. عملکرد13%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2024, 13:03 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,490 voters approx.

@estekhdami_2020کدام مورد در خصوص قواعد تهیه مقیاس درجه بندی صحیح نیست؟

  1. ویژگیهای مورد ارزشیابی را به گونه ای بیان کنید که مستقیماً قابل مشاهده باشد .6%
  2. هم ویژگیهای مورد ارزشیابی و هم نقاط روی مقیاس را به روشنی تعریف کنید.9%
  3. از ارزشیابان بخواهید هر زمان به سؤالی بر میخورند که قادربه قضاوت درباره آن نیستند به آن جواب بدهند62%
  4. ابتدا عملکرد یک دانش آموز را در کلیه تکالیف درجه بندی کنید و سپس سراغ تکلیف دانش آموز بعدی بروید23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Mar 2024, 12:59 UTCAnonymous Quiz1,770 voters approx.

کدام مورد از مشکلات و محدودیتهای سنجش با کارپوشه نیست ؟

  1. دشوار بودن ارزشیابی و نمره گذاری9%
  2. پایین بودن پایایی18%
  3. نبودن امکانات نظارت دانش آموزان بر جریان پیشرفت خود50%
  4. نیاز به صرف وقت زیاد توسط معلم برای طراحی آن23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 March 2024 to 8 June 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سنجش واندازه گیری” (@sanjehh), 9,017 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanjehh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.