Channel
@sanity_united
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71,744subscribers
-208 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003130985287 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sanity_united |
| Description | Making life easier through task delegation ⚡️ Sustainable crypto mining powered by renewables 🌍 $SU | https://sanity.fund | Backing by GEM on 25M$ |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sanity_united |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 18:08 | 71,744 | -55 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 06:33 | 71,799 | -21 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 71,820 | -25 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 05:42 | 71,845 | -39 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 71,884 | -27 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 02:31 | 71,911 | -22 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 71,933 | -19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:47 | 71,952 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:01 | 71,952 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
224 reactions across 14 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 79 | 35.3% | |
| ❤ | 53 | 23.7% | |
| 👍 | 25 | 11.2% | |
| 👻 | 18 | 8.04% | |
| 👏 | 15 | 6.70% | |
| 🙏 | 10 | 4.46% | |
| 🎉 | 9 | 4.02% | |
| 👀 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 🤩 | 3 | 1.34% | |
| 🍾 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.446% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 🏆 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 April 2026 to 6 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🏙 Today, the most attractive and profitable locations are often controlled by corporations, funds, platforms, and large owners. 🚶 An ordinary person comes as a guest, pays for a few nights, and leaves without any long-term connection to the place. 🌍 Sanity Estate is building a community for people who want to take part in the development of such places, return there, bring their loved ones, and become part of a sha…
👍4❤3
Messages in this channel will no longer be automatically deleted
Messages in this channel will be automatically deleted after 1 month
Sanity United Channel pinned a photo
Sanity United Channel pinned a photo
🏨 Hotels and rentals give people a few days in a beautiful place, but once they leave, the connection usually ends. 💭 The money is spent, the memories remain, and the place itself continues to belong to someone else. 🌍 Sanity Estate invites people to look at travel in a deeper way: a person can become part of a community that grows around places they want to return to for years. 💎 A $100 contribution opens lifetim…
❤1👏1
🌍 Imagine a world where the best places on Earth are created not just for corporations, foundations, and exclusive clubs, but for communities of people who want to build lasting connections with these places. 🏡 Sanity Estate is built around this idea: people coming together through real estate, leisure, long-term involvement, and places they want to return to again and again. 💎 A $100 contribution grants lifetime m…
🔥7❤2
Channel photo updated
🌍 Sanity United is evolving, while staying true to its core vision. ⚡️ We started as a technology ecosystem: AI, green tech, renewable energy, and blockchain. 🏙 Then a partner with a large real estate portfolio in Mersin joined us — and this region became a priority. 🏡 That’s how Sanity Estate was born: real estate, leisure, and access to luxury properties without buying the entire property. 🔄 This is the next st…
❤3❤🔥1👀1🤩1
🚨 Community Update Earlier today, we observed unusual price activity involving the token on LBank, including an unexpected spike where a single token was valued at $200. Because of this abnormal behavior, the team has decided to pause today’s airdrop distribution while we fully investigate the situation and make sure everything is handled fairly and securely for the community. We understand many of you were expec…
👻18🔥13❤2👀2
Winners list is officially out. 🏆 We’ve published the full spreadsheet containing all selected wallet addresses for transparency and verification. Distribution begins Monday next week, make sure to confirm your wallet is on the list before then. Appreciate everyone who participated. More ahead. https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1u74UmY96IDD2iiXemEMvtQ9pGPIMzuYS45t5fEYG9LA/edit?gid=0#gid=0
🔥15❤9👍3👏1
What is this? 👀
🔥17❤5👏3🙏2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sanity_united. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 77,941 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sanity United Channel” (@sanity_united), 71,744 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sanity_united.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.